Our verdict
Is NutriCare Canine Digestive Support a good dog food?
We score it 40/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists dried chicken protein
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists fish meal
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - white
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (16)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- carb 29.3%
- meat 21.2%
- fibre 17.6%
- supplement 14.8%
- additive 9.9%
- oil 7.1%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brewers Rice | Rice - white | carb · medium | - | 8.2 |
| 2 | Whole Grain Corn | Whole-Grain Maize | carb · medium | - | 7.9 |
| 3 | Fish Meal | Fish Meal | meat · medium | - | 7.7 |
| 4 | Corn Gluten Meal | Maize gluten | carb · poor | - | 7.4 |
| 5 | Chicken Fat (preserved with mixed tocopherols) | Chicken Oil and Fat | oil · good | - | 7.1 |
| 6 | Dried Egg Product | Dried Egg | meat · medium | - | 6.9 |
| 7 | Chicken Meal | Dried chicken protein | meat · good | - | 6.6 |
| 8 | Dried Plain Beet Pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre · medium | - | 6.4 |
| 9 | Hemicellulose Extract | Hemicellulose Extract | fibre · medium | - | 6.1 |
| 10 | Dextrose | Dextrose | carb · poor | - | 5.9 |
| 11 | Dicalcium Phosphate | Dicalcium phosphate | supplement · medium | - | 5.6 |
| 12 | Natural Flavours | Artificial flavourings | additive · poor | - | 5.4 |
| 13 | Psyllium Husks | Psyllium | fibre · good | - | 5.1 |
| 14 | Potassium Chloride | Potassium Chloride | supplement · medium | - | 4.8 |
| 15 | Salt | Salt | additive · poor | - | 4.6 |
| 16 | Brewers Yeast | Brewer's Yeast | supplement · good | - | 4.3 |
- 1. Brewers Rice8.2% estimated
- 2. Whole Grain Corn7.9% estimated
- 3. Fish Meal7.7% estimated
- 4. Corn Gluten Meal7.4% estimated
- 5. Chicken Fat (preserved with mixed tocopherols)7.1% estimated
- 6. Dried Egg Product6.9% estimated
- 7. Chicken Meal6.6% estimated
- 8. Dried Plain Beet Pulp6.4% estimated
- 9. Hemicellulose Extract6.1% estimated
- 10. Dextrose5.9% estimated
- 11. Dicalcium Phosphate5.6% estimated
- 12. Natural Flavours5.4% estimated
- 13. Psyllium Husks5.1% estimated
- 14. Potassium Chloride4.8% estimated
- 15. Salt4.6% estimated
- 16. Brewers Yeast4.3% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 22% · Fat 11%
Guaranteed analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed | Dry matter | Directory average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 22% | 23.50% | - |
| Fat | 11% | 12.50% | - |
| Fibre | 3% | 1.50% | - |
| Ash | 7.30% | 6.70% | - |
| Carbohydrates | 51.70% | 47.30% | - |
| Calcium | 0.60% | - | - |
| Phosphorus | 0.50% | - | - |
| Sodium | 0.38% | - | - |
Energy: 354 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Daily feeding amounts based on body weight (5-100 lbs) with three calorie levels (Very Thin/Underweight, Ideal Weight, Obese). Based on standard 8 oz. fluid measuring cup.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin E Supplement; L-Ascorbyl-2-Polyphosphate (source of Vitamin C); Niacin; Calcium Pantothenate; Vitamin A Supplement; Thiamine Mononitrate; Pyridoxine Hydrochloride; Riboflavin; Vitamin D3 Supplement; Biotin; Vitamin B12 Supplement; Folic Acid; Zinc Sulfate; Ferrous Sulfate; Copper Sulfate; Manganous Oxide; Sodium Selenite; Calcium Iodate
Technological additives
mixed tocopherols; Citric Acid
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-29
Brand and contact: NutriCare
- Website
- https://ivet.com/
- Phone
- 1.800.436.5909
- Address
- iVet by Virbac, 6300 Kelly Drive, Parkville, MO 64152
- Contact page
- ivet.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-29
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- ivet.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 4.6/5 · 37 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall score of 40 out of 100. Ingredients without printed percentages adjust the rating by -10.6. Furthermore, the processing format contributes -6.7 to the overall score. The carbohydrate content also adjusts the total by -3.3. Finally, the additive load influences the result by -2.7.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.2 | 9.191 | +2.17 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 28.6% | -0.115 | -3.29 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 7.8% | -0.092 | -0.72 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 9.8% | 0.163 | +1.60 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 15.0% | -0.012 | -0.18 |
| Recipe graded poor | 23.2% | -0.065 | -1.51 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 4 | -0.876 | -3.50 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 7.4% | 0.060 | +0.44 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -12.25 | 0.222 | -2.72 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.2 | 9.191 | +2.17 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 28.6% | -0.115 | -3.29 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 7.8% | -0.092 | -0.72 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.005 | +0.00 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 9.8% | 0.163 | +1.60 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 15.0% | -0.012 | -0.18 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 23.2% | -0.065 | -1.51 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 4 | -0.876 | -3.50 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 7.4% | 0.060 | +0.44 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -12.25 | 0.222 | -2.72 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 40.2
- Final score
- 40/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 22 | 24.3 (band 18 to 40%) | 87.2 |
| Fat | 11 | 12.2 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 97.5 |
| Fibre | 3 | 3.3 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Calcium | 0.6 | 0.7 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 74.9 |
| Phosphorus | 0.5 | 0.6 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 77.6 |
| Sodium | 0.38 | 0.4 (band 0.1+%) | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.2 | 1.2 (band 1 to 2%) | 82 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 354 | 391.2 | 100 |
Scored over 8 declared nutrients (combined weight 95); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 18 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin E Supplement
- L-Ascorbyl-2-Polyphosphate (source of Vitamin C)
- Niacin
- Calcium Pantothenate
- Vitamin A Supplement
- Thiamine Mononitrate
- Pyridoxine Hydrochloride
- Riboflavin
- Vitamin D3 Supplement
- Biotin
- Vitamin B12 Supplement
- Folic Acid
- Zinc Sulfate
- Ferrous Sulfate
- Copper Sulfate
- Manganous Oxide
- Sodium Selenite
- Calcium Iodate
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| high digestibility formula (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| promotes improved digestion (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| robust immune support (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| improves nutrient absorption, minimizing digestive discomfort (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| immune and intestinal support (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| balanced diet (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Protein, fat, and fiber contribute to building a healthier physique and a more energetic canine (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| key minerals like Calcium and Phosphorus boost bone health (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Sodium and Potassium regulate your dog's fluid balance (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Canine Digestive Support
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.