Our verdict
Is SHINE Pet Food Kidney Support Recipe a good dog food?
We score it 58/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Doesn't list turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken breast
- Your dog avoids beef: the label lists beef
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists cod liver oil
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists barley
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (19)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- veg 32.3%
- supplement 25.8%
- meat 24.1%
- carb 13.2%
- oil 4.5%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Organic Beef | Beef | meat · medium | - | 6.9 |
| 2 | Organic Sprouted Barley | Barley | carb · medium | - | 6.7 |
| 3 | Organic Sweet Potato | Sweet Potatoes | carb · good | - | 6.5 |
| 4 | Organic Chicken Breast | Chicken Breast | meat · good | - | 6.4 |
| 5 | Organic Egg White | Egg | meat · good | - | 6.2 |
| 6 | Organic Carrots | Carrots | veg · good | - | 6.0 |
| 7 | Organic Broccoli | Broccoli | veg · good | - | 5.8 |
| 8 | Organic Kale | Kale | veg · good | - | 5.6 |
| 9 | Organic Beets | Beetroot | veg · good | - | 5.4 |
| 10 | Calcium Magnesium Carbonate | Magnesium Oxide | supplement · good | - | 5.3 |
| 11 | Organic Black Sesame Seeds | Sesame Seeds | veg · good | - | 5.1 |
| 12 | Organic Nutritional Yeast | Yeast | supplement · good | - | 4.9 |
| 13 | Organic Beef Liver | Beef Liver | meat · good | - | 4.7 |
| 14 | Cod Liver Oil | Cod Liver Oil | oil · good | - | 4.5 |
| 15 | Organic Kelp | Kelp | veg · good | - | 4.4 |
| 16 | Vitamin E | Vitamin E | supplement · good | - | 4.2 |
| 17 | Zinc Chelate | Zinc chelate of glycine hydrate | supplement · good | - | 4.0 |
| 18 | Manganese Chelate | Manganese Glycine Chelate | supplement · good | - | 3.8 |
| 19 | Copper Chelate | Copper proteinate | supplement · good | - | 3.6 |
- 1. Organic Beef6.9% estimated
- 2. Organic Sprouted Barley6.7% estimated
- 3. Organic Sweet Potato6.5% estimated
- 4. Organic Chicken Breast6.4% estimated
- 5. Organic Egg White6.2% estimated
- 6. Organic Carrots6.0% estimated
- 7. Organic Broccoli5.8% estimated
- 8. Organic Kale5.6% estimated
- 9. Organic Beets5.4% estimated
- 10. Calcium Magnesium Carbonate5.3% estimated
- 11. Organic Black Sesame Seeds5.1% estimated
- 12. Organic Nutritional Yeast4.9% estimated
- 13. Organic Beef Liver4.7% estimated
- 14. Cod Liver Oil4.5% estimated
- 15. Organic Kelp4.4% estimated
- 16. Vitamin E4.2% estimated
- 17. Zinc Chelate4.0% estimated
- 18. Manganese Chelate3.8% estimated
- 19. Copper Chelate3.6% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 9% · Fat 3.20%
Guaranteed analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed | Dry matter | Directory average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 9% | 27% | - |
| Fat | 3.20% | 7.80% | - |
| Fibre | 1.20% | 2.20% | - |
| Moisture | 73.60% | 8.60% | - |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Ships in a closeable compostable paper bag; after receiving, store in an airtight reusable container. Rehydrated food must be used within 3-5 days to maintain freshness.
Feeding guide
Rehydrate the food with warm water or broth, let sit 10-15 min before serving. Can be used as a maintenance recipe or modified by a veterinarian.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin E; Zinc Chelate; Manganese Chelate; Copper Chelate
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19
Brand and contact: SHINE Pet Food
- Website
- https://shine.pet/
- [email protected]
- Address
- 506 West Cordova Road, Santa Fe, NM 87505; 2795 Iris Ave. Willow Springs Shopping Center, Boulder, CO 80304
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- shine.pet
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves a total score of 58 out of 100 based on several key factors. The overall quality of the ingredient list adds +7.7 points, and being labelled nutritionally complete contributes an additional +2.3 points. However, ingredients without printed percentages deduct -10.6 points, and the carbohydrate content further reduces the score by -1.7 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.69 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 14.9% | -0.115 | -1.71 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 8.9% | -0.092 | -0.82 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 16.0% | -0.005 | -0.08 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 46.8% | -0.012 | -0.57 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.69 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 14.9% | -0.115 | -1.71 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 8.9% | -0.092 | -0.82 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 16.0% | -0.005 | -0.08 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 46.8% | -0.012 | -0.57 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 58.0
- Final score
- 58/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 9 | 34.1 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 3.2 | 12.1 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 97.4 |
| Fibre | 1.2 | 4.5 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 4 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin E
- Zinc Chelate
- Manganese Chelate
- Copper Chelate
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Certified Organic by SCS Global Services (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| neutral grass-fed, finished (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| highly digestible and tasty diet (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| moderate in protein and low in phosphorus (on pack) | High/low level | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| supports kidney function (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| emphasizes a good balance of nutrients—particularly B vitamins and arginine, which both directly support kidney function (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| basic proteins are beef, chicken breast, and egg whites (no ground bone or organ meat, to reduce phosphorus) (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| organic non-gmo (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| developed with organic ingredients and by veterinarian Dr. Kim Freeman (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Kidney Support Recipe
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.