Naturesrecipe Grain Free Chicken, Sweet Potato, and Pumpkin Wet
Wet Pate · complete
Our verdict
Is Naturesrecipe Grain Free Chicken, Sweet Potato, and Pumpkin Wet a good dog food?
We score it 53/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists dried ground fish
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (14)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 34.2%
- additive 17.3%
- veg 15.9%
- carb 15.0%
- supplement 11.0%
- oil 6.6%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chicken | Chicken | meat · medium | - | 9.3 |
| 2 | Chicken Broth | Chicken Broth | meat · medium | - | 9.0 |
| 3 | Chicken Liver | Chicken Liver | meat · good | - | 8.6 |
| 4 | Apple | Apples | veg · good | - | 8.3 |
| 5 | Sweet Potato | Sweet Potatoes | carb · good | - | 8.0 |
| 6 | Pumpkin | Pumpkin | veg · good | - | 7.6 |
| 7 | Ground Fish | Dried Ground Fish | meat · medium | - | 7.3 |
| 8 | Pea Protein | Pea protein | carb · medium | - | 7.0 |
| 9 | Canola Oil | Rapeseed oil | oil · good | - | 6.6 |
| 10 | Salt | Salt | additive · poor | - | 6.3 |
| 11 | Potassium Chloride | Potassium Chloride | supplement · medium | - | 6.0 |
| 12 | Guar Gum | Guar gum | additive · medium | - | 5.6 |
| 13 | Carrageenan | Carrageenan | additive · poor | - | 5.3 |
| 14 | Vitamins (L-Ascorbyl-2-Polyphosphate (Source of Vitamin C), Thiamine Mononitrate, Vitamin E Supplement, Nicotinic Acid, D-Calcium Pantothenate, Vitamin A Supplement, Riboflavin Supplement, Vitamin B12 Supplement, Pyridoxine Hydrochloride, Vitamin D3 Supplement, Folic Acid) | Pyridoxine hydrochloride | supplement · good | - | 5.0 |
- 1. Chicken9.3% estimated
- 2. Chicken Broth9.0% estimated
- 3. Chicken Liver8.6% estimated
- 4. Apple8.3% estimated
- 5. Sweet Potato8.0% estimated
- 6. Pumpkin7.6% estimated
- 7. Ground Fish7.3% estimated
- 8. Pea Protein7.0% estimated
- 9. Canola Oil6.6% estimated
- 10. Salt6.3% estimated
- 11. Potassium Chloride6.0% estimated
- 12. Guar Gum5.6% estimated
- 13. Carrageenan5.3% estimated
- 14. Vitamins (L-Ascorbyl-2-Polyphosphate (Source of Vitamin C), Thiamine Mononitrate, Vitamin E Supplement, Nicotinic Acid, D-Calcium Pantothenate, Vitamin A Supplement, Riboflavin Supplement, Vitamin B12 Supplement, Pyridoxine Hydrochloride, Vitamin D3 Supplement, Folic Acid)5.0% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 8% · Fat 5%
Declared analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 8% |
| Fat | 5% |
| Fibre | 1.50% |
| Moisture | 78% |
Energy: 108 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Adult dog under 50 lb: approximately 1 can for every 15 lbs of body weight. Adult dog over 50 lb: approximately 1 can per 20 lbs of body weight.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
L-Ascorbyl-2-Polyphosphate (Source of Vitamin C); Thiamine Mononitrate; Vitamin E Supplement; Nicotinic Acid; D-Calcium Pantothenate; Vitamin A Supplement; Riboflavin Supplement; Vitamin B12 Supplement; Pyridoxine Hydrochloride; Vitamin D3 Supplement; Folic Acid; Zinc Proteinate; Zinc Sulfate; Iron Sulfate; Iron Proteinate; Copper Sulfate; Copper Proteinate; Sodium Selenite; Manganese Sulfate; Manganese Proteinate; Calcium Iodate
Technological additives
Guar Gum; Carrageenan
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-12
Brand and contact: Naturesrecipe
- Phone
- 1-800-237-3856
- Address
- Post Consumer Brands / For All Tails Pet Care, ATTN: Consumer Affairs, 20802 Kensington Blvd, Lakeville, MN 55044, United States
- Contact page
- www.naturesrecipe.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-12
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.naturesrecipe.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall score of 53 out of 100 based on several key factors. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +3.3 points, while the additives in the recipe added +4.6 points. However, ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -10.6 points, and the additive load further adjusted the total by -4.7 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.4 | 9.191 | +3.34 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 14.7% | -0.115 | -1.70 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 11.9% | -0.092 | -1.10 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 4.3% | -0.005 | -0.02 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 28.2% | 0.163 | +4.59 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 18.3% | -0.012 | -0.22 |
| Recipe graded poor | 11.6% | -0.065 | -0.76 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 6.3% | 0.060 | +0.38 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -21.07 | 0.222 | -4.68 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.4 | 9.191 | +3.34 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 14.7% | -0.115 | -1.70 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 11.9% | -0.092 | -1.10 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 4.3% | -0.005 | -0.02 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 28.2% | 0.163 | +4.59 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 18.3% | -0.012 | -0.22 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 11.6% | -0.065 | -0.76 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 6.3% | 0.060 | +0.38 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -21.07 | 0.222 | -4.68 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 52.6
- Final score
- 53/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 8 | 36.4 (band 22.09090909090909 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 5 | 22.7 (band 6.75 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 1.5 | 6.8 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 108 | 490.9 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 78% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 21 nutritional additives on the label
- L-Ascorbyl-2-Polyphosphate (Source of Vitamin C)
- Thiamine Mononitrate
- Vitamin E Supplement
- Nicotinic Acid
- D-Calcium Pantothenate
- Vitamin A Supplement
- Riboflavin Supplement
- Vitamin B12 Supplement
- Pyridoxine Hydrochloride
- Vitamin D3 Supplement
- Folic Acid
- Zinc Proteinate
- Zinc Sulfate
- Iron Sulfate
- Iron Proteinate
- Copper Sulfate
- Copper Proteinate
- Sodium Selenite
- Manganese Sulfate
- Manganese Proteinate
- Calcium Iodate
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
0/100 · limited — 1 checkable claim: 0 consistent, 1 contradicted.
Contradicted by the label
- "no poultry by-product meal" — the declared label says otherwise on chicken.
4 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grain Free (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| no poultry by-product meal (on page) | Free-from | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
| chicken as the 1st ingredient for a high-quality source of protein (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| no artificial preservatives or flavors (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| no added grains, corn, or wheat ingredients (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Grain Free Chicken, Sweet Potato, and Pumpkin Wet
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.