PetPlate Power Packed Pork Entrée
Fresh Chilled · complete
Our verdict
Is PetPlate Power Packed Pork Entrée a good dog food?
We score it 51/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, venison, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists salmon oil
- Your dog avoids pork: the label lists pork
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists barley
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (16)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- veg 34.4%
- meat 16.1%
- supplement 15.6%
- carb 12.8%
- oil 10.7%
- additive 10.5%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pork | Pork | meat · medium | - | 8.2 |
| 2 | pork liver | Pork Liver | meat · good | - | 7.9 |
| 3 | barley | Barley | carb · medium | - | 7.7 |
| 4 | green beans | Green Beans | veg · good | - | 7.4 |
| 5 | carrots | Carrots | veg · good | - | 7.1 |
| 6 | red lentils | Lentils | veg · medium | - | 6.9 |
| 7 | red bell peppers | Red Pepper | veg · good | - | 6.6 |
| 8 | apples | Apples | veg · good | - | 6.4 |
| 9 | vinegar | Vinegar | additive · poor | - | 6.1 |
| 10 | safflower oil | Safflower Oil | oil · good | - | 5.9 |
| 11 | ground flaxseed | Ground Flaxseed (2%) | supplement · good | - | 5.6 |
| 12 | dicalcium phosphate | Dicalcium phosphate | supplement · medium | - | 5.4 |
| 13 | potato starch | Potato starch | carb · poor | - | 5.1 |
| 14 | salmon oil | Salmon Oil | oil · good | - | 4.8 |
| 15 | calcium carbonate | Calcium Carbonate | supplement · medium | - | 4.6 |
| 16 | salt | Salt | additive · poor | - | 4.3 |
- 1. Pork8.2% estimated
- 2. pork liver7.9% estimated
- 3. barley7.7% estimated
- 4. green beans7.4% estimated
- 5. carrots7.1% estimated
- 6. red lentils6.9% estimated
- 7. red bell peppers6.6% estimated
- 8. apples6.4% estimated
- 9. vinegar6.1% estimated
- 10. safflower oil5.9% estimated
- 11. ground flaxseed5.6% estimated
- 12. dicalcium phosphate5.4% estimated
- 13. potato starch5.1% estimated
- 14. salmon oil4.8% estimated
- 15. calcium carbonate4.6% estimated
- 16. salt4.3% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 11% · Fat 6%
Guaranteed analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 11% |
| Fat | 6% |
| Fibre | 0.90% |
| Moisture | 67% |
| Omega-3 fatty acids | 0.30% |
| Omega-6 fatty acids | 2% |
Energy: 141 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 100,000 IU/kg min; Iron (ferrous fumarate); Zinc (zinc oxide); Magnesium (magnesium oxide); Copper (copper gluconate); Manganese (manganese gluconate); Iodine (potassium iodide); Selenium (sodium selenite); Vitamin E supplement; Riboflavin (vitamin B2); Pyridoxine hydrochloride (vitamin B6); Thiamine mononitrate (vitamin B1); Vitamin D3 supplement; Choline bitartrate; Taurine
Technological additives
Mixed tocopherols (a preservative)
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14
Brand and contact: PetPlate
- Website
- https://www.petplate.com/
- Contact page
- www.petplate.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-14
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.petplate.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 3.0/5 · 58 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall rating of 51 out of 100. The inclusion of ingredients without printed percentages contributed -10.6 points to the score. Meanwhile, the overall quality of the ingredient list added +5 points, and the additives in the recipe contributed +2.9 points. Finally, the additive load impacted the rating by -2.8 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.99 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 15.4% | -0.115 | -1.77 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 20.4% | -0.092 | -1.88 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 9.9% | -0.005 | -0.05 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 18.1% | 0.163 | +2.95 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 27.5% | -0.012 | -0.34 |
| Recipe graded poor | 15.6% | -0.065 | -1.01 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 3 | -0.876 | -2.63 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 6.1% | 0.060 | +0.37 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -12.64 | 0.222 | -2.81 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.07 | 33.786 | +36.15 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.99 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 15.4% | -0.115 | -1.77 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 20.4% | -0.092 | -1.88 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 9.9% | -0.005 | -0.05 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 18.1% | 0.163 | +2.95 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 27.5% | -0.012 | -0.34 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 15.6% | -0.065 | -1.01 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 3 | -0.876 | -2.63 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 6.1% | 0.060 | +0.37 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -12.64 | 0.222 | -2.81 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.07 | 33.786 | +36.15 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -1.74
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 51.4
- Final score
- 51/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 11 | 33.3 (band 19.227272727272727 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 6 | 18.2 (band 5.875 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 0.9 | 2.7 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 99.7 |
| Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3) | - | - | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 141 | 427.3 | 100 |
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.
Scored over 5 declared nutrients (combined weight 70); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 15 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A 100,000 IU/kg min
- Iron (ferrous fumarate)
- Zinc (zinc oxide)
- Magnesium (magnesium oxide)
- Copper (copper gluconate)
- Manganese (manganese gluconate)
- Iodine (potassium iodide)
- Selenium (sodium selenite)
- Vitamin E supplement
- Riboflavin (vitamin B2)
- Pyridoxine hydrochloride (vitamin B6)
- Thiamine mononitrate (vitamin B1)
- Vitamin D3 supplement
- Choline bitartrate
- Taurine
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
0/100 · limited — 1 checkable claim: 0 consistent, 1 contradicted.
Contradicted by the label
- "High in fiber" — the declared label says otherwise on high fibre.
5 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supports skin + coat health (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Better than home-cooked (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Made with lean meat (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Grain-inclusive (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100% human-grade (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| High in fiber (on page) | High/low level | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Power Packed Pork Entrée
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.