Our verdict
Is PAWFF Singapore Gently Cooked Chicken a good dog food?
We score it 59/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Single named protein: chicken
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (15)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- supplement 30.7%
- meat 30.4%
- veg 17.4%
- mineral 15.1%
- carb 6.4%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chicken Breast | Chicken Breast | meat · good | - | 8.7 |
| 2 | Chicken Heart | Chicken Heart | meat · good | - | 8.4 |
| 3 | Chicken Thigh | Chicken Thigh | meat · good | - | 8.1 |
| 4 | Copper | Copper | mineral · good | - | 7.8 |
| 5 | Zinc | Zinc Oxide | supplement · good | - | 7.5 |
| 6 | Bone Meal | Bone meal | mineral · medium | - | 7.2 |
| 7 | Kelp Powder | Kelp | veg · good | - | 7.0 |
| 8 | Manganese | Manganese | supplement · good | - | 6.7 |
| 9 | Quinoa Cooked | Quinoa | carb · good | - | 6.4 |
| 10 | Vitamin D | Vitamin D | supplement · good | - | 6.1 |
| 11 | Vitamin E | Vitamin E | supplement · good | - | 5.8 |
| 12 | Sunflower Seed | Sunflower Seeds | veg · good | - | 5.5 |
| 13 | Whole Egg | Egg | meat · good | - | 5.2 |
| 14 | Bok Choy | Bok Choy | veg · good | - | 4.9 |
| 15 | Choline | Choline | supplement · good | - | 4.6 |
- 1. Chicken Breast8.7% estimated
- 2. Chicken Heart8.4% estimated
- 3. Chicken Thigh8.1% estimated
- 4. Copper7.8% estimated
- 5. Zinc7.5% estimated
- 6. Bone Meal7.2% estimated
- 7. Kelp Powder7.0% estimated
- 8. Manganese6.7% estimated
- 9. Quinoa Cooked6.4% estimated
- 10. Vitamin D6.1% estimated
- 11. Vitamin E5.8% estimated
- 12. Sunflower Seed5.5% estimated
- 13. Whole Egg5.2% estimated
- 14. Bok Choy4.9% estimated
- 15. Choline4.6% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 17.26% · Fat 9%
Guaranteed analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 17.26% |
| Fat | 9% |
| Fibre | 3.10% |
| Moisture | 66.15% |
| Carbohydrates | 4.49% |
Energy: 167 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Store frozen and thaw in the refrigerator before feeding. Once thawed, consume within 48 hours.
Feeding guide
Up to 5kg: 100-150g/day; 5-10kg: 150-250g/day; 10-20kg: 250-400g/day; 20kg+: 400g+ per day. Serve at room temperature.
No additives recorded yet.
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-20
Brand and contact: PAWFF Singapore
- Website
- https://www.pawffsg.com/
- Phone
- 96478786
- Address
- Nordcom 2, 2 Gambas Crescent, #02-04, Singapore 757044
- Contact page
- www.pawffsg.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-20
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.pawffsg.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 4.7/5 · 1,596 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The score is 59 out of 100. Undeclared ingredient shares, meaning ingredients without printed percentages, contributed -10.6. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +7.9, and the processing format contributed -2.4. Being labelled nutritionally complete contributed +2.3.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.9 | 9.191 | +7.86 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 8.2% | -0.115 | -0.94 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 17.4% | -0.005 | -0.09 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 41.2% | -0.012 | -0.50 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.9 | 9.191 | +7.86 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 8.2% | -0.115 | -0.94 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 17.4% | -0.005 | -0.09 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 41.2% | -0.012 | -0.50 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -1.74
- Subtotal
- 58.9
- Final score
- 59/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 17.26 | 51 (band 22.200886262924673 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 9 | 26.6 (band 6.7836041358936505 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 3.1 | 9.2 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 167 | 493.4 | 100 |
Fibre: Declared as a maximum; the high-fibre taper is not applied.
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "complete and balanced meal" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
6 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Makes digestion easier—perfect for pets with sensitive stomachs (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Great for those looking for a more natural, wholesome diet (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Keeps all those natural vitamins, minerals, and nutrients intact (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| follows the high standards set by FEDIAF (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| complete and balanced meal (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| no artificial preservatives, colorings, or flavors (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| FEDIAF Gently Cooked meals are made with top-notch, carefully chosen ingredients that are gently cooked to lock in all the natural goodness and flavor (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Gently Cooked Chicken
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.