Wysong Adult™ with Organic Chicken Canned Canine Diet
Wet Pate · complete
Our verdict
Is Wysong Adult™ with Organic Chicken Canned Canine Diet a good dog food?
We score it 56/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Single named protein: chicken
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids grain: it is listed as an ingredient
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (14)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- veg 33.9%
- additive 22.9%
- carb 16.9%
- supplement 16.9%
- meat 9.3%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Organic Chicken | Chicken | meat · medium | - | 9.3 |
| 2 | Sweet Potato | Sweet Potatoes | carb · good | - | 9.0 |
| 3 | Natural Flavor | Flavor | additive · poor | - | 8.6 |
| 4 | Blueberry | Blueberries | veg · good | - | 8.3 |
| 5 | Organic Barley Grass Powder | Barley grass | carb · good | - | 8.0 |
| 6 | Dried Kelp | Kelp | veg · good | - | 7.6 |
| 7 | Yeast Extract | Hydrolysed Yeast | additive · medium | - | 7.3 |
| 8 | Mixed Tocopherols | Tocopherols | additive · good | - | 7.0 |
| 9 | Rosemary Extract | Rosemary | veg · good | - | 6.6 |
| 10 | Chicory Root | Chicory root | veg · good | - | 6.3 |
| 11 | Minerals (Potassium Chloride, Zinc Proteinate, Zinc Sulfate, Ferrous Sulfate, Iron Proteinate, Copper Sulfate, Copper Proteinate, Manganese Sulfate, Manganese Proteinate, Sodium Selenite, Calcium Iodate) | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 6.0 |
| 12 | Calcium Carbonate | Calcium Carbonate | supplement · medium | - | 5.6 |
| 13 | Vitamins (Ascorbic Acid [source of Vitamin C], Vitamin E Supplement, Niacin Supplement, Calcium Pantothenate, Vitamin A Supplement, Thiamine Mononitrate, Pyridoxine Hydrochloride, Riboflavin Supplement, Vitamin D3 Supplement, Biotin, Vitamin B12 Supplement, Folic Acid) | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 5.3 |
| 14 | Pepper. | Red Pepper | veg · good | - | 5.0 |
- 1. Organic Chicken9.3% estimated
- 2. Sweet Potato9.0% estimated
- 3. Natural Flavor8.6% estimated
- 4. Blueberry8.3% estimated
- 5. Organic Barley Grass Powder8.0% estimated
- 6. Dried Kelp7.6% estimated
- 7. Yeast Extract7.3% estimated
- 8. Mixed Tocopherols7.0% estimated
- 9. Rosemary Extract6.6% estimated
- 10. Chicory Root6.3% estimated
- 11. Minerals (Potassium Chloride, Zinc Proteinate, Zinc Sulfate, Ferrous Sulfate, Iron Proteinate, Copper Sulfate, Copper Proteinate, Manganese Sulfate, Manganese Proteinate, Sodium Selenite, Calcium Iodate)6.0% estimated
- 12. Calcium Carbonate5.6% estimated
- 13. Vitamins (Ascorbic Acid [source of Vitamin C], Vitamin E Supplement, Niacin Supplement, Calcium Pantothenate, Vitamin A Supplement, Thiamine Mononitrate, Pyridoxine Hydrochloride, Riboflavin Supplement, Vitamin D3 Supplement, Biotin, Vitamin B12 Supplement, Folic Acid)5.3% estimated
- 14. Pepper.5.0% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 9% · Fat 7%
Guaranteed analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 9% |
| Fat | 7% |
| Fibre | 2% |
| Moisture | 75% |
Energy: 107 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Cover uneaten portion and refrigerate or freeze for best preservation.
Feeding guide
Feed approximately 1 can per 20 lbs. of body weight per day. The amount required will depend upon activity, age, and environment. Decrease the suggested portion proportionate to the amount of other foods being fed.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Potassium Chloride; Zinc Proteinate; Zinc Sulfate; Ferrous Sulfate; Iron Proteinate; Copper Sulfate; Copper Proteinate; Manganese Sulfate; Manganese Proteinate; Sodium Selenite; Calcium Iodate; Calcium Carbonate; Ascorbic Acid (source of Vitamin C); Vitamin E Supplement; Niacin Supplement; Calcium Pantothenate; Vitamin A Supplement; Thiamine Mononitrate; Pyridoxine Hydrochloride; Riboflavin Supplement; Vitamin D3 Supplement; Biotin; Vitamin B12 Supplement; Folic Acid
Technological additives
Mixed Tocopherols; Rosemary Extract
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-21
Brand and contact: Wysong
- Website
- https://www.wysong.net/
- Contact page
- www.wysong.net
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-21
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.wysong.net
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 0.0/5 · 0 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall score of 56 out of 100 based on several key factors. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +4.8 points, while the additives in the recipe added +5.7 points. However, ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -10.6 points, and the additive load further adjusted the total by -6.1 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.80 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 15.9% | -0.115 | -1.84 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 18.3% | -0.005 | -0.09 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 34.9% | 0.163 | +5.69 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 26.4% | -0.012 | -0.32 |
| Recipe graded poor | 8.6% | -0.065 | -0.56 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 8.6% | 0.060 | +0.52 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -27.51 | 0.222 | -6.11 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.80 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 15.9% | -0.115 | -1.84 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 18.3% | -0.005 | -0.09 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 34.9% | 0.163 | +5.69 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 26.4% | -0.012 | -0.32 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 8.6% | -0.065 | -0.56 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 8.6% | 0.060 | +0.52 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -27.51 | 0.222 | -6.11 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 55.7
- Final score
- 56/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 9 | 36 (band 19.26 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 7 | 28 (band 5.885000000000001 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 2 | 8 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 107 | 428 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 24 nutritional additives on the label
- Potassium Chloride
- Zinc Proteinate
- Zinc Sulfate
- Ferrous Sulfate
- Iron Proteinate
- Copper Sulfate
- Copper Proteinate
- Manganese Sulfate
- Manganese Proteinate
- Sodium Selenite
- Calcium Iodate
- Calcium Carbonate
- Ascorbic Acid (source of Vitamin C)
- Vitamin E Supplement
- Niacin Supplement
- Calcium Pantothenate
- Vitamin A Supplement
- Thiamine Mononitrate
- Pyridoxine Hydrochloride
- Riboflavin Supplement
- Vitamin D3 Supplement
- Biotin
- Vitamin B12 Supplement
- Folic Acid
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| contains a spectrum of beneficial micronutrients (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| premium canned dog food formulated for adult dogs (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| over 95% organic chicken (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| natural form and whole ingredients (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Adult™ with Organic Chicken Canned Canine Diet
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.