Our verdict
Is SHINE Pet Food Gently Cooked Venison Recipe a good dog food?
We score it 57/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Single named protein: venison
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists millet
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (18)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- veg 37.4%
- supplement 22.8%
- meat 20.0%
- carb 13.9%
- oil 5.9%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Venison | Venison | meat · good | - | 7.3 |
| 2 | Organic Sprouted Millet | Millet | carb · good | - | 7.1 |
| 3 | Organic Sweet Potatoes | Sweet Potatoes | carb · good | - | 6.9 |
| 4 | Organic Carrots | Carrots | veg · good | - | 6.7 |
| 5 | Venison Heart | Heart | meat · good | - | 6.5 |
| 6 | Venison Liver | Liver | meat · good | - | 6.3 |
| 7 | Organic Bok Choy | Bok Choy | veg · good | - | 6.1 |
| 8 | Organic Coconut Oil | Coconut Oil | oil · medium | - | 5.9 |
| 9 | Organic Parsley | Parsley | veg · good | - | 5.7 |
| 10 | Dicalcium Phosphate | Dicalcium phosphate | supplement · medium | - | 5.5 |
| 11 | Calcium Magnesium Carbonate | Magnesium Oxide | supplement · good | - | 5.3 |
| 12 | Organic Celery | Celery Seeds | veg · good | - | 5.1 |
| 13 | Organic Kale | Kale | veg · good | - | 4.8 |
| 14 | Organic Squash | Butternut Squash | veg · good | - | 4.6 |
| 15 | Organic Kelp | Kelp | veg · good | - | 4.4 |
| 16 | Vitamin E | Vitamin E | supplement · good | - | 4.2 |
| 17 | Zinc Chelate | Zinc chelate of glycine hydrate | supplement · good | - | 4.0 |
| 18 | Manganese Chelate | Manganese Glycine Chelate | supplement · good | - | 3.8 |
- 1. Venison7.3% estimated
- 2. Organic Sprouted Millet7.1% estimated
- 3. Organic Sweet Potatoes6.9% estimated
- 4. Organic Carrots6.7% estimated
- 5. Venison Heart6.5% estimated
- 6. Venison Liver6.3% estimated
- 7. Organic Bok Choy6.1% estimated
- 8. Organic Coconut Oil5.9% estimated
- 9. Organic Parsley5.7% estimated
- 10. Dicalcium Phosphate5.5% estimated
- 11. Calcium Magnesium Carbonate5.3% estimated
- 12. Organic Celery5.1% estimated
- 13. Organic Kale4.8% estimated
- 14. Organic Squash4.6% estimated
- 15. Organic Kelp4.4% estimated
- 16. Vitamin E4.2% estimated
- 17. Zinc Chelate4.0% estimated
- 18. Manganese Chelate3.8% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 11.50% · Fat 4.50%
Guaranteed analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 11.50% |
| Fat | 4.50% |
| Fibre | 0.60% |
| Moisture | 72% |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Recipes are best when used within 6 months of production date. Thaw before feeding. Thaw in your refrigerator. Serve within 5 days.
Feeding guide
Thaw the food in the refrigerator before feeding. Scoop it into the bowl—we recommend stainless steel or ceramic. Pour some warm water or broth over it to bring it to room temperature.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin E; Zinc Chelate; Manganese Chelate
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19
Brand and contact: SHINE Pet Food
- Website
- https://shine.pet/
- [email protected]
- Address
- 506 West Cordova Road, Santa Fe, NM 87505; 2795 Iris Ave. Willow Springs Shopping Center, Boulder, CO 80304
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- shine.pet
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The score is 57 out of 100. Undeclared ingredient shares, meaning ingredients without printed percentages, contributed -10.6. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +7.5, and the processing format contributed -2.4. Being labelled nutritionally complete contributed +2.3.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.46 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 16.1% | -0.115 | -1.85 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 11.8% | -0.092 | -1.08 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 18.1% | -0.005 | -0.09 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 42.6% | -0.012 | -0.52 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.46 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 16.1% | -0.115 | -1.85 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 11.8% | -0.092 | -1.08 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 18.1% | -0.005 | -0.09 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 42.6% | -0.012 | -0.52 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -1.74
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 57.5
- Final score
- 57/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 11.5 | 41.1 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 4.5 | 16.1 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 0.6 | 2.1 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 91.9 |
Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 72% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 3 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin E
- Zinc Chelate
- Manganese Chelate
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "rich in lean, high-quality protein" — supported by the declared high protein data.
3 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| sustainably-sourced (on page) | provenance | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| great for active dogs or those with food sensitivities (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| pasture-raised, human-grade New Zealand venison (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| rich in lean, high-quality protein (on page) | High/low level | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Gently Cooked Venison Recipe
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.