Royal Canin US Appetite Stimulation Fresh Frozen Dog Food
Fresh Frozen · complete
Our verdict
Is Royal Canin US Appetite Stimulation Fresh Frozen Dog Food a good dog food?
We score it 50/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, venison, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists fish oil
- Your dog avoids pork: the label lists pork
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (29)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- supplement 30.6%
- additive 19.1%
- veg 15.4%
- mineral 13.5%
- meat 8.9%
- oil 8.1%
- carb 4.5%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chicken | Chicken | meat · medium | - | 4.5 |
| 2 | russet potatoes | Potatoes | carb · medium | - | 4.5 |
| 3 | pork | Pork | meat · medium | - | 4.4 |
| 4 | green beans | Green Beans | veg · good | - | 4.3 |
| 5 | kale | Kale | veg · good | - | 4.2 |
| 6 | Cremini mushrooms | Mushrooms | veg · good | - | 4.2 |
| 7 | vegetable oil | Vegetable oil | oil · medium | - | 4.1 |
| 8 | fish oil | Fish Oil | oil · good | - | 4.0 |
| 9 | calcium carbonate | Calcium Carbonate | supplement · medium | - | 3.9 |
| 10 | vinegar | Vinegar | additive · poor | - | 3.8 |
| 11 | citric acid | Citric Acid | additive · medium | - | 3.8 |
| 12 | salt | Salt | additive · poor | - | 3.7 |
| 13 | magnesium phosphate | Magnesium Phosphate | mineral · good | - | 3.6 |
| 14 | zinc gluconate | Zinc Oxide | supplement · good | - | 3.5 |
| 15 | iron amino acid chelate | Iron Proteinate | mineral · good | - | 3.4 |
| 16 | potassium iodide | Potassium iodide | supplement · good | - | 3.4 |
| 17 | copper gluconate | Copper | mineral · good | - | 3.3 |
| 18 | manganese gluconate | Manganese | supplement · good | - | 3.2 |
| 19 | selenium amino acid chelate | Selenium | mineral · good | - | 3.1 |
| 20 | vitamins [vitamin E (a-tocopherol acetate), vitamin C (L-ascorbyl-2-polyphosphate), vitamin B12 supplement, vitamin E supplement, niacin supplement, thiamine mononitrate, vitamin B6 (pyridoxine hydrochloride), riboflavin supplement, vitamin B9 (folic acid), vitamin A (vitamin A palmitate), vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol), vitamin B5 (calcium pantothenate)] | Thiamine mononitrate | supplement · good | - | 3.1 |
| 21 | choline (choline chloride) | Choline | supplement · good | - | 3.0 |
| 22 | taurine | Taurine | supplement · good | - | 2.9 |
| 23 | L-arginine | L-Arginine | supplement · good | - | 2.8 |
| 24 | yeast extract | Hydrolysed Yeast | additive · medium | - | 2.7 |
| 25 | marigold extract (Tagetes erecta L.) | Calendula | veg · good | - | 2.7 |
| 26 | natural flavors | Flavor | additive · poor | - | 2.6 |
| 27 | tocopherols | Tocopherols | additive · good | - | 2.5 |
| 28 | glucosamine hydrochloride | Glucosamine | supplement · good | - | 2.4 |
| 29 | chondroitin sulfate. | Chondroitin | supplement · good | - | 2.4 |
- 1. Chicken4.5% estimated
- 2. russet potatoes4.5% estimated
- 3. pork4.4% estimated
- 4. green beans4.3% estimated
- 5. kale4.2% estimated
- 6. Cremini mushrooms4.2% estimated
- 7. vegetable oil4.1% estimated
- 8. fish oil4.0% estimated
- 9. calcium carbonate3.9% estimated
- 10. vinegar3.8% estimated
- 11. citric acid3.8% estimated
- 12. salt3.7% estimated
- 13. magnesium phosphate3.6% estimated
- 14. zinc gluconate3.5% estimated
- 15. iron amino acid chelate3.4% estimated
- 16. potassium iodide3.4% estimated
- 17. copper gluconate3.3% estimated
- 18. manganese gluconate3.2% estimated
- 19. selenium amino acid chelate3.1% estimated
- 20. vitamins [vitamin E (a-tocopherol acetate), vitamin C (L-ascorbyl-2-polyphosphate), vitamin B12 supplement, vitamin E supplement, niacin supplement, thiamine mononitrate, vitamin B6 (pyridoxine hydrochloride), riboflavin supplement, vitamin B9 (folic acid), vitamin A (vitamin A palmitate), vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol), vitamin B5 (calcium pantothenate)]3.1% estimated
- 21. choline (choline chloride)3.0% estimated
- 22. taurine2.9% estimated
- 23. L-arginine2.8% estimated
- 24. yeast extract2.7% estimated
- 25. marigold extract (Tagetes erecta L.)2.7% estimated
- 26. natural flavors2.6% estimated
- 27. tocopherols2.5% estimated
- 28. glucosamine hydrochloride2.4% estimated
- 29. chondroitin sulfate.2.4% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 10.50% · Fat 6%
Guaranteed analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 10.50% |
| Fat | 6% |
| Fibre | 2.50% |
| Moisture | 76.50% |
| Omega-3 fatty acids | 0.55% |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Store in the freezer until ready to use. Thaw in refrigerator 24 hours before serving. Keep remaining portions refrigerated for up to 5 days.
No additives recorded yet.
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-30
Brand and contact: Royal Canin US
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-30
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.royalcanin.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves a total score of 50 out of 100 based on several key factors. The presence of ingredients without printed percentages contributed -10.6 to the overall rating, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added +5.6. Furthermore, the additive load contributed -5.1, and the additives in the recipe adjusted the score by +3.9.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.61 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 1.6% | -0.115 | -0.18 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 11.1% | -0.092 | -1.02 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 3.2% | -0.005 | -0.02 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 23.9% | 0.163 | +3.89 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 39.0% | -0.012 | -0.48 |
| Recipe graded poor | 10.1% | -0.065 | -0.66 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 3 | -0.876 | -2.63 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 3.8% | 0.060 | +0.23 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -23.10 | 0.222 | -5.13 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.61 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 1.6% | -0.115 | -0.18 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 11.1% | -0.092 | -1.02 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 3.2% | -0.005 | -0.02 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 23.9% | 0.163 | +3.89 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 39.0% | -0.012 | -0.48 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 10.1% | -0.065 | -0.66 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 3 | -0.876 | -2.63 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 3.8% | 0.060 | +0.23 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -23.10 | 0.222 | -5.13 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -1.74
- Subtotal
- 49.9
- Final score
- 50/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 10.5 | 37.5 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 6 | 21.4 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 2.5 | 8.9 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
Fibre: Declared as a maximum; the high-fibre taper is not applied.
Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 72% from the food type.
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| highly palatable, high-calorie, high-protein recipe to promote healthy weight gain (on page) | High/low level | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| immunity complex to help support recovery when natural defenses are down (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| helps prevent further weight loss (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| omega-3 fatty acids and is enriched with EPA & DHA (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| high-quality protein from pork and chicken (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| a complete and balanced diet (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Nourish your dog's microbiome and support their digestion (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Appetite Stimulation Fresh Frozen Dog Food
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.