Our verdict
Is Shintospetfood Venison Dog Food a good dog food?
We score it 47/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists herring
- Your dog avoids venison: the label lists venison
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists barley
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (18)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 40.0%
- veg 34.5%
- carb 17.4%
- mineral 4.2%
- unknown 3.8%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fresh venison | Venison | meat · good | - | 7.3 |
| 2 | venison liver | Liver | meat · good | - | 7.1 |
| 3 | eggs | Egg | meat · good | - | 6.9 |
| 4 | ground organic sprouted barley seed | Barley | carb · medium | - | 6.7 |
| 5 | herring | Herring | meat · good | - | 6.5 |
| 6 | perch | Perch | meat · good | - | 6.3 |
| 7 | salmon | Salmon | meat · good | - | 6.1 |
| 8 | sweet potato | Sweet Potatoes | carb · good | - | 5.9 |
| 9 | ground fava beans | Fava Beans | veg · medium | - | 5.7 |
| 10 | ground organic sprouted flaxseed | Linseed | veg · good | - | 5.5 |
| 11 | ground organic sprouted lentils | Lentils | veg · medium | - | 5.3 |
| 12 | ground organic sprouted peas | Peas | veg · good | - | 5.1 |
| 13 | potato starch | Potato starch | carb · poor | - | 4.8 |
| 14 | apples | Apples | veg · good | - | 4.6 |
| 15 | carrots | Carrots | veg · good | - | 4.4 |
| 16 | sea salt | Sea Salt | mineral · medium | - | 4.2 |
| 17 | kelp | Kelp | veg · good | - | 4.0 |
| 18 | and baking soda. | unmatched | - | - | 3.8 |
- 1. Fresh venison7.3% estimated
- 2. venison liver7.1% estimated
- 3. eggs6.9% estimated
- 4. ground organic sprouted barley seed6.7% estimated
- 5. herring6.5% estimated
- 6. perch6.3% estimated
- 7. salmon6.1% estimated
- 8. sweet potato5.9% estimated
- 9. ground fava beans5.7% estimated
- 10. ground organic sprouted flaxseed5.5% estimated
- 11. ground organic sprouted lentils5.3% estimated
- 12. ground organic sprouted peas5.1% estimated
- 13. potato starch4.8% estimated
- 14. apples4.6% estimated
- 15. carrots4.4% estimated
- 16. sea salt4.2% estimated
- 17. kelp4.0% estimated
- 18. and baking soda.3.8% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14
Brand and contact: Shintospetfood
- Website
- https://shintospetfood.com/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-14
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- shintospetfood.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves a total score of 47 out of 100 based on several distinct factors. The overall quality of the ingredient list added +7.2 points, but ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -10.6. Additionally, the processing format decreased the total by -6.7 and the carbohydrate content resulted in a deduction of -2.6.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.16 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 22.5% | -0.115 | -2.59 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 32.4% | -0.005 | -0.17 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 5.1% | -0.027 | -0.13 |
| Recipe graded poor | 4.8% | -0.065 | -0.32 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.8% | 0.060 | +0.29 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -0.08 | 0.222 | -0.02 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.16 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 22.5% | -0.115 | -2.59 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 32.4% | -0.005 | -0.17 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.012 | +0.00 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 5.1% | -0.027 | -0.13 |
| Recipe graded poor | 4.8% | -0.065 | -0.32 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.8% | 0.060 | +0.29 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -0.08 | 0.222 | -0.02 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Subtotal
- 47.0
- Final score
- 47/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
Analytical constituents not declared
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
No on-pack claims on file: nothing to verify.
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Venison Dog Food
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.