Ollie Fresh Chicken with Carrots
Fresh Frozen · complete
Our verdict
Is Ollie Fresh Chicken with Carrots a good dog food?
We score it 53/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists salmon oil
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - white
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (22)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- supplement 46.7%
- veg 21.3%
- meat 11.5%
- carb 11.1%
- oil 4.7%
- additive 4.6%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chicken | Chicken | meat · medium | - | 6.0 |
| 2 | Rice | Rice - white | carb · medium | - | 5.8 |
| 3 | Carrots | Carrots | veg · good | - | 5.7 |
| 4 | Chicken Livers | Chicken Liver | meat · good | - | 5.6 |
| 5 | Peas | Peas | veg · good | - | 5.4 |
| 6 | Potatoes | Potatoes | carb · medium | - | 5.3 |
| 7 | Spinach | Spinach | veg · good | - | 5.2 |
| 8 | Cranberries | Cranberries | veg · good | - | 5.0 |
| 9 | Tricalcium Phosphate | Tricalcium phosphate | supplement · good | - | 4.9 |
| 10 | Salmon Oil | Salmon Oil | oil · good | - | 4.7 |
| 11 | Salt | Salt | additive · poor | - | 4.6 |
| 12 | Taurine | Taurine | supplement · good | - | 4.5 |
| 13 | Zinc Gluconate | Zinc Oxide | supplement · good | - | 4.3 |
| 14 | Vitamin E Supplement | Vitamin E | supplement · good | - | 4.2 |
| 15 | Ferrous Sulfate | Iron sulfate | supplement · good | - | 4.1 |
| 16 | Copper Amino Acid Chelate | Copper proteinate | supplement · good | - | 3.9 |
| 17 | Manganese Amino Acid Chelate | Manganese proteinate | supplement · good | - | 3.8 |
| 18 | Vitamin D3 (Cholecalciferol) | Vitamin D | supplement · good | - | 3.7 |
| 19 | Vitamin B2 (Riboflavin) | Vitamin B complex | supplement · good | - | 3.5 |
| 20 | Vitamin B1 (Thiamine Hydrochloride) | Vitamin B complex | supplement · good | - | 3.4 |
| 21 | Vitamin B6 (Pyridoxine Hydrochloride) | Vitamin B complex | supplement · good | - | 3.3 |
| 22 | Potassium Iodide. | Potassium iodide | supplement · good | - | 3.1 |
- 1. Chicken6.0% estimated
- 2. Rice5.8% estimated
- 3. Carrots5.7% estimated
- 4. Chicken Livers5.6% estimated
- 5. Peas5.4% estimated
- 6. Potatoes5.3% estimated
- 7. Spinach5.2% estimated
- 8. Cranberries5.0% estimated
- 9. Tricalcium Phosphate4.9% estimated
- 10. Salmon Oil4.7% estimated
- 11. Salt4.6% estimated
- 12. Taurine4.5% estimated
- 13. Zinc Gluconate4.3% estimated
- 14. Vitamin E Supplement4.2% estimated
- 15. Ferrous Sulfate4.1% estimated
- 16. Copper Amino Acid Chelate3.9% estimated
- 17. Manganese Amino Acid Chelate3.8% estimated
- 18. Vitamin D3 (Cholecalciferol)3.7% estimated
- 19. Vitamin B2 (Riboflavin)3.5% estimated
- 20. Vitamin B1 (Thiamine Hydrochloride)3.4% estimated
- 21. Vitamin B6 (Pyridoxine Hydrochloride)3.3% estimated
- 22. Potassium Iodide.3.1% estimated
Nutrition and feeding
Guaranteed analysis (as fed)
No analysis recorded yet.
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Arrives frozen; store in the freezer; defrost each pack in the fridge for at least 24 hours before serving (ollie.com/how-it-works).
No additives recorded yet.
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-18
Brand and contact: Ollie
- Website
- https://www.ollie.com/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-18
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.ollie.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 4.6/5 · 11,169 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The product scored 53 out of 100. Undeclared ingredient shares reduced the score by -10.6, as the label lists ingredients without printed percentages. The overall quality of the ingredient list added +6.3 points. However, the processing format cost -2.4 points, and the additive load reduced the score by a further -1.2.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.32 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 10.0% | -0.115 | -1.15 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 7.3% | -0.092 | -0.67 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 4.9% | -0.005 | -0.03 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 6.4% | 0.163 | +1.05 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 66.4% | -0.012 | -0.81 |
| Recipe graded poor | 4.6% | -0.065 | -0.30 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.6% | 0.060 | +0.28 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -5.63 | 0.222 | -1.25 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.32 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 10.0% | -0.115 | -1.15 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 7.3% | -0.092 | -0.67 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 4.9% | -0.005 | -0.03 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 6.4% | 0.163 | +1.05 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 66.4% | -0.012 | -0.81 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 4.6% | -0.065 | -0.30 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.6% | 0.060 | +0.28 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -5.63 | 0.222 | -1.25 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -1.74
- Subtotal
- 52.8
- Final score
- 53/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
Analytical constituents not declared
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
No on-pack claims on file: nothing to verify.
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Fresh Chicken with Carrots
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.