Merrick Pet Care Backcountry Grain Free Real Beef Dinner Wet Dog Food
Wet Chunks · complete
Our verdict
Is Merrick Pet Care Backcountry Grain Free Real Beef Dinner Wet Dog Food a good dog food?
We score it 49/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Single named protein: beef
- Doesn't list chicken, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (11)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- additive 33.2%
- meat 32.6%
- supplement 14.4%
- other 11.2%
- fibre 8.6%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Deboned Beef | Deboned Beef | meat · good | - | 11.8 |
| 2 | Beef Broth | Cooking broth | other · medium | - | 11.2 |
| 3 | Beef Liver | Beef Liver | meat · good | - | 10.7 |
| 4 | Dried Egg Product | Dried Egg | meat · medium | - | 10.2 |
| 5 | Natural Flavor | Flavor | additive · poor | - | 9.6 |
| 6 | Salt | Salt | additive · poor | - | 9.1 |
| 7 | Locust Bean Gum | Carob Flour | fibre · medium | - | 8.6 |
| 8 | Potassium Chloride | Potassium Chloride | supplement · medium | - | 8.0 |
| 9 | Guar Gum | Guar gum | additive · medium | - | 7.5 |
| 10 | Sodium Tripolyphosphate | Sodium Tripolyphosphate | additive · poor | - | 7.0 |
| 11 | Calcium Carbonate | Calcium Carbonate | supplement · medium | - | 6.4 |
- 1. Deboned Beef11.8% estimated
- 2. Beef Broth11.2% estimated
- 3. Beef Liver10.7% estimated
- 4. Dried Egg Product10.2% estimated
- 5. Natural Flavor9.6% estimated
- 6. Salt9.1% estimated
- 7. Locust Bean Gum8.6% estimated
- 8. Potassium Chloride8.0% estimated
- 9. Guar Gum7.5% estimated
- 10. Sodium Tripolyphosphate7.0% estimated
- 11. Calcium Carbonate6.4% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 10% · Fat 6%
Declared analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 10% |
| Fat | 6% |
| Fibre | 1.40% |
| Moisture | 78% |
Energy: 110 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Cover and refrigerate unused portions. Keep fresh water available at all times.
Feeding guide
For dogs over 100 lbs., add 1/4 can for each additional 10 lbs. Adjust feeding level to your dog's individual needs. Cover and refrigerate unused portions. Keep fresh water available at all times. If feeding with dry food, reduce wet amount by 6 oz. for every 1/2 cup of dry food.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin E Supplement; Niacin; Thiamine Mononitrate; Calcium Pantothenate; Pyridoxine Hydrochloride; Vitamin B-12 Supplement; Riboflavin Supplement; Vitamin A Supplement; Folic Acid; Vitamin D-3 Supplement; Biotin; Taurine; Zinc Sulfate; Ferrous Sulfate; Copper Sulfate; Manganese Sulfate; Potassium Iodide; Sodium Selenite
Technological additives
Locust Bean Gum; Guar Gum; Sodium Tripolyphosphate
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-12
Brand and contact: Merrick Pet Care
- Phone
- 1-800-664-7387
- Address
- Office of Consumer Affairs, P.O. Box 340, Neenah, WI 54957
- Contact page
- www.merrickpetcare.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-12
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.merrickpetcare.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 0.0/5 · 0 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The product scored 49 out of 100. Ingredients without printed percentages contributed -10.6 points and the additive load contributed -8.9 points, both reducing the score. The additives in the recipe contributed +7.3 points and being labelled nutritionally complete contributed +2.3 points, both increasing the score.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.1 | 9.191 | +0.61 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 44.5% | 0.163 | +7.25 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 19.8% | -0.012 | -0.24 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.8% | -0.375 | -0.31 |
| Recipe graded poor | 25.7% | -0.065 | -1.67 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 3 | -0.876 | -2.63 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 9.6% | 0.060 | +0.58 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -39.97 | 0.222 | -8.87 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.1 | 9.191 | +0.61 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.005 | +0.00 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 44.5% | 0.163 | +7.25 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 19.8% | -0.012 | -0.24 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.8% | -0.375 | -0.31 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 25.7% | -0.065 | -1.67 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 3 | -0.876 | -2.63 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 9.6% | 0.060 | +0.58 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -39.97 | 0.222 | -8.87 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 49.2
- Final score
- 49/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 10 | 45.5 (band 22.500000000000004 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 6 | 27.3 (band 6.875000000000001 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 1.4 | 6.4 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 110 | 500 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 18 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin E Supplement
- Niacin
- Thiamine Mononitrate
- Calcium Pantothenate
- Pyridoxine Hydrochloride
- Vitamin B-12 Supplement
- Riboflavin Supplement
- Vitamin A Supplement
- Folic Acid
- Vitamin D-3 Supplement
- Biotin
- Taurine
- Zinc Sulfate
- Ferrous Sulfate
- Copper Sulfate
- Manganese Sulfate
- Potassium Iodide
- Sodium Selenite
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) | 5/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "no grain, wheat, corn, or soy" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
8 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| with high protein to maintain lean muscle mass (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| can be served as a complete meal or as a soft topper over kibble (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| no grain, wheat, corn, or soy (on pack) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| grain free and gluten free (on pack) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 96% protein from animal sources (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| pea free and potato free (on pack) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Real deboned beef is the first ingredient (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| supports energy and vitality every day (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| ancestral-inspired diet (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Backcountry Grain Free Real Beef Dinner Wet Dog Food
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.