PetLab Co. ProBright®
Supplement complementary
Is PetLab Co. ProBright® a good dog food?
This is a supplement, not a complete diet, so it is not scored on our 1-100 scale. The ingredient breakdown below shows what is in it; a supplement should be fed alongside, not instead of, a complete diet.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
- RecipeNot applicable
- NutritionalNot applicable
- Transparency45
- Safety100
- EvidenceNot recorded
Why you might choose it
- Doesn't list grain ingredients.
Why you might not
- A supplement, not a complete diet: feed as an extra, not the whole diet.
- Meat makes up an estimated 0% of the dry matter; carbohydrates dominate.
- No analytical breakdown is published.
Estimated composition
Typical analysis (as fed)
No analysis recorded yet.
Additives & feeding info
Nutritional additives
Proprietary Blend of Probiotics (Lactobacillius helveticus, L. rhamnosus, Bifidobacterium longum); Brown Algae (Ascophyllum nodosum); Sodium Hexametaphosphate; Rosemary Leaf Extract; Green Tea (Decaffeinated); Perilla Seed Extract
Storage
Keep in a cool, dry place, away from direct sunlight. Ensure tub is resealed after each use.
Feeding guide
Give at mealtime. Do not add to water. Dog Size / Daily: Extra Small Under 4 lbs - 1 small scoop/Extra Small; Extra Small 4-11.9 lbs - 1 big scoop/Extra Small; Small 12-24.9 lbs - 1 scoop/Small; Medium 25-75 lbs - 1 scoop/Medium; Large Over 75 lbs - 1 scoop/Large.
Reviews
Trustpilot: 3.9/5 · 14,717 reviews
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (10)
| # | As declared | Matched | Category | Tier | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Proprietary Blend of Probiotics (Lactobacillius helveticus, L. rhamnosus, Bifidobacterium longum) | Probiotic | supplement | good | - | 12.9 |
| 2 | Brown Algae (Ascophyllum nodosum) | Seaweed | veg | good | - | 12.3 |
| 3 | Sodium Hexametaphosphate | Sodium hexametaphosphate | additive | medium | - | 11.6 |
| 4 | Rosemary Leaf Extract | Rosemary | veg | good | - | 11.0 |
| 5 | Green Tea | Green Tea | veg | good | - | 10.3 |
| 6 | Perilla Seed Extract | Seeds | veg | poor | - | 9.7 |
| 7 | Calcium Bentonite | Bentonite And Bentonite Montmorillonite | additive | medium | - | 9.0 |
| 8 | Dried Brewer's Yeast | Brewer's Yeast | supplement | good | - | 8.4 |
| 9 | Spinach Powder | Spinach | veg | good | - | 7.7 |
| 10 | Yeast | Yeast | supplement | good | - | 7.1 |
Brand
- Website
- https://thepetlabco.com/
- Contact page
- thepetlabco.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-20
- Product page
- thepetlabco.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Scored with model v3 on 2026-09-26. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.73 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 33.6% | -0.005 | -0.17 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 27.6% | 0.163 | +4.49 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 38.8% | -0.012 | -0.47 |
| Recipe graded poor | 9.7% | -0.065 | -0.63 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 9.7% | 0.060 | +0.58 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -24.77 | 0.222 | -5.50 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.73 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 33.6% | -0.005 | -0.17 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 27.6% | 0.163 | +4.49 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 38.8% | -0.012 | -0.47 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 9.7% | -0.065 | -0.63 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 9.7% | 0.060 | +0.58 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -24.77 | 0.222 | -5.50 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 49.8
- Final score
- 50/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
This is not a complete diet, so the 1-100 rating does not apply to it. Read the recipe breakdown above as ingredient-quality context only.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
Not applicable to complementary food. FEDIAF reference ranges apply to complete diets.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supports healthy teeth & gums (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Promotes fresh breath (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Helps target oral biofilm & tartar build-up (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Helps keep teeth clean (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 85% of PetLabCo.® subscribers surveyed saw positive results within 3 months of daily use (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Vet-reviewed formula (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Third-Party Tested (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Other products from PetLab Co.
See all products from PetLab Co.
Community
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.