TFP Nutrition Adult Dog Food Formula
Dry Extruded · complete
Our verdict
Is TFP Nutrition Adult Dog Food Formula a good dog food?
We score it 39/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists wheat
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (28)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- supplement 68.8%
- carb 13.8%
- additive 8.5%
- mineral 4.5%
- oil 4.4%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wheat middlings | Wheat | carb · poor | - | 4.7 |
| 2 | ground yellow corn | Maize / Corn | carb · medium | - | 4.6 |
| 3 | meat and bone meal | Bone meal | mineral · medium | - | 4.5 |
| 4 | soybean meal | Soybean Meal | carb · poor | - | 4.5 |
| 5 | animal fat | Unspecified Animal Fats and Oils | oil · poor | - | 4.4 |
| 6 | natural flavor | Flavor | additive · poor | - | 4.3 |
| 7 | salt | Salt | additive · poor | - | 4.2 |
| 8 | potassium chloride | Potassium Chloride | supplement · medium | - | 4.1 |
| 9 | vitamin A supplement | Vitamin A | supplement · good | - | 4.0 |
| 10 | vitamin D3 supplement | Vitamin D3 supplement | supplement · good | - | 3.9 |
| 11 | vitamin E supplement | Vitamin E | supplement · good | - | 3.9 |
| 12 | vitamin B12 supplement | Vitamin B12 | supplement · good | - | 3.8 |
| 13 | riboflavin supplement | Riboflavin | supplement · good | - | 3.7 |
| 14 | dl-methionine | Methionine | supplement · good | - | 3.6 |
| 15 | niacin | Niacin | supplement · good | - | 3.5 |
| 16 | calcium pantothenate | Calcium pantothenate | supplement · good | - | 3.4 |
| 17 | choline chloride | Choline | supplement · good | - | 3.4 |
| 18 | menadione sodium bisulfite complex (source of vitamin K activity) | Menadione sodium bisulfite complex | supplement · poor | - | 3.3 |
| 19 | folic acid | Folic acid | supplement · good | - | 3.2 |
| 20 | biotin | Biotin | supplement · good | - | 3.1 |
| 21 | thiamine mononitrate | Thiamine mononitrate | supplement · good | - | 3.0 |
| 22 | pyridoxine hydrochloride | Pyridoxine hydrochloride | supplement · good | - | 2.9 |
| 23 | sodium selenite | Sodium selenite | supplement · poor | - | 2.9 |
| 24 | calcium iodate | Calcium iodate | supplement · medium | - | 2.8 |
| 25 | ferrous sulfate | Iron sulfate | supplement · good | - | 2.7 |
| 26 | manganese sulfate | Manganese sulfate | supplement · medium | - | 2.6 |
| 27 | zinc sulfate | Zinc sulfate | supplement · medium | - | 2.5 |
| 28 | copper sulfate. | Copper sulphate | supplement · good | - | 2.4 |
- 1. Wheat middlings4.7% estimated
- 2. ground yellow corn4.6% estimated
- 3. meat and bone meal4.5% estimated
- 4. soybean meal4.5% estimated
- 5. animal fat4.4% estimated
- 6. natural flavor4.3% estimated
- 7. salt4.2% estimated
- 8. potassium chloride4.1% estimated
- 9. vitamin A supplement4.0% estimated
- 10. vitamin D3 supplement3.9% estimated
- 11. vitamin E supplement3.9% estimated
- 12. vitamin B12 supplement3.8% estimated
- 13. riboflavin supplement3.7% estimated
- 14. dl-methionine3.6% estimated
- 15. niacin3.5% estimated
- 16. calcium pantothenate3.4% estimated
- 17. choline chloride3.4% estimated
- 18. menadione sodium bisulfite complex (source of vitamin K activity)3.3% estimated
- 19. folic acid3.2% estimated
- 20. biotin3.1% estimated
- 21. thiamine mononitrate3.0% estimated
- 22. pyridoxine hydrochloride2.9% estimated
- 23. sodium selenite2.9% estimated
- 24. calcium iodate2.8% estimated
- 25. ferrous sulfate2.7% estimated
- 26. manganese sulfate2.6% estimated
- 27. zinc sulfate2.5% estimated
- 28. copper sulfate.2.4% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 18% · Fat 6%
Declared analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 18% |
| Fat | 6% |
| Fibre | 6% |
| Moisture | 12% |
Energy: 307.9 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Up to 12 lb: 1/2 - 1 1/2 cups; 13 - 25 lb: 1 1/2 - 2 1/2 cups; 26 - 50 lb: 2 1/2 - 4 3/4 cups; 51 - 100 lb: 4 3/4 - 6 1/4 cups; 100+ lb: 6 1/4 cups + 1/2 cup for every 10 lb over 100 lb. Serving size based on a standard 8-ounce measuring cup.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A supplement; Vitamin D3 supplement; Vitamin E supplement; Vitamin B12 supplement; Riboflavin supplement; Niacin; Calcium pantothenate; Choline chloride; Menadione sodium bisulfite complex (source of vitamin K activity); Folic acid; Biotin; Thiamine mononitrate; Pyridoxine hydrochloride; Sodium selenite; Calcium iodate; Ferrous sulfate; Manganese sulfate; Zinc sulfate; Copper sulfate
Technological additives
BHA (preservative in animal fat)
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-18
Brand and contact: TFP Nutrition
- Phone
- 936-564-3711
- Contact page
- www.tfpnutrition.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-18
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.tfpnutrition.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 4.9/5 · 528 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall rating of 39 out of 100. The inclusion of ingredients without printed percentages contributed -10.6 points, and the processing format adjusted the score by -6.7. Conversely, the overall quality of the ingredient list added +2.8 points, while being labelled nutritionally complete contributed +2.3 points to the final evaluation.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.3 | 9.191 | +2.82 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 13.3% | -0.115 | -1.53 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 4.7% | -0.092 | -0.43 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 8.3% | 0.163 | +1.36 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 69.0% | -0.012 | -0.84 |
| Recipe graded poor | 28.2% | -0.065 | -1.83 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 7 | -0.876 | -6.13 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.7% | 0.060 | +0.28 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -10.40 | 0.222 | -2.31 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.3 | 9.191 | +2.82 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 13.3% | -0.115 | -1.53 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 4.7% | -0.092 | -0.43 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.005 | +0.00 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 8.3% | 0.163 | +1.36 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 69.0% | -0.012 | -0.84 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 28.2% | -0.065 | -1.83 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 7 | -0.876 | -6.13 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.7% | 0.060 | +0.28 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -10.40 | 0.222 | -2.31 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 39.3
- Final score
- 39/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 18 | 19.9 (band 18 to 40%) | 75.2 |
| Fat | 6 | 6.6 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 74.7 |
| Fibre | 6 | 6.6 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 307.9 | 340.2 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 19 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A supplement
- Vitamin D3 supplement
- Vitamin E supplement
- Vitamin B12 supplement
- Riboflavin supplement
- Niacin
- Calcium pantothenate
- Choline chloride
- Menadione sodium bisulfite complex (source of vitamin K activity)
- Folic acid
- Biotin
- Thiamine mononitrate
- Pyridoxine hydrochloride
- Sodium selenite
- Calcium iodate
- Ferrous sulfate
- Manganese sulfate
- Zinc sulfate
- Copper sulfate
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complete and balanced nutrition (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Everyday nutrition for adult dogs (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Formulated to meet the nutritional levels established by the AAFCO Dog food Nutrient Profiles for maintenance (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Essential vitamins and minerals (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Adult Dog Food Formula
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.