Is RAWZ Chicken Breast & Duck Dog Food Recipe a good dog food?
We score it 55/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Why this score?
The product scored 55 out of 100. Undeclared ingredient shares cost -10.6 points, because ingredients without printed percentages cannot be weighed against each other. Overall ingredient quality added +5.3 points to the score, and being labelled nutritionally complete contributed a further +2.3. The remaining ingredients reduced the score by -1.9 points.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
- Recipe55
- Nutritionalmedium96
- Transparency60
- Safety100
- EvidenceNot recorded
The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.
Why you might choose it
- Meat makes up an estimated 56% of the dry matter (39% as fed).
- Doesn't list grain ingredients.
- Declares energy content, which most labels omit.
Why you might not
- 100% of the recipe mass has no printed percentage, so the exact split cannot be verified.
Estimated composition
Typical analysis (as fed)
- Protein
- 11%
- Fat
- 1.50%
- Fibre
- 1.50%
- Ash
- 2.25%
- Moisture
- 82%
- Carbohydrates
- 0.10%
- Omega-3 fatty acids
- 0.02%
- Omega-6 fatty acids
- 0.44%
- Calcium
- 0.39%
- Phosphorus
- 0.23%
- Sodium
- 0.12%
Energy: 79.9 kcal/100g
Dry matter basis
- Protein
- 70.53%
- Fat
- 15.25%
- Fibre
- 3.98%
- Ash
- 9.80%
- Carbohydrates
- 0.44%
Additives & feeding info
Nutritional additives
Zinc Amino Acid Chelate; Iron Amino Acid Chelate; Manganese Amino Acid Chelate; Copper Amino Acid Chelate; Calcium Iodate; Sodium Selenite; Ascorbic Acid (source of Vitamin C); Thiamine Mononitrate; Vitamin E Supplement; Niacin Supplement; Vitamin A Supplement; d-Calcium Pantothenate; Riboflavin; Pyridoxine Hydrochloride; Folic Acid; Biotin; Vitamin B12 Supplement; Vitamin D3 Supplement; Choline Chloride
Storage
Promptly refrigerate the unused portion. Food should be fed at room temperature.
Feeding guide
ADULT (Normal Resting Activity): Feed 1 ounce for each lb. of body weight per day. ADULT (Active): Feed 1.25 ounces per lb. of body weight per day. ADULT (Highly Active and/or outdoor pets): Feed 1.5 ounces per lb. of body weight per day. Adjust amount based on age, size and activity level.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
- Your dog avoids duck: the label lists duck
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (6)
Brand
- Phone
- 1-844-480-8672
- Address
- RAWZ Natural Pet Food, 28 Long Sands Road 6B, York, Maine 03909
- Contact page
- rawznaturalpetfood.com
- Social
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-13
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- rawznaturalpetfood.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Scored with model v3 on 2026-09-26. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.31 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 15.9% | -0.115 | -1.83 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 23.2% | -0.005 | -0.12 |
| Other share of dry matter | 5.0% | -0.375 | -1.87 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.31 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 15.9% | -0.115 | -1.83 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 23.2% | -0.005 | -0.12 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.012 | +0.00 |
| Other share of dry matter | 5.0% | -0.375 | -1.87 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 55.0
- Final score
- 55/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 11 | 50 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 1.5 | 6.8 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 75.5 |
| Fibre | 1.5 | 6.8 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Calcium | 0.39 | 1.8 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 100 |
| Phosphorus | 0.23 | 1 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.7 | 1.7 (band 1 to 2%) | 100 |
| Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3) | - | - | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 79.9 | 363.2 | 100 |
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.
Scored over 8 declared nutrients (combined weight 100); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 78% from the food type.
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| NO Cassia/Locust Bean (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100% nutritionally complete (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| NO Guar Gum (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| NO Xanthan Gum (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| NO Agar Agar (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| NO Antibiotics Added (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| NO Carrageenan (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| NO Potato Starch (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| NO Gums (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Minimally processed, without the use of artificial binders or gums (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100% profits donated (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| NO BPA used in pouch linings (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Real meat is the first ingredient (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Other products from RAWZ
Alternatives to Chicken Breast & Duck Dog Food Recipe
Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.
Community
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.