Our verdict
Is Nutrish Pet Food Chicken Paw Pie a good dog food?
We score it 52/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Single named protein: chicken
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (17)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 28.5%
- carb 23.8%
- supplement 18.6%
- veg 12.0%
- additive 9.5%
- other 7.7%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Water | Water | other | - | 7.7 |
| 2 | Chicken | Chicken | meat · medium | - | 7.5 |
| 3 | Chicken Broth | Chicken Broth | meat · medium | - | 7.2 |
| 4 | Egg Product | Egg | meat · good | - | 7.0 |
| 5 | Egg Albumin | Egg | meat · good | - | 6.8 |
| 6 | Pea Protein | Pea protein | carb · medium | - | 6.6 |
| 7 | Sweet Potatoes | Sweet Potatoes | carb · good | - | 6.3 |
| 8 | Green Beans | Green Beans | veg · good | - | 6.1 |
| 9 | Pineapple | Pineapple | veg · good | - | 5.9 |
| 10 | Tapioca Starch | Tapioca Starch | carb · medium | - | 5.7 |
| 11 | Dicalcium Phosphate | Dicalcium phosphate | supplement · medium | - | 5.4 |
| 12 | Dextrose | Dextrose | carb · poor | - | 5.2 |
| 13 | Guar Gum | Guar gum | additive · medium | - | 5.0 |
| 14 | Potassium Chloride | Potassium Chloride | supplement · medium | - | 4.8 |
| 15 | Salt | Salt | additive · poor | - | 4.5 |
| 16 | Magnesium Sulfate | Magnesium sulfate | supplement · good | - | 4.3 |
| 17 | Choline Chloride | Choline | supplement · good | - | 4.1 |
- 1. Water7.7% estimated
- 2. Chicken7.5% estimated
- 3. Chicken Broth7.2% estimated
- 4. Egg Product7.0% estimated
- 5. Egg Albumin6.8% estimated
- 6. Pea Protein6.6% estimated
- 7. Sweet Potatoes6.3% estimated
- 8. Green Beans6.1% estimated
- 9. Pineapple5.9% estimated
- 10. Tapioca Starch5.7% estimated
- 11. Dicalcium Phosphate5.4% estimated
- 12. Dextrose5.2% estimated
- 13. Guar Gum5.0% estimated
- 14. Potassium Chloride4.8% estimated
- 15. Salt4.5% estimated
- 16. Magnesium Sulfate4.3% estimated
- 17. Choline Chloride4.1% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 9% · Fat 5%
Guaranteed analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 9% |
| Fat | 5% |
| Fibre | 2% |
| Moisture | 78% |
Energy: 100 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
1 1/3 to 1 1/2 containers (8 oz. Tub) per 10 pounds of body weight daily depending on your dog's activity level. Puppy: up to twice as much food per pound of body weight as adults. When feeding wet with dry, replace 2/3 cup of Rachael Ray Nutrish Real Chicken & Veggies Recipe Dry Kibble with 1 tub (8 oz.) of Chicken Paw Pie.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin E Supplement; L-Ascorbyl-2-Polyphosphate (Source Of Vitamin C); Thiamine Mononitrate; Vitamin A Supplement; Niacin; D-Calcium Pantothenate; Riboflavin Supplement; Vitamin B12 Supplement; Pyridoxine Hydrochloride; Folic Acid; Vitamin D3 Supplement; Biotin; Menadione Sodium Bisulfite (Source Of Vitamin K Activity); Iron Amino Acid Chelate; Zinc Amino Acid Chelate; Manganese Amino Acid Chelate; Calcium Iodate; Sodium Selenite; Copper Amino Acid Chelate
Technological additives
Marine Microalgae Oil (Preserved With Mixed Tocopherols); Guar Gum
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-29
Brand and contact: Nutrish Pet Food
- Website
- https://www.nutrish.com/
- Phone
- 1-800-323-7738
- Address
- Post Consumer Brands / For All Tails Pet Care, ATTN: Consumer Affairs, 20802 Kensington Blvd, Lakeville, MN 55044, United States
- Contact page
- www.nutrish.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-29
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.nutrish.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 0.0/5 · 0 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall score of 52 out of 100 based on several key factors. The presence of ingredients without printed percentages contributed -10.6, while the overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +3.3. Furthermore, the carbohydrate content contributed -3.2, and the additives in the recipe contributed +2.9 to the final score.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.4 | 9.191 | +3.33 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 28.2% | -0.115 | -3.25 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 3.8% | -0.005 | -0.02 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 18.1% | 0.163 | +2.94 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 36.1% | -0.012 | -0.44 |
| Recipe graded poor | 9.7% | -0.065 | -0.63 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 5.2% | 0.060 | +0.31 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -11.49 | 0.222 | -2.55 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.4 | 9.191 | +3.33 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 28.2% | -0.115 | -3.25 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 3.8% | -0.005 | -0.02 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 18.1% | 0.163 | +2.94 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 36.1% | -0.012 | -0.44 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 9.7% | -0.065 | -0.63 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 5.2% | 0.060 | +0.31 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -11.49 | 0.222 | -2.55 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 52.5
- Final score
- 52/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 9 | 40.9 (band 20.454545454545457 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 5 | 22.7 (band 6.250000000000001 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 2 | 9.1 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 100 | 454.5 | 100 |
Fibre: Declared as a maximum; the high-fibre taper is not applied.
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 19 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin E Supplement
- L-Ascorbyl-2-Polyphosphate (Source Of Vitamin C)
- Thiamine Mononitrate
- Vitamin A Supplement
- Niacin
- D-Calcium Pantothenate
- Riboflavin Supplement
- Vitamin B12 Supplement
- Pyridoxine Hydrochloride
- Folic Acid
- Vitamin D3 Supplement
- Biotin
- Menadione Sodium Bisulfite (Source Of Vitamin K Activity)
- Iron Amino Acid Chelate
- Zinc Amino Acid Chelate
- Manganese Amino Acid Chelate
- Calcium Iodate
- Sodium Selenite
- Copper Amino Acid Chelate
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
50/100 · limited — 2 checkable claims: 1 consistent, 1 contradicted.
Contradicted by the label
- "NO POULTRY BY-PRODUCTS" — the declared label says otherwise on chicken.
Consistent with the label
- "NO ADDED GRAIN, CORN OR WHEAT INGREDIENTS" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
6 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Real chicken is a good source of protein that helps support healthy organs and maintain lean muscle mass (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Green Beans are tasty vegetables that provide fiber which help your pet maintain digestive health (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Sweet Potatoes are fiber-rich and help support healthy digestion (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| NO ARTIFICIAL PRESERVATIVES OR ARTIFICIAL FLAVORS (on pack) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| NO POULTRY BY-PRODUCTS (on pack) | Free-from | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
| made with natural ingredients plus essential vitamins and minerals to help support your dog's overall well-being (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| NO ADDED GRAIN, CORN OR WHEAT INGREDIENTS (on pack) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| made with juicy bites of chicken plus sweet potatoes and green beans (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Chicken Paw Pie
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.