Our verdict
Is RAWZ 96% Beef & Beef Liver Dog Food a good dog food?
We score it 57/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Single named protein: beef
- Doesn't list chicken, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (11)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- supplement 41.7%
- meat 23.0%
- other 17.6%
- veg 9.6%
- additive 8.0%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beef | Beef | meat · medium | - | 11.8 |
| 2 | Beef Liver | Beef Liver | meat · good | - | 11.2 |
| 3 | Beef Broth | Cooking broth | other · medium | - | 10.7 |
| 4 | Tricalcium Phosphate | Tricalcium phosphate | supplement · good | - | 10.2 |
| 5 | Fenugreek Seed | Fenugreek | veg · good | - | 9.6 |
| 6 | Potassium Chloride | Potassium Chloride | supplement · medium | - | 9.1 |
| 7 | Calcium Carbonate | Calcium Carbonate | supplement · medium | - | 8.6 |
| 8 | Salt | Salt | additive · poor | - | 8.0 |
| 9 | Taurine | Taurine | supplement · good | - | 7.5 |
| 10 | Vegetable Broth | Vegetable Broth | other · medium | - | 7.0 |
| 11 | Choline Chloride | Choline | supplement · good | - | 6.4 |
- 1. Beef11.8% estimated
- 2. Beef Liver11.2% estimated
- 3. Beef Broth10.7% estimated
- 4. Tricalcium Phosphate10.2% estimated
- 5. Fenugreek Seed9.6% estimated
- 6. Potassium Chloride9.1% estimated
- 7. Calcium Carbonate8.6% estimated
- 8. Salt8.0% estimated
- 9. Taurine7.5% estimated
- 10. Vegetable Broth7.0% estimated
- 11. Choline Chloride6.4% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 12.40% · Fat 12.60%
Declared analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed | Dry matter | Directory average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 12.40% | 45.09% | - |
| Fat | 12.60% | 45.82% | - |
| Fibre | 0.16% | 0.58% | - |
| Ash | 2.11% | 7.68% | - |
| Moisture | 78% | - | - |
| Carbohydrates | 0.23% | 0.83% | - |
| Omega-3 fatty acids | 0.09% | - | - |
| Calcium | 0.43% | - | - |
| Phosphorus | 0.38% | - | - |
| Sodium | 0.18% | - | - |
Energy: 113 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Feed at room temperature; promptly refrigerate the unused portion.
Feeding guide
Adult (normal resting activity): 1 oz per lb body weight per day. Active: 1.25 oz/lb/day. Highly active/outdoor: 1.5 oz/lb/day. Puppy: up to twice adult amount. Gestation & lactation: up to three times adult amount. Combination feeding: 1/3 cup less dry food per 1/2 can wet.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Iron Proteinate; Zinc Proteinate; Manganese Proteinate; Copper Proteinate; Magnesium Proteinate; Sodium Selenite; Calcium Iodate; Vitamin E Supplement; Thiamine Mononitrate; Niacin Supplement; Calcium Pantothenate; Biotin; Vitamin A Supplement; Riboflavin Supplement; Vitamin D3 Supplement; Vitamin B12 Supplement; Pyridoxine Hydrochloride; Folic Acid
Technological additives
Mixed Tocopherols (preservative in marine microalgae oil)
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-13
Brand and contact: RAWZ
- Phone
- 1-844-480-8672
- Address
- RAWZ Natural Pet Food, 28 Long Sands Road 6B, York, Maine 03909
- Contact page
- rawznaturalpetfood.com
- Social
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-13
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- rawznaturalpetfood.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The food scored 57 out of 100. Ingredients without printed percentages pulled the score down by -10.6, while the overall quality of the ingredient list lifted it by +5.1. Being labelled nutritionally complete added a further +2.3 points, and the additive load took off -2.2.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.09 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 14.1% | -0.005 | -0.07 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 11.7% | 0.163 | +1.91 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 62.3% | -0.012 | -0.76 |
| Other share of dry matter | 1.4% | -0.375 | -0.54 |
| Recipe graded poor | 8.0% | -0.065 | -0.52 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 8.0% | 0.060 | +0.48 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -9.79 | 0.222 | -2.17 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.09 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 14.1% | -0.005 | -0.07 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 11.7% | 0.163 | +1.91 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 62.3% | -0.012 | -0.76 |
| Other share of dry matter | 1.4% | -0.375 | -0.54 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 8.0% | -0.065 | -0.52 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 8.0% | 0.060 | +0.48 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -9.79 | 0.222 | -2.17 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 57.1
- Final score
- 57/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 12.4 | 56.4 (band 23.11363636363636 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 12.6 | 57.3 (band 7.062499999999999 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 0.16 | 0.7 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 73 |
| Calcium | 0.43 | 2 (band 0.6420454545454545 to 2.5%) | 100 |
| Phosphorus | 0.38 | 1.7 (band 0.5136363636363636 to 1.6%) | 92 |
| Sodium | 0.18 | 0.8 (band 0.1284090909090909+%) | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.1 | 1.1 (band 1 to 2%) | 77.9 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 113 | 513.6 | 100 |
Scored over 8 declared nutrients (combined weight 95); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 78% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 18 nutritional additives on the label
- Iron Proteinate
- Zinc Proteinate
- Manganese Proteinate
- Copper Proteinate
- Magnesium Proteinate
- Sodium Selenite
- Calcium Iodate
- Vitamin E Supplement
- Thiamine Mononitrate
- Niacin Supplement
- Calcium Pantothenate
- Biotin
- Vitamin A Supplement
- Riboflavin Supplement
- Vitamin D3 Supplement
- Vitamin B12 Supplement
- Pyridoxine Hydrochloride
- Folic Acid
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| NO Carrageenan Gum (on pack) | provenance | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Meat is the first ingredient, not water (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| NO Guar Gum (on pack) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Naturally rich in vitamins and minerals (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| NO Xanthan Gum (on pack) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100% nutritionally complete (on pack) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| NO BPA used in can linings (on pack) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Containing polysaccharides which lower bad cholesterol (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Contain powerful phytonutrients which aid in multiple digestive and neurological functions (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100% profits donated (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to 96% Beef & Beef Liver Dog Food
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.