Our verdict
Is Utah Paw Puppy a good dog food?
We score it 43/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".
Declared analysis sits below the FEDIAF minimum for protein.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for puppies
- Single named protein: chicken
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - brown / whole grain
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (57)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- supplement 55.0%
- veg 14.1%
- carb 9.0%
- meat 8.9%
- additive 5.5%
- fibre 4.4%
- oil 1.7%
- mineral 1.3%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chicken Meal | Dried chicken protein | meat · good | - | 2.3 |
| 2 | Brown Rice | Rice - brown / whole grain | carb · medium | - | 2.3 |
| 3 | Chicken Fat (Preserved with Natural Mixed Tocopherols (Vitamin E)) | Chicken | meat · medium | - | 2.3 |
| 4 | Pearled Barley | Pearled Barley | carb · medium | - | 2.3 |
| 5 | Oat Meal | Oats | carb · medium | - | 2.2 |
| 6 | Dried Beet Pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre · medium | - | 2.2 |
| 7 | Sweet Potato | Sweet Potatoes | carb · good | - | 2.2 |
| 8 | Catfish Meal | Catfish | meat · good | - | 2.2 |
| 9 | Brewers Dried Yeast | Yeast | supplement · good | - | 2.2 |
| 10 | Flax Seed Meal | Linseed Cake | fibre · medium | - | 2.1 |
| 11 | Egg Product | Egg | meat · good | - | 2.1 |
| 12 | Natural Flavor | Flavor | additive · poor | - | 2.1 |
| 13 | Carrots | Carrots | veg · good | - | 2.1 |
| 14 | Celery | Celery Seeds | veg · good | - | 2.1 |
| 15 | Beets | Beetroot | veg · good | - | 2.0 |
| 16 | Parsley | Parsley | veg · good | - | 2.0 |
| 17 | Lettuce | Lettuce | veg · medium | - | 2.0 |
| 18 | Water Cress | Watercress | veg · good | - | 2.0 |
| 19 | Spinach | Spinach | veg · good | - | 2.0 |
| 20 | Lecithin | Lecithin | supplement · good | - | 1.9 |
| 21 | Potassium Chloride | Potassium Chloride | supplement · medium | - | 1.9 |
| 22 | Salt | Salt | additive · poor | - | 1.9 |
| 23 | D/L Methionine | Methionine | supplement · good | - | 1.9 |
| 24 | Lactobacillus Acidophilus Fermentation Product Dehydrated | Dried Lactobacillus acidophilus Fermentation Product | supplement · good | - | 1.9 |
| 25 | Calcium Carbonate | Calcium Carbonate | supplement · medium | - | 1.8 |
| 26 | L-Lysine | Lysine | supplement · medium | - | 1.8 |
| 27 | Glucosamine | Glucosamine | supplement · good | - | 1.8 |
| 28 | Ascorbic Acid | Vitamin C | supplement · good | - | 1.8 |
| 29 | Yucca Schidigera Extract | Yucca Schidigera | supplement · good | - | 1.8 |
| 30 | Vitamin E Supplement | Vitamin E | supplement · good | - | 1.7 |
| 31 | Ascorbic Acid | Vitamin C | supplement · good | - | 1.7 |
| 32 | Vegetable Oil | Vegetable oil | oil · medium | - | 1.7 |
| 33 | Biotin | Biotin | supplement · good | - | 1.7 |
| 34 | Niacin Supplement | Niacin | supplement · good | - | 1.7 |
| 35 | d-Calcium Pantothenate | Calcium pantothenate | supplement · good | - | 1.6 |
| 36 | Vitamin A Acetate | Vitamin A | supplement · good | - | 1.6 |
| 37 | Riboflavin Supplement | Riboflavin | supplement · good | - | 1.6 |
| 38 | Vitamin B12 Supplement | Vitamin B12 | supplement · good | - | 1.6 |
| 39 | Thiamine Mononitrate | Thiamine mononitrate | supplement · good | - | 1.6 |
| 40 | Pyridoxine Hydrochloride | Pyridoxine hydrochloride | supplement · good | - | 1.5 |
| 41 | Menadione Sodium Bisulfite Complex | Menadione sodium bisulfite complex | supplement · poor | - | 1.5 |
| 42 | Citric Acid | Citric Acid | additive · medium | - | 1.5 |
| 43 | Vitamin D3 Supplement | Vitamin D3 supplement | supplement · good | - | 1.5 |
| 44 | Folic Acid | Folic acid | supplement · good | - | 1.4 |
| 45 | Potassium Chloride | Potassium Chloride | supplement · medium | - | 1.4 |
| 46 | Ferrous Sulfate | Iron sulfate | supplement · good | - | 1.4 |
| 47 | Zinc Sulfate | Zinc sulfate | supplement · medium | - | 1.4 |
| 48 | Zinc Proteinate | Zinc Proteinate | supplement · good | - | 1.4 |
| 49 | Iron Proteinate | Iron Proteinate | mineral · good | - | 1.3 |
| 50 | Zinc Oxide | Zinc Oxide | supplement · good | - | 1.3 |
| 51 | Copper Sulfate | Copper sulphate | supplement · good | - | 1.3 |
| 52 | Manganese Sulfate | Manganese sulfate | supplement · medium | - | 1.3 |
| 53 | Manganese Proteinate | Manganese proteinate | supplement · good | - | 1.3 |
| 54 | Copper Proteinate | Copper proteinate | supplement · good | - | 1.2 |
| 55 | Manganous Oxide | Manganese (II) Oxide | supplement · good | - | 1.2 |
| 56 | Sodium Selenite | Sodium selenite | supplement · poor | - | 1.2 |
| 57 | Calcium Iodate | Calcium iodate | supplement · medium | - | 1.2 |
- 1. Chicken Meal2.3% estimated
- 2. Brown Rice2.3% estimated
- 3. Chicken Fat (Preserved with Natural Mixed Tocopherols (Vitamin E))2.3% estimated
- 4. Pearled Barley2.3% estimated
- 5. Oat Meal2.2% estimated
- 6. Dried Beet Pulp2.2% estimated
- 7. Sweet Potato2.2% estimated
- 8. Catfish Meal2.2% estimated
- 9. Brewers Dried Yeast2.2% estimated
- 10. Flax Seed Meal2.1% estimated
- 11. Egg Product2.1% estimated
- 12. Natural Flavor2.1% estimated
- 13. Carrots2.1% estimated
- 14. Celery2.1% estimated
- 15. Beets2.0% estimated
- 16. Parsley2.0% estimated
- 17. Lettuce2.0% estimated
- 18. Water Cress2.0% estimated
- 19. Spinach2.0% estimated
- 20. Lecithin1.9% estimated
- 21. Potassium Chloride1.9% estimated
- 22. Salt1.9% estimated
- 23. D/L Methionine1.9% estimated
- 24. Lactobacillus Acidophilus Fermentation Product Dehydrated1.9% estimated
- 25. Calcium Carbonate1.8% estimated
- 26. L-Lysine1.8% estimated
- 27. Glucosamine1.8% estimated
- 28. Ascorbic Acid1.8% estimated
- 29. Yucca Schidigera Extract1.8% estimated
- 30. Vitamin E Supplement1.7% estimated
- 31. Ascorbic Acid1.7% estimated
- 32. Vegetable Oil1.7% estimated
- 33. Biotin1.7% estimated
- 34. Niacin Supplement1.7% estimated
- 35. d-Calcium Pantothenate1.6% estimated
- 36. Vitamin A Acetate1.6% estimated
- 37. Riboflavin Supplement1.6% estimated
- 38. Vitamin B12 Supplement1.6% estimated
- 39. Thiamine Mononitrate1.6% estimated
- 40. Pyridoxine Hydrochloride1.5% estimated
- 41. Menadione Sodium Bisulfite Complex1.5% estimated
- 42. Citric Acid1.5% estimated
- 43. Vitamin D3 Supplement1.5% estimated
- 44. Folic Acid1.4% estimated
- 45. Potassium Chloride1.4% estimated
- 46. Ferrous Sulfate1.4% estimated
- 47. Zinc Sulfate1.4% estimated
- 48. Zinc Proteinate1.4% estimated
- 49. Iron Proteinate1.3% estimated
- 50. Zinc Oxide1.3% estimated
- 51. Copper Sulfate1.3% estimated
- 52. Manganese Sulfate1.3% estimated
- 53. Manganese Proteinate1.3% estimated
- 54. Copper Proteinate1.2% estimated
- 55. Manganous Oxide1.2% estimated
- 56. Sodium Selenite1.2% estimated
- 57. Calcium Iodate1.2% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 28% · Fat 18%
Declared analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 28% |
| Fat | 18% |
| Fibre | 3.50% |
| Moisture | 10% |
Energy: 492.4 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
No additives recorded yet.
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19
Brand and contact: Utah Paw
- Website
- https://utahpaw.com/
- [email protected]
- Phone
- 801-613-1364
- Contact page
- utahpaw.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- utahpaw.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall rating of 43 out of 100 based on several key factors. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +5.8 points to the total. However, ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -10.6, the processing format subtracted -6.7, and the additive load contributed -1.5 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.78 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 8.6% | -0.115 | -0.99 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 2.2% | -0.092 | -0.20 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 2.4% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 6.5% | 0.163 | +1.05 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 66.4% | -0.012 | -0.81 |
| Recipe graded poor | 6.7% | -0.065 | -0.44 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 4 | -0.876 | -3.50 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 2.1% | 0.060 | +0.13 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -6.66 | 0.222 | -1.48 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.78 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 8.6% | -0.115 | -0.99 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 2.2% | -0.092 | -0.20 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 2.4% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 6.5% | 0.163 | +1.05 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 66.4% | -0.012 | -0.81 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 6.7% | -0.065 | -0.44 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 4 | -0.876 | -3.50 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 2.1% | 0.060 | +0.13 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -6.66 | 0.222 | -1.48 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Subtotal
- 43.1
- Final score
- 43/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for puppies and growth. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Scored against FEDIAF growth minima; puppy scoring is under review; Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 28 | 30.9 | 63.7 |
| Fat | 18 | 19.9 | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 492.4 | 544.1 | 100 |
Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Great for all dogs to 1 year of age (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Satisfaction Guarantee (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Premium Quality (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Premium dog food with free home delivery (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Utah Paw Puppy Formula is formulated for dogs up to 1 year of age and meets the nutritional levels established by the AAFCO dog food nutrient profiles for the 'Growth' stage (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Secure Payments (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Puppy
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.





