Our verdict
Is KOHA Pet Pork Entrée a good dog food?
We score it 56/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, venison, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists green-lipped mussel
- Your dog avoids pork: the label lists pork
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (34)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- supplement 64.9%
- veg 14.0%
- additive 6.8%
- meat 3.9%
- other 3.8%
- oil 3.6%
- mineral 2.9%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pork | Pork | meat · medium | - | 3.9 |
| 2 | Water Sufficient for Processing | Water | other | - | 3.8 |
| 3 | Dried Chickpeas | Chickpeas | veg · good | - | 3.8 |
| 4 | Squash | Butternut Squash | veg · good | - | 3.7 |
| 5 | Ground Flaxseed | Ground Flaxseed (2%) | supplement · good | - | 3.7 |
| 6 | Sunflower Oil | Sunflower oil | oil · good | - | 3.6 |
| 7 | Agar Agar | Agar-agar | additive · medium | - | 3.5 |
| 8 | New Zealand Green Mussel | Green-Lipped Mussel | supplement · good | - | 3.5 |
| 9 | Pumpkin | Pumpkin | veg · good | - | 3.4 |
| 10 | Potassium Chloride | Potassium Chloride | supplement · medium | - | 3.4 |
| 11 | Calcium Carbonate | Calcium Carbonate | supplement · medium | - | 3.3 |
| 12 | Salt | Salt | additive · poor | - | 3.3 |
| 13 | Choline Chloride | Choline | supplement · good | - | 3.2 |
| 14 | Blueberries | Blueberries | veg · good | - | 3.1 |
| 15 | Taurine | Taurine | supplement · good | - | 3.1 |
| 16 | Tricalcium Phosphate | Tricalcium phosphate | supplement · good | - | 3.0 |
| 17 | Zinc Proteinate | Zinc Proteinate | supplement · good | - | 3.0 |
| 18 | Iron Proteinate | Iron Proteinate | mineral · good | - | 2.9 |
| 19 | Vitamin E Supplement | Vitamin E | supplement · good | - | 2.9 |
| 20 | Cobalt Proteinate | Cobalt proteinate | supplement · medium | - | 2.8 |
| 21 | Copper Proteinate | Copper proteinate | supplement · good | - | 2.7 |
| 22 | Manganese Proteinate | Manganese proteinate | supplement · good | - | 2.7 |
| 23 | Niacin Supplement | Niacin | supplement · good | - | 2.6 |
| 24 | Sodium Selenite | Sodium selenite | supplement · poor | - | 2.6 |
| 25 | d-Calcium Pantothenate | Calcium pantothenate | supplement · good | - | 2.5 |
| 26 | Thiamine Mononitrate | Thiamine mononitrate | supplement · good | - | 2.5 |
| 27 | Riboflavin Supplement | Riboflavin | supplement · good | - | 2.4 |
| 28 | Vitamin A Supplement | Vitamin A | supplement · good | - | 2.3 |
| 29 | Vitamin B12 Supplement | Vitamin B12 | supplement · good | - | 2.3 |
| 30 | Pyridoxine Hydrochloride | Pyridoxine hydrochloride | supplement · good | - | 2.2 |
| 31 | Biotin | Biotin | supplement · good | - | 2.2 |
| 32 | Potassium Iodide | Potassium iodide | supplement · good | - | 2.1 |
| 33 | Vitamin D3 Supplement | Vitamin D3 supplement | supplement · good | - | 2.1 |
| 34 | Folic Acid | Folic acid | supplement · good | - | 2.0 |
- 1. Pork3.9% estimated
- 2. Water Sufficient for Processing3.8% estimated
- 3. Dried Chickpeas3.8% estimated
- 4. Squash3.7% estimated
- 5. Ground Flaxseed3.7% estimated
- 6. Sunflower Oil3.6% estimated
- 7. Agar Agar3.5% estimated
- 8. New Zealand Green Mussel3.5% estimated
- 9. Pumpkin3.4% estimated
- 10. Potassium Chloride3.4% estimated
- 11. Calcium Carbonate3.3% estimated
- 12. Salt3.3% estimated
- 13. Choline Chloride3.2% estimated
- 14. Blueberries3.1% estimated
- 15. Taurine3.1% estimated
- 16. Tricalcium Phosphate3.0% estimated
- 17. Zinc Proteinate3.0% estimated
- 18. Iron Proteinate2.9% estimated
- 19. Vitamin E Supplement2.9% estimated
- 20. Cobalt Proteinate2.8% estimated
- 21. Copper Proteinate2.7% estimated
- 22. Manganese Proteinate2.7% estimated
- 23. Niacin Supplement2.6% estimated
- 24. Sodium Selenite2.6% estimated
- 25. d-Calcium Pantothenate2.5% estimated
- 26. Thiamine Mononitrate2.5% estimated
- 27. Riboflavin Supplement2.4% estimated
- 28. Vitamin A Supplement2.3% estimated
- 29. Vitamin B12 Supplement2.3% estimated
- 30. Pyridoxine Hydrochloride2.2% estimated
- 31. Biotin2.2% estimated
- 32. Potassium Iodide2.1% estimated
- 33. Vitamin D3 Supplement2.1% estimated
- 34. Folic Acid2.0% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 9.50% · Fat 3%
Declared analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 9.50% |
| Fat | 3% |
| Fibre | 1.50% |
| Moisture | 82% |
Energy: 95.6 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Feed at room temperature and refrigerate unused portion.
Feeding guide
ADULT: Feed 1 1/4 cans per 15 lbs. of body weight per day.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Choline Chloride; Taurine; Zinc Proteinate; Iron Proteinate; Vitamin E Supplement; Cobalt Proteinate; Copper Proteinate; Manganese Proteinate; Niacin Supplement; Sodium Selenite; d-Calcium Pantothenate; Thiamine Mononitrate; Riboflavin Supplement; Vitamin A Supplement; Vitamin B12 Supplement; Pyridoxine Hydrochloride; Biotin; Potassium Iodide; Vitamin D3 Supplement; Folic Acid
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-13
Brand and contact: KOHA Pet
- [email protected]
- Phone
- 1-800-478-7713 x116
- Contact page
- kohapet.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-13
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- kohapet.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 0.0/5 · 0 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The food scored 56 out of 100. Ingredients without printed percentages pulled the score down by -10.6, while the overall quality of the ingredient list lifted it by +6.2. Being labelled nutritionally complete added a further +2.3 points, and the additive load took off -1.8.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.18 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 4.6% | -0.092 | -0.42 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 6.3% | -0.005 | -0.03 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 7.8% | 0.163 | +1.27 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 76.4% | -0.012 | -0.93 |
| Recipe graded poor | 5.8% | -0.065 | -0.38 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 3.3% | 0.060 | +0.20 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -8.22 | 0.222 | -1.82 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.18 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 4.6% | -0.092 | -0.42 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 6.3% | -0.005 | -0.03 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 7.8% | 0.163 | +1.27 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 76.4% | -0.012 | -0.93 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 5.8% | -0.065 | -0.38 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 3.3% | 0.060 | +0.20 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -8.22 | 0.222 | -1.82 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 55.8
- Final score
- 56/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 9.5 | 43.2 (band 19.554545454545455 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 3 | 13.6 (band 5.9750000000000005 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 1.5 | 6.8 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 95.6 | 434.5 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 78% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 20 nutritional additives on the label
- Choline Chloride
- Taurine
- Zinc Proteinate
- Iron Proteinate
- Vitamin E Supplement
- Cobalt Proteinate
- Copper Proteinate
- Manganese Proteinate
- Niacin Supplement
- Sodium Selenite
- d-Calcium Pantothenate
- Thiamine Mononitrate
- Riboflavin Supplement
- Vitamin A Supplement
- Vitamin B12 Supplement
- Pyridoxine Hydrochloride
- Biotin
- Potassium Iodide
- Vitamin D3 Supplement
- Folic Acid
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
33/100 · limited — 3 checkable claims: 1 consistent, 2 contradicted.
Contradicted by the label
- "Single Animal Protein" — the declared label says otherwise on single protein.
- "With only one animal protein per recipe" — the declared label says otherwise on single protein.
Consistent with the label
- "High Protein" — supported by the declared high protein data.
5 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Zealand Green Mussel Promotes Joint Health (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Pumpkin Supports Digestion (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Easy To Digest (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Formulated to meet the nutritional levels established by the AAFCO Dog Food Nutrient Profiles For Maintenance (on pack) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Single Animal Protein (on page) | Content | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
| With only one animal protein per recipe (on page) | Content | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
| High Protein (on page) | High/low level | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| No Junky Fillers or Preservatives (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Pork Entrée
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.