Raw Pets The Simple Food Project Beef & Salmon Recipe
Dry Freeze Dried · complete
Our verdict
Is Raw Pets The Simple Food Project Beef & Salmon Recipe a good dog food?
We score it 73/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids beef: the label lists beef
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists salmon
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (16)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- veg 42.9%
- meat 37.2%
- fibre 5.9%
- mineral 5.1%
- supplement 4.6%
- additive 4.3%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beef | Beef | meat · medium | - | 8.2 |
| 2 | wild-caught salmon | Salmon | meat · good | - | 7.9 |
| 3 | beef liver | Beef Liver | meat · good | - | 7.7 |
| 4 | flaxseed | Linseed | veg · good | - | 7.4 |
| 5 | beef heart | Beef Heart | meat · good | - | 7.1 |
| 6 | organic carrots | Carrots | veg · good | - | 6.9 |
| 7 | organic cranberries | Cranberries | veg · good | - | 6.6 |
| 8 | wild-caught whole ground krill | Krill | meat · good | - | 6.4 |
| 9 | organic green peas | Peas | veg · good | - | 6.1 |
| 10 | ground pumpkin seeds | Pumpkin Seed Meal | fibre · good | - | 5.9 |
| 11 | organic spinach | Spinach | veg · good | - | 5.6 |
| 12 | organic ginger | Ginger | veg · good | - | 5.4 |
| 13 | sea salt | Sea Salt | mineral · medium | - | 5.1 |
| 14 | dried kelp | Kelp | veg · good | - | 4.8 |
| 15 | dried yeast | Yeast | supplement · good | - | 4.6 |
| 16 | mixed tocopherols (natural preservative) | Tocopherols | additive · good | - | 4.3 |
- 1. Beef8.2% estimated
- 2. wild-caught salmon7.9% estimated
- 3. beef liver7.7% estimated
- 4. flaxseed7.4% estimated
- 5. beef heart7.1% estimated
- 6. organic carrots6.9% estimated
- 7. organic cranberries6.6% estimated
- 8. wild-caught whole ground krill6.4% estimated
- 9. organic green peas6.1% estimated
- 10. ground pumpkin seeds5.9% estimated
- 11. organic spinach5.6% estimated
- 12. organic ginger5.4% estimated
- 13. sea salt5.1% estimated
- 14. dried kelp4.8% estimated
- 15. dried yeast4.6% estimated
- 16. mixed tocopherols (natural preservative)4.3% estimated
Nutrition and feeding
Declared analysis (as fed)
No analysis recorded yet.
Energy: 475.1 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
18 2/3 cups per 3 lb box; 369 kcal/cup
Additives declared on the label
Technological additives
mixed tocopherols (natural preservative)
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14
Brand and contact: Raw Pets
- Website
- https://rawpets.com/
- [email protected]
- Phone
- 727-403-4671
- Address
- 8219 Ulmerton Rd, Largo, FL 33771; 4035 Henderson Blvd, Tampa, FL 33629
- Contact page
- rawpets.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-14
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- rawpets.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The overall score is 73 out of 100. Ingredients without printed percentages weighed the score down by -10.6 points. The overall quality of the ingredient list added +8.3 points, the processing format added +6.6 points, and being labelled nutritionally complete added a further +2.3 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.9 | 9.191 | +8.31 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 40.6% | -0.005 | -0.21 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 8.1% | 0.163 | +1.32 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 8.7% | -0.012 | -0.11 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -5.31 | 0.222 | -1.18 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.11 | 33.786 | +37.50 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | yes | 6.629 | +6.63 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.9 | 9.191 | +8.31 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 40.6% | -0.005 | -0.21 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 8.1% | 0.163 | +1.32 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 8.7% | -0.012 | -0.11 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -5.31 | 0.222 | -1.18 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.11 | 33.786 | +37.50 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | yes | 6.629 | +6.63 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.06
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 72.8
- Final score
- 73/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
Analytical constituents not declared
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "Formulated to meet the nutritional levels established by the AAFCO Dog Food Nutrient Profiles for adult maintenance" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
1 further claim on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ethically Sourced Raw Pet Food & Herbs (on page) | provenance | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Formulated to meet the nutritional levels established by the AAFCO Dog Food Nutrient Profiles for adult maintenance (on pack) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to The Simple Food Project Beef & Salmon Recipe
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.