Shintospetfood Pancreatic Support Turkey Adult Dog Recipe
Fresh Frozen · complete
Our verdict
Is Shintospetfood Pancreatic Support Turkey Adult Dog Recipe a good dog food?
We score it 59/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists turkey thigh
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists cod liver oil
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (19)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- veg 33.9%
- supplement 25.2%
- meat 20.0%
- oil 15.2%
- fibre 5.6%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Turkey Thigh | Turkey Thigh | meat · good | - | 6.9 |
| 2 | Turkey Heart | Turkey Heart | meat · good | - | 6.7 |
| 3 | Carrots | Carrots | veg · good | - | 6.5 |
| 4 | Turkey Liver | Turkey liver | meat · good | - | 6.4 |
| 5 | Zucchini | Courgette | veg · good | - | 6.2 |
| 6 | Blueberries | Blueberries | veg · good | - | 6.0 |
| 7 | Cranberries | Cranberries | veg · good | - | 5.8 |
| 8 | Psyllium Seed Husk Powder | Psyllium | fibre · good | - | 5.6 |
| 9 | Cod Liver Oil | Cod Liver Oil | oil · good | - | 5.4 |
| 10 | Egg Shell Powder | Crushed Eggshells | supplement · good | - | 5.3 |
| 11 | Extra Virgin Olive Oil | Olive oil | oil · good | - | 5.1 |
| 12 | Organic Dried Kelp | Kelp | veg · good | - | 4.9 |
| 13 | Flaxseed Oil | Linseed oil | oil · good | - | 4.7 |
| 14 | Ginger Root | Ginger | veg · good | - | 4.5 |
| 15 | Vitamin B1 (Thiamine Mononitrate) | Vitamin B complex | supplement · good | - | 4.4 |
| 16 | Vitamin B12 | Vitamin B12 | supplement · good | - | 4.2 |
| 17 | Zinc Amino Acid Chelate | Zinc Proteinate | supplement · good | - | 4.0 |
| 18 | Vitamin B5 (Calcium Pantothenate) | Vitamin B complex | supplement · good | - | 3.8 |
| 19 | Vitamin B2 (Riboflavin) | Vitamin B complex | supplement · good | - | 3.6 |
- 1. Turkey Thigh6.9% estimated
- 2. Turkey Heart6.7% estimated
- 3. Carrots6.5% estimated
- 4. Turkey Liver6.4% estimated
- 5. Zucchini6.2% estimated
- 6. Blueberries6.0% estimated
- 7. Cranberries5.8% estimated
- 8. Psyllium Seed Husk Powder5.6% estimated
- 9. Cod Liver Oil5.4% estimated
- 10. Egg Shell Powder5.3% estimated
- 11. Extra Virgin Olive Oil5.1% estimated
- 12. Organic Dried Kelp4.9% estimated
- 13. Flaxseed Oil4.7% estimated
- 14. Ginger Root4.5% estimated
- 15. Vitamin B1 (Thiamine Mononitrate)4.4% estimated
- 16. Vitamin B124.2% estimated
- 17. Zinc Amino Acid Chelate4.0% estimated
- 18. Vitamin B5 (Calcium Pantothenate)3.8% estimated
- 19. Vitamin B2 (Riboflavin)3.6% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 10% · Fat 3%
Guaranteed analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed | Dry matter | Directory average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 10% | 47% | - |
| Fat | 3% | 16% | - |
| Fibre | 6% | 23% | - |
| Moisture | 78% | - | - |
| Carbohydrates | 2.40% | 10.43% | - |
Energy: 92.6 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin B1 (Thiamine Mononitrate); Vitamin B12; Zinc Amino Acid Chelate; Vitamin B5 (Calcium Pantothenate); Vitamin B2 (Riboflavin)
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14
Brand and contact: Shintospetfood
- Website
- https://shintospetfood.com/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-14
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- shintospetfood.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
We gave this recipe a score of 59 out of 100. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +8.4 points, while ingredients without printed percentages cost -10.6 points. The processing format took -2.4 off, and the oil and fat content cost -2.3 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.9 | 9.191 | +8.39 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 24.7% | -0.092 | -2.27 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 19.9% | -0.005 | -0.10 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 38.0% | -0.012 | -0.46 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.9 | 9.191 | +8.39 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 24.7% | -0.092 | -2.27 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 19.9% | -0.005 | -0.10 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 38.0% | -0.012 | -0.46 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -1.74
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 59.1
- Final score
- 59/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 10 | 35.7 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 3 | 10.7 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 91.6 |
| Fibre | 6 | 21.4 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 92.6 | 330.7 | 100 |
Fibre: Declared as a maximum; the high-fibre taper is not applied.
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 72% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 5 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin B1 (Thiamine Mononitrate)
- Vitamin B12
- Zinc Amino Acid Chelate
- Vitamin B5 (Calcium Pantothenate)
- Vitamin B2 (Riboflavin)
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pancreatic Support (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| with only 2.40% Carbohydrates (on pack) | High/low level | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| formulated to meet the nutritional levels established by the AAFCO Dog Food Nutrient Profiles for maintenance (on pack) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Low Fat Recipe (on pack) | High/low level | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Pancreatic Support Turkey Adult Dog Recipe
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.