Our verdict
Is SHINE Pet Food Gently Cooked Beef Recipe a good dog food?
We score it 54/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Single named protein: beef
- Doesn't list chicken, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists barley
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (17)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- veg 35.7%
- supplement 29.0%
- carb 14.7%
- meat 14.3%
- oil 6.3%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Organic Beef | Beef | meat · medium | - | 7.7 |
| 2 | Organic Sprouted Barley | Barley | carb · medium | - | 7.5 |
| 3 | Organic Sweet Potatoes | Sweet Potatoes | carb · good | - | 7.2 |
| 4 | Organic Carrots | Carrots | veg · good | - | 7.0 |
| 5 | Organic Bok Choy | Bok Choy | veg · good | - | 6.8 |
| 6 | Organic Beef Liver | Beef Liver | meat · good | - | 6.6 |
| 7 | Algae Oil | Algae Oil | oil · good | - | 6.3 |
| 8 | Dicalcium Phosphate | Dicalcium phosphate | supplement · medium | - | 6.1 |
| 9 | Organic Parsley | Parsley | veg · good | - | 5.9 |
| 10 | Organic Kale | Kale | veg · good | - | 5.7 |
| 11 | Organic Beets | Beetroot | veg · good | - | 5.4 |
| 12 | Calcium Carbonate | Calcium Carbonate | supplement · medium | - | 5.2 |
| 13 | Organic Kelp | Kelp | veg · good | - | 5.0 |
| 14 | Zinc Chelate | Zinc chelate of glycine hydrate | supplement · good | - | 4.8 |
| 15 | Vitamin E | Vitamin E | supplement · good | - | 4.5 |
| 16 | Manganese Chelate | Manganese Glycine Chelate | supplement · good | - | 4.3 |
| 17 | Copper Chelate | Copper proteinate | supplement · good | - | 4.1 |
- 1. Organic Beef7.7% estimated
- 2. Organic Sprouted Barley7.5% estimated
- 3. Organic Sweet Potatoes7.2% estimated
- 4. Organic Carrots7.0% estimated
- 5. Organic Bok Choy6.8% estimated
- 6. Organic Beef Liver6.6% estimated
- 7. Algae Oil6.3% estimated
- 8. Dicalcium Phosphate6.1% estimated
- 9. Organic Parsley5.9% estimated
- 10. Organic Kale5.7% estimated
- 11. Organic Beets5.4% estimated
- 12. Calcium Carbonate5.2% estimated
- 13. Organic Kelp5.0% estimated
- 14. Zinc Chelate4.8% estimated
- 15. Vitamin E4.5% estimated
- 16. Manganese Chelate4.3% estimated
- 17. Copper Chelate4.1% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 11% · Fat 5.50%
Guaranteed analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 11% |
| Fat | 5.50% |
| Fibre | 1% |
| Moisture | 74% |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Recipes are best when used within 6 months of production date. Thaw before feeding. Thaw in your refrigerator. Serve within 5 days.
Feeding guide
Thaw the food in the refrigerator before feeding. Scoop it into the bowl — stainless steel or ceramic recommended. Pour warm water or broth over it to bring it to room temperature.
No additives recorded yet.
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19
Brand and contact: SHINE Pet Food
- Website
- https://shine.pet/
- [email protected]
- Address
- 506 West Cordova Road, Santa Fe, NM 87505; 2795 Iris Ave. Willow Springs Shopping Center, Boulder, CO 80304
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- shine.pet
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The product reached a score of 54 out of 100. Ingredients without printed percentages weighed on the result, contributing -10.6 points, while the overall quality of the ingredient list lifted it by +7. The processing format dragged the score down by -2.4 points, and the carbohydrate content reduced it further by -1.8 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +6.99 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 15.4% | -0.115 | -1.77 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 11.5% | -0.092 | -1.06 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 16.7% | -0.005 | -0.09 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 49.0% | -0.012 | -0.60 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +6.99 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 15.4% | -0.115 | -1.77 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 11.5% | -0.092 | -1.06 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 16.7% | -0.005 | -0.09 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 49.0% | -0.012 | -0.60 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -1.74
- Subtotal
- 53.7
- Final score
- 54/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 11 | 39.3 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 5.5 | 19.6 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 1 | 3.6 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 72% from the food type.
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| animal-welfare certified (on pack) | provenance | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| supporting lean muscle, healthy skin and coat, and overall vitality (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| organic non-gmo (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Certified Organic by SCS Global Services (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| rich in high-quality protein (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Gently Cooked Beef Recipe
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.