RAWZ Shredded Chicken Breast, Duck & New Zealand Green Mussels Dog Food Recipe
Wet Chunks · complete
Our verdict
Is RAWZ Shredded Chicken Breast, Duck & New Zealand Green Mussels Dog Food Recipe a good dog food?
We score it 56/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Declared analysis sits below the FEDIAF minimum for fat.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists mussels
- Your dog avoids duck: the label lists duck
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (12)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 39.6%
- supplement 28.4%
- other 9.9%
- carb 8.6%
- oil 7.7%
- additive 5.9%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chicken | Chicken | meat · medium | - | 10.8 |
| 2 | Chicken Broth | Chicken Broth | meat · medium | - | 10.4 |
| 3 | Water Sufficient for Processing | Water | other | - | 9.9 |
| 4 | Duck | Duck | meat · medium | - | 9.5 |
| 5 | New Zealand Green Mussels | Mussels | meat · good | - | 9.0 |
| 6 | Tapioca Starch | Tapioca Starch | carb · medium | - | 8.6 |
| 7 | Tricalcium Phosphate | Tricalcium phosphate | supplement · good | - | 8.1 |
| 8 | Sunflower Oil | Sunflower oil | oil · good | - | 7.7 |
| 9 | Calcium Chloride | Calcium Carbonate | supplement · medium | - | 7.2 |
| 10 | Potassium Chloride | Potassium Chloride | supplement · medium | - | 6.8 |
| 11 | Choline Chloride | Choline | supplement · good | - | 6.3 |
| 12 | Salt | Salt | additive · poor | - | 5.9 |
- 1. Chicken10.8% estimated
- 2. Chicken Broth10.4% estimated
- 3. Water Sufficient for Processing9.9% estimated
- 4. Duck9.5% estimated
- 5. New Zealand Green Mussels9.0% estimated
- 6. Tapioca Starch8.6% estimated
- 7. Tricalcium Phosphate8.1% estimated
- 8. Sunflower Oil7.7% estimated
- 9. Calcium Chloride7.2% estimated
- 10. Potassium Chloride6.8% estimated
- 11. Choline Chloride6.3% estimated
- 12. Salt5.9% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 9% · Fat 1%
Declared analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed | Dry matter | Directory average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 9% | 67.77% | - |
| Fat | 1% | 8.98% | - |
| Fibre | 1.50% | - | - |
| Ash | - | 9.08% | - |
| Moisture | 84% | - | - |
| Carbohydrates | 2.55% | 14.17% | - |
| Omega-3 fatty acids | 0.07% | - | - |
| Omega-6 fatty acids | 0.39% | - | - |
| Calcium | 0.28% | - | - |
| Phosphorus | 0.22% | - | - |
| Sodium | 0.06% | - | - |
Energy: 69 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Promptly refrigerate the unused portion.
Feeding guide
ADULT (Normal Resting Activity): 1 oz per lb body weight per day. ADULT (Active): 1.25 oz per lb body weight per day. ADULT (Highly Active/outdoor): 1.5 oz per lb body weight per day. Combination feeding: feed 1/3 cup less dry food for every 1/2 can of wet food.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Iron Amino Acid Chelate; Manganese Amino Acid Chelate; Zinc Amino Acid Chelate; Calcium Iodate; Copper Amino Acid Chelate; Sodium Selenite; Vitamin A Supplement; Vitamin D3 Supplement; Vitamin E Supplement; Thiamine Mononitrate; Riboflavin; Pyridoxine Hydrochloride; Vitamin B12 Supplement; Niacin Supplement; d-Calcium Pantothenate; Ascorbic Acid (source of Vitamin C); Folic Acid; Biotin
Technological additives
Ascorbic Acid (natural preservative)
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-13
Brand and contact: RAWZ
- Phone
- 1-844-480-8672
- Address
- RAWZ Natural Pet Food, 28 Long Sands Road 6B, York, Maine 03909
- Contact page
- rawznaturalpetfood.com
- Social
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-13
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- rawznaturalpetfood.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The overall score is 56 out of 100. Undeclared ingredient shares, meaning ingredients without printed percentages, contributed -10.6 points against the score. Overall ingredient quality, referring to the overall quality of the ingredient list, contributed +4.9 points. Complete recipe, being labelled nutritionally complete, contributed +2.3 points, and printed percentages, meaning printing percentages for most of the recipe, contributed +2 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.89 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 4.3% | -0.115 | -0.49 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 15.1% | -0.092 | -1.39 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 10.5% | 0.163 | +1.71 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 52.1% | -0.012 | -0.64 |
| Recipe graded poor | 5.9% | -0.065 | -0.38 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 5.9% | 0.060 | +0.35 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -7.14 | 0.222 | -1.59 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.89 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 4.3% | -0.115 | -0.49 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 15.1% | -0.092 | -1.39 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.005 | +0.00 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 10.5% | 0.163 | +1.71 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 52.1% | -0.012 | -0.64 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 5.9% | -0.065 | -0.38 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 5.9% | 0.060 | +0.35 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -7.14 | 0.222 | -1.59 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 56.1
- Final score
- 56/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 9 | 42.9 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 1 | 4.8 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 60.6 |
| Fibre | 1.5 | 7.1 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Calcium | 0.28 | 1.3 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 95 |
| Phosphorus | 0.22 | 1 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 100 |
| Sodium | 0.06 | 0.3 (band 0.1+%) | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.3 | 1.3 (band 1 to 2%) | 86.4 |
| Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3) | - | - | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 69 | 328.6 | 100 |
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.
Scored over 9 declared nutrients (combined weight 105); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 79% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 18 nutritional additives on the label
- Iron Amino Acid Chelate
- Manganese Amino Acid Chelate
- Zinc Amino Acid Chelate
- Calcium Iodate
- Copper Amino Acid Chelate
- Sodium Selenite
- Vitamin A Supplement
- Vitamin D3 Supplement
- Vitamin E Supplement
- Thiamine Mononitrate
- Riboflavin
- Pyridoxine Hydrochloride
- Vitamin B12 Supplement
- Niacin Supplement
- d-Calcium Pantothenate
- Ascorbic Acid (source of Vitamin C)
- Folic Acid
- Biotin
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 2 checkable claims: 2 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "100% nutritionally complete" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
- "High in protein, Vitamin A and B12, but low in fat" — supported by the declared high protein data.
7 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aid in reducing joint pain (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| NO BPA used in can linings (on pack) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| NO Gums (on pack) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Natural anti-inflammatory containing Omega 3's (DHA and EPA), zinc and magnesium (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| NO antibiotics added (on pack) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100% nutritionally complete (on pack) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100% profits donated (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Low fat chicken is the first ingredient (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| High in protein, Vitamin A and B12, but low in fat (on page) | High/low level | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Shredded Chicken Breast, Duck & New Zealand Green Mussels Dog Food Recipe
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.