We Feed Raw Lamb Recipe
Raw · complete
Our verdict
Is We Feed Raw Lamb Recipe a good dog food?
We score it 60/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, turkey, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids beef: the label lists beef
- Your dog avoids lamb: the label lists lamb
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (12)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 40.5%
- supplement 29.7%
- veg 14.4%
- mineral 9.0%
- additive 6.3%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lamb | Lamb | meat · medium | - | 10.8 |
| 2 | Beef | Beef | meat · medium | - | 10.4 |
| 3 | Beef Liver | Beef Liver | meat · good | - | 9.9 |
| 4 | Beef Kidney | Beef Kidney | meat · good | - | 9.5 |
| 5 | Beef Bone | Bone | mineral · medium | - | 9.0 |
| 6 | Flaxseed | Linseed | veg · good | - | 8.6 |
| 7 | Zinc Sulfate | Zinc sulfate | supplement · medium | - | 8.1 |
| 8 | Vitamin E Supplement | Vitamin E | supplement · good | - | 7.7 |
| 9 | Manganese Sulfate | Manganese sulfate | supplement · medium | - | 7.2 |
| 10 | Vitamin D3 Supplement | Vitamin D3 supplement | supplement · good | - | 6.8 |
| 11 | Salt | Salt | additive · poor | - | 6.3 |
| 12 | Kelp | Kelp | veg · good | - | 5.9 |
- 1. Lamb10.8% estimated
- 2. Beef10.4% estimated
- 3. Beef Liver9.9% estimated
- 4. Beef Kidney9.5% estimated
- 5. Beef Bone9.0% estimated
- 6. Flaxseed8.6% estimated
- 7. Zinc Sulfate8.1% estimated
- 8. Vitamin E Supplement7.7% estimated
- 9. Manganese Sulfate7.2% estimated
- 10. Vitamin D3 Supplement6.8% estimated
- 11. Salt6.3% estimated
- 12. Kelp5.9% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 13.90% · Fat 9.50%
Declared analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 13.90% |
| Fat | 9.50% |
| Fibre | 1% |
| Moisture | 69.50% |
Energy: 180 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Frozen raw; thaw before serving. Goes through HPP (high pressure processing).
Feeding guide
Just thaw + serve
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Zinc Sulfate; Vitamin E Supplement; Manganese Sulfate; Vitamin D3 Supplement
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-17
Brand and contact: We Feed Raw
- Website
- https://www.wefeedraw.com/
- [email protected]
- Phone
- 843-732-2849
- Contact page
- wefeedraw.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-17
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- wefeedraw.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 4.7/5 · 2,152 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The food scored 60 out of 100. Ingredients without printed percentages pulled the score down by -10.6, while the overall quality of the ingredient list lifted it by +5.3. Being labelled nutritionally complete added a further +2.3 points, and the additive load took off -1.7.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.31 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 19.7% | -0.005 | -0.10 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 8.6% | 0.163 | +1.40 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 41.5% | -0.012 | -0.51 |
| Recipe graded poor | 6.3% | -0.065 | -0.41 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 6.3% | 0.060 | +0.38 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -7.69 | 0.222 | -1.71 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.12 | 33.786 | +37.84 |
| Processing: Raw | yes | -0.054 | -0.05 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.31 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 19.7% | -0.005 | -0.10 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 8.6% | 0.163 | +1.40 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 41.5% | -0.012 | -0.51 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 6.3% | -0.065 | -0.41 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 6.3% | 0.060 | +0.38 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -7.69 | 0.222 | -1.71 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.12 | 33.786 | +37.84 |
| Processing: Raw | yes | -0.054 | -0.05 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -1.74
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 60.0
- Final score
- 60/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 13.9 | 45.1 (band 26.2987012987013 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 9.5 | 30.8 (band 8.035714285714286 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 1 | 3.2 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 180 | 584.4 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 69.2% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 4 nutritional additives on the label
- Zinc Sulfate
- Vitamin E Supplement
- Manganese Sulfate
- Vitamin D3 Supplement
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "Protein-rich and highly palatable" — supported by the declared high protein data.
13 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Easily digestible (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Biologically appropriate (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Protein-rich and highly palatable (on page) | High/low level | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Nutrient-dense (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| complete and balanced for dogs of all life stages (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| NO PRESERVATIVES (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Great source of omega 3 and 6 acids (on page) | High/low level | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| NO FILLERS (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| MINIMALLY PROCESSED (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| An excellent source of iron, zinc, and vitamin B12 (on page) | High/low level | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| HIGH-QUALITY MEATS (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| HUMANELY HARVESTED (on page) | provenance | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| This recipe is nutritionally complete and balanced, and complies with AAFCO recommendations for all life stages (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| MADE WITH PASTURE-RAISED LAMB (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Lamb Recipe
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.