KOHA Pet Limited Ingredient Wet Bland Diet Lamb & White Rice Recipe
Wet Chunks · complete

Our verdict
Is KOHA Pet Limited Ingredient Wet Bland Diet Lamb & White Rice Recipe a good dog food?
We score it 52/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Single named protein: lamb
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - white
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (30)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- supplement 63.7%
- meat 8.6%
- carb 8.1%
- veg 7.7%
- additive 7.7%
- oil 4.1%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lamb | Lamb | meat · medium | - | 4.4 |
| 2 | White Rice | Rice - white | carb · medium | - | 4.3 |
| 3 | Lamb Broth | Lamb Broth | meat · good | - | 4.2 |
| 4 | Pumpkin | Pumpkin | veg · good | - | 4.2 |
| 5 | Sunflower Oil | Sunflower oil | oil · good | - | 4.1 |
| 6 | Guar Gum | Guar gum | additive · medium | - | 4.0 |
| 7 | Tricalcium Phosphate | Tricalcium phosphate | supplement · good | - | 4.0 |
| 8 | Potassium Chloride | Potassium Chloride | supplement · medium | - | 3.9 |
| 9 | Tapioca Starch | Tapioca Starch | carb · medium | - | 3.8 |
| 10 | Choline Chloride | Choline | supplement · good | - | 3.7 |
| 11 | Salt | Salt | additive · poor | - | 3.7 |
| 12 | Magnesium Sulfate | Magnesium sulfate | supplement · good | - | 3.6 |
| 13 | Marine Microalgae Oil | Microalgae | veg · good | - | 3.5 |
| 14 | Thiamine Mononitrate | Thiamine mononitrate | supplement · good | - | 3.4 |
| 15 | Vitamin E Supplement | Vitamin E | supplement · good | - | 3.4 |
| 16 | Niacin | Niacin | supplement · good | - | 3.3 |
| 17 | Ferrous Sulfate | Iron sulfate | supplement · good | - | 3.2 |
| 18 | Zinc Oxide | Zinc Oxide | supplement · good | - | 3.2 |
| 19 | Vitamin A Supplement | Vitamin A | supplement · good | - | 3.1 |
| 20 | Biotin | Biotin | supplement · good | - | 3.0 |
| 21 | Vitamin B12 Supplement | Vitamin B12 | supplement · good | - | 2.9 |
| 22 | Copper Amino Acid Chelate | Copper proteinate | supplement · good | - | 2.9 |
| 23 | Manganous Oxide | Manganese (II) Oxide | supplement · good | - | 2.8 |
| 24 | d-Calcium Pantothenate | Calcium pantothenate | supplement · good | - | 2.7 |
| 25 | Riboflavin | Riboflavin | supplement · good | - | 2.6 |
| 26 | Sodium Selenite | Sodium selenite | supplement · poor | - | 2.6 |
| 27 | Pyridoxine Hydrochloride | Pyridoxine hydrochloride | supplement · good | - | 2.5 |
| 28 | Folic Acid | Folic acid | supplement · good | - | 2.4 |
| 29 | Potassium Iodide | Potassium iodide | supplement · good | - | 2.3 |
| 30 | Vitamin D3 Supplement. | Vitamin D3 supplement | supplement · good | - | 2.3 |
- 1. Lamb4.4% estimated
- 2. White Rice4.3% estimated
- 3. Lamb Broth4.2% estimated
- 4. Pumpkin4.2% estimated
- 5. Sunflower Oil4.1% estimated
- 6. Guar Gum4.0% estimated
- 7. Tricalcium Phosphate4.0% estimated
- 8. Potassium Chloride3.9% estimated
- 9. Tapioca Starch3.8% estimated
- 10. Choline Chloride3.7% estimated
- 11. Salt3.7% estimated
- 12. Magnesium Sulfate3.6% estimated
- 13. Marine Microalgae Oil3.5% estimated
- 14. Thiamine Mononitrate3.4% estimated
- 15. Vitamin E Supplement3.4% estimated
- 16. Niacin3.3% estimated
- 17. Ferrous Sulfate3.2% estimated
- 18. Zinc Oxide3.2% estimated
- 19. Vitamin A Supplement3.1% estimated
- 20. Biotin3.0% estimated
- 21. Vitamin B12 Supplement2.9% estimated
- 22. Copper Amino Acid Chelate2.9% estimated
- 23. Manganous Oxide2.8% estimated
- 24. d-Calcium Pantothenate2.7% estimated
- 25. Riboflavin2.6% estimated
- 26. Sodium Selenite2.6% estimated
- 27. Pyridoxine Hydrochloride2.5% estimated
- 28. Folic Acid2.4% estimated
- 29. Potassium Iodide2.3% estimated
- 30. Vitamin D3 Supplement.2.3% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 7% · Fat 5%
Declared analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 7% |
| Fat | 5% |
| Fibre | 0.50% |
| Moisture | 73% |
Energy: 127 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Refrigerate after opening
Feeding guide
Adult: Feed 1 pouch per 15 lbs. of body weight per day. To use as a mixer: Feed ½ the serving amount of KOHA Bland Diet with ½ the serving amount of current food.
No additives recorded yet.
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-13
Brand and contact: KOHA Pet
- [email protected]
- Phone
- 1-800-478-7713 x116
- Contact page
- kohapet.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-13
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- kohapet.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 0.0/5 · 0 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves a total score of 52 out of 100 based on several key factors. The presence of ingredients without printed percentages contributed -10.6 to the overall rating, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added +6. Furthermore, the additive load contributed -2.1, and the additives in the recipe adjusted the score by +1.4.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 6.0% | -0.115 | -0.69 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 5.1% | -0.092 | -0.47 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 4.8% | -0.005 | -0.02 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 8.7% | 0.163 | +1.41 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 73.5% | -0.012 | -0.90 |
| Recipe graded poor | 6.2% | -0.065 | -0.40 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 3.7% | 0.060 | +0.22 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -9.30 | 0.222 | -2.07 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.00 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 6.0% | -0.115 | -0.69 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 5.1% | -0.092 | -0.47 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 4.8% | -0.005 | -0.02 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 8.7% | 0.163 | +1.41 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 73.5% | -0.012 | -0.90 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 6.2% | -0.065 | -0.40 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 3.7% | 0.060 | +0.22 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -9.30 | 0.222 | -2.07 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Subtotal
- 51.6
- Final score
- 52/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 7 | 25.9 (band 21.166666666666664 to 40%) | 85.2 |
| Fat | 5 | 18.5 (band 6.467592592592592 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 0.5 | 1.9 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 88 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 127 | 470.4 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "Single Protein Recipe" — supported by the declared single protein data.
8 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ideal for dogs struggling with loose stool, diarrhea and upset stomach (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Gently Formulated (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Supports Healthy Stools (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Soft for Senior Dogs (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| One protein source for easy digestion (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Single Protein Recipe (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Cooked and Ready to Serve (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Free from junky fillers like peas, potatoes, corn, soy or artificial preservatives (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Fiber from Pumpkin and White Rice (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Limited Ingredient Wet Bland Diet Lamb & White Rice Recipe
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.




