NutriCare Spay & Neuter Large & Medium Adult Dog Food
Dry Extruded · complete
Our verdict
Is NutriCare Spay & Neuter Large & Medium Adult Dog Food a good dog food?
We score it 43/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Labelling or feeding guide is aimed at medium dogs
- Single named protein: chicken
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - white
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (16)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- fibre 27.3%
- supplement 24.5%
- additive 18.4%
- meat 8.2%
- carb 7.9%
- oil 7.1%
- veg 6.6%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chicken Meal | Dried chicken protein | meat · good | - | 8.2 |
| 2 | Brewers Rice | Rice - white | carb · medium | - | 7.9 |
| 3 | Powdered Cellulose | Powdered Cellulose | fibre · poor | - | 7.7 |
| 4 | Pea Fiber | Pea Fibre | fibre · medium | - | 7.4 |
| 5 | Chicken Fat | Chicken Oil and Fat | oil · good | - | 7.1 |
| 6 | Natural Flavor | Flavor | additive · poor | - | 6.9 |
| 7 | Whole Flaxseeds | Linseed | veg · good | - | 6.6 |
| 8 | Dried Plain Beet Pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre · medium | - | 6.4 |
| 9 | Salt | Salt | additive · poor | - | 6.1 |
| 10 | Psyllium Seed Husk | Psyllium | fibre · good | - | 5.9 |
| 11 | Fructooligosaccharide | Fructo-oligosaccharides | supplement · good | - | 5.6 |
| 12 | Sodium Bentonite | Bentonite And Bentonite Montmorillonite | additive · medium | - | 5.4 |
| 13 | Potassium Chloride | Potassium Chloride | supplement · medium | - | 5.1 |
| 14 | Choline Chloride | Choline | supplement · good | - | 4.8 |
| 15 | DL-Methionine | Methionine | supplement · good | - | 4.6 |
| 16 | Sodium bisulfate | Menadione sodium bisulfite complex | supplement · poor | - | 4.3 |
- 1. Chicken Meal8.2% estimated
- 2. Brewers Rice7.9% estimated
- 3. Powdered Cellulose7.7% estimated
- 4. Pea Fiber7.4% estimated
- 5. Chicken Fat7.1% estimated
- 6. Natural Flavor6.9% estimated
- 7. Whole Flaxseeds6.6% estimated
- 8. Dried Plain Beet Pulp6.4% estimated
- 9. Salt6.1% estimated
- 10. Psyllium Seed Husk5.9% estimated
- 11. Fructooligosaccharide5.6% estimated
- 12. Sodium Bentonite5.4% estimated
- 13. Potassium Chloride5.1% estimated
- 14. Choline Chloride4.8% estimated
- 15. DL-Methionine4.6% estimated
- 16. Sodium bisulfate4.3% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 32% · Fat 12%
Guaranteed analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 32% |
| Fat | 12% |
| Fibre | 17.50% |
| Moisture | 10% |
| Carbohydrates | 28% |
| Omega-3 fatty acids | 0.60% |
| Omega-6 fatty acids | 2.30% |
Energy: 329 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Body Weight (lb): Ideal / Above Ideal / Overweight (cups). 25 lb: 2 / 1¾ / 1⅝; 50 lb: 3¼ / 2⅞ / 2⅝; 100 lb: 5⅛ / 4⅝ / 4; 150 lb: 6⅝ / 6 / 5⅓; 170 lb: 7¼ / 6½ / 5¾
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin E supplement, Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C), Niacin Supplement, Calcium pantothenate, Vitamin A Supplement, Riboflavin Supplement, Vitamin B12 Supplement, Pyridoxine Hydrochloride, Thiamine mononitrate, Biotin, Vitamin D3 Supplement, Folic Acid; Iron Sulfate, Zinc Oxide, Zinc Proteinate, Selenium Yeast, Iron Proteinate, Manganous Oxide, Copper Sulfate, Manganese Proteinate, Copper Proteinate, Potassium Iodide, Calcium Carbonate; Taurine; Choline Chloride; DL-Methionine; L-Carnitine
Technological additives
Tocopherols (preservative); Rosemary Extract (natural flavor/antioxidant); Green Tea Extract (natural flavor/antioxidant); Spearmint Extract (natural flavor/antioxidant); Sodium Bentonite
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-29
Brand and contact: NutriCare
- Website
- https://ivet.com/
- Phone
- 1.800.436.5909
- Address
- iVet by Virbac, 6300 Kelly Drive, Parkville, MO 64152
- Contact page
- ivet.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-29
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- ivet.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 4.6/5 · 37 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This food achieves an overall score of 43 out of 100 based on several key factors. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +3.3 points. However, ingredients without printed percentages contributed -10.6 points, the processing format contributed -6.7 points, and the additive load contributed -4.9 points to the final calculation.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.4 | 9.191 | +3.34 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 7.6% | -0.115 | -0.88 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 7.8% | -0.092 | -0.71 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 6.5% | -0.005 | -0.03 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 18.1% | 0.163 | +2.95 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 24.7% | -0.012 | -0.30 |
| Recipe graded poor | 25.0% | -0.065 | -1.62 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 4 | -0.876 | -3.50 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 7.7% | 0.060 | +0.46 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -22.16 | 0.222 | -4.92 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.4 | 9.191 | +3.34 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 7.6% | -0.115 | -0.88 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 7.8% | -0.092 | -0.71 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 6.5% | -0.005 | -0.03 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 18.1% | 0.163 | +2.95 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 24.7% | -0.012 | -0.30 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 25.0% | -0.065 | -1.62 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 4 | -0.876 | -3.50 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 7.7% | 0.060 | +0.46 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -22.16 | 0.222 | -4.92 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 42.7
- Final score
- 43/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 32 | 35.4 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 12 | 13.3 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 17.5 | 19.3 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3) | - | - | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 329 | 363.5 | 100 |
Fibre: Declared as a maximum; the high-fibre taper is not applied.
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.
Scored over 5 declared nutrients (combined weight 70); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 6 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin E supplement, Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C), Niacin Supplement, Calcium pantothenate, Vitamin A Supplement, Riboflavin Supplement, Vitamin B12 Supplement, Pyridoxine Hydrochloride, Thiamine mononitrate, Biotin, Vitamin D3 Supplement, Folic Acid
- Iron Sulfate, Zinc Oxide, Zinc Proteinate, Selenium Yeast, Iron Proteinate, Manganous Oxide, Copper Sulfate, Manganese Proteinate, Copper Proteinate, Potassium Iodide, Calcium Carbonate
- Taurine
- Choline Chloride
- DL-Methionine
- L-Carnitine
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 2 checkable claims: 2 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "complete food for adult dogs (>12 months)" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
- "high protein (32% protein content)" — supported by the declared high protein data.
7 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| supports healthy digestion (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| supports lean muscle development (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| supports weight and appetite control (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| balance of omega-6 & omega-3 fatty acids to nourish healthy skin and shiny coat (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Ascophyllum nodosum (Dried Seaweed Meal) helps reduce plaque and aids in overall dental health (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| complete food for adult dogs (>12 months) (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| All formulas meet or exceed AAFCO nutrient profiles for their intended life stage and species (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| high protein (32% protein content) (on page) | High/low level | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| 86% animal-sourced protein (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Spay & Neuter Large & Medium Adult Dog Food
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.