SHINE Pet Food Gently Cooked Pork Dog Recipe
Dry Freeze Dried · complete
Our verdict
Is SHINE Pet Food Gently Cooked Pork Dog Recipe a good dog food?
We score it 66/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Single named protein: pork
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists millet
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (14)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- supplement 42.9%
- veg 30.2%
- carb 17.6%
- meat 9.3%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pork | Pork | meat · medium | - | 9.3 |
| 2 | Organic Sprouted Millet | Millet | carb · good | - | 9.0 |
| 3 | Organic Sweet Potatoes | Sweet Potatoes | carb · good | - | 8.6 |
| 4 | Organic Carrots | Carrots | veg · good | - | 8.3 |
| 5 | Organic Bok Choy | Bok Choy | veg · good | - | 8.0 |
| 6 | Organic Parsley | Parsley | veg · good | - | 7.6 |
| 7 | Dicalcium Phosphate | Dicalcium phosphate | supplement · medium | - | 7.3 |
| 8 | Calcium Carbonate | Calcium Carbonate | supplement · medium | - | 7.0 |
| 9 | Magnesium Carbonate | Magnesium Oxide | supplement · good | - | 6.6 |
| 10 | Organic Kelp | Kelp | veg · good | - | 6.3 |
| 11 | dl-Alpha Tocopheryl Acetate (source of Vitamin E) | Vitamin E | supplement · good | - | 6.0 |
| 12 | Zinc Amino Acid Chelate | Zinc Proteinate | supplement · good | - | 5.6 |
| 13 | Manganese Amino Acid Chelate | Manganese proteinate | supplement · good | - | 5.3 |
| 14 | Copper Amino Acid Chelate | Copper proteinate | supplement · good | - | 5.0 |
- 1. Pork9.3% estimated
- 2. Organic Sprouted Millet9.0% estimated
- 3. Organic Sweet Potatoes8.6% estimated
- 4. Organic Carrots8.3% estimated
- 5. Organic Bok Choy8.0% estimated
- 6. Organic Parsley7.6% estimated
- 7. Dicalcium Phosphate7.3% estimated
- 8. Calcium Carbonate7.0% estimated
- 9. Magnesium Carbonate6.6% estimated
- 10. Organic Kelp6.3% estimated
- 11. dl-Alpha Tocopheryl Acetate (source of Vitamin E)6.0% estimated
- 12. Zinc Amino Acid Chelate5.6% estimated
- 13. Manganese Amino Acid Chelate5.3% estimated
- 14. Copper Amino Acid Chelate5.0% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 33.50% · Fat 13.50%
Guaranteed analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 33.50% |
| Fat | 13.50% |
| Fibre | 2.20% |
| Moisture | 9.70% |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Shipped in a closeable compostable paper bag; transfer to an airtight reusable container after receiving. Rehydrated food must be used within 3-5 days. Wash hands, utensils, surfaces and bowls. Keep away from children.
Feeding guide
Rehydrate the food by mixing in warm water or broth and let sit 10-15 minutes before serving. See feeding chart link for more information.
No additives recorded yet.
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19
Brand and contact: SHINE Pet Food
- Website
- https://shine.pet/
- [email protected]
- Address
- 506 West Cordova Road, Santa Fe, NM 87505; 2795 Iris Ave. Willow Springs Shopping Center, Boulder, CO 80304
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- shine.pet
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The overall score is 66 out of 100. The score was reduced by -10.6 points for undeclared ingredient shares, meaning the product lists ingredients without printed percentages. It was lifted by +7.1 points for the overall quality of the ingredient list and by +6.6 points for the processing format. The carbohydrate content pulled it back by -1.9 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.10 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 16.4% | -0.115 | -1.89 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 15.1% | -0.005 | -0.08 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 64.3% | -0.012 | -0.78 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.11 | 33.786 | +37.50 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | yes | 6.629 | +6.63 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.10 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 16.4% | -0.115 | -1.89 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 15.1% | -0.005 | -0.08 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 64.3% | -0.012 | -0.78 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.11 | 33.786 | +37.50 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | yes | 6.629 | +6.63 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.06
- Subtotal
- 65.7
- Final score
- 66/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 33.5 | 35.6 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 13.5 | 14.4 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 2.2 | 2.3 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 94.5 |
Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 6% from the food type.
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| wild-harvested (on page) | provenance | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Pork is a high-quality, highly digestible protein that supports lean muscles, healthy energy, and tissue repair (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| slow, careful cooking preserves taste and nutrients so every bite is truly wholesome (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| human-grade (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| cooling sustainably-sourced (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| It's naturally rich in B vitamins, zinc, and iron for immune support and overall wellness (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Prepared fresh every week in our Santa Fe, New Mexico kitchen and freeze dried (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Gently Cooked Pork Dog Recipe
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.