Hill's Pet Nutrition Mature Adult Healthy Cuisine Chicken & Vegetables Stew
Wet Chunks complete
Is Hill's Pet Nutrition Mature Adult Healthy Cuisine Chicken & Vegetables Stew a good dog food?
We score it 51/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Why this score?
This recipe achieves a total score of 51 out of 100 based on several key factors. The overall quality of the ingredient list adds +3.8 points, and being labelled nutritionally complete contributes an additional +2.3 points. However, ingredients without printed percentages deduct -10.6 points, and the carbohydrate content further reduces the score by -2.1 points.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
- Recipe51
- Nutritionallow83
- Transparency50
- Safety100
- EvidenceNot recorded
The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.
Why you might choose it
- Declares energy content, which most labels omit.
- Nutritionally complete: formulated to be fed as the whole diet.
Why you might not
- Only protein, fat and fibre declared; ash and moisture missing from the analysis.
- 100% of the recipe mass has no printed percentage, so the exact split cannot be verified.
- Its additive load costs about 2 points in the rating.
Estimated composition
Typical analysis (as fed)
- Protein
- 23.10%
- Fat
- 14.90%
- Fibre
- 4.60%
- Carbohydrates
- 50.50%
- Omega-3 fatty acids
- 0.38%
- Omega-6 fatty acids
- 3.10%
- Calcium
- 0.96%
- Phosphorus
- 0.64%
- Sodium
- 0.37%
Energy: 70.7 kcal/100g
Dry matter basis
- Protein
- 23.10%
- Fat
- 14.90%
- Fibre
- 4.60%
- Carbohydrates
- 50.50%
Additives & feeding info
Nutritional additives
Vitamin E Supplement; L-Ascorbyl-2-Polyphosphate (source of Vitamin C); Thiamine Mononitrate; Niacin Supplement; Calcium Pantothenate; Vitamin B12 Supplement; Pyridoxine Hydrochloride; Biotin; Riboflavin Supplement; Vitamin D3 Supplement; Folic Acid; Ferrous Sulfate; Zinc Oxide; Copper Sulfate; Manganese Sulfate; Manganous Oxide; Calcium Iodate; Sodium Selenite
Feeding guide
Adjust feeding amounts as necessary to maintain optimal weight. For dogs 5 lbs feed 3 pouches, 10 lbs 5.5 pouches, 20 lbs 9 pouches, 30 lbs 12 pouches, 40 lbs 15 pouches, 50 lbs 18 pouches, 60 lbs 20.5 pouches, 80 lbs 25.5 pouches, 100 lbs 30 pouches, 120 lbs 34.5 pouches (2.8 oz pouches).
Reviews
Trustpilot: 3.0/5 · 3 reviews
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for senior dogs
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
- Your dog avoids pork: the label lists pork liver
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - white
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (23)
| # | As declared | Matched | Category | Tier | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chicken Broth | Cooking broth | other | medium | - | 5.7 |
| 2 | Chicken | Chicken | meat | medium | - | 5.6 |
| 3 | Carrots | Carrots | veg | good | - | 5.5 |
| 4 | Pork Liver | Pork Liver | meat | good | - | 5.3 |
| 5 | Rice | Rice - white | carb | medium | - | 5.2 |
| 6 | Green Peas | Peas | veg | medium | - | 5.1 |
| 7 | Rice Starch | Rice - white | carb | medium | - | 5.0 |
| 8 | Spinach | Spinach | veg | good | - | 4.8 |
| 9 | Dried Beet Pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre | medium | - | 4.7 |
| 10 | Powdered Cellulose | Powdered Cellulose | fibre | poor | - | 4.6 |
| 11 | Hydrolyzed Chicken Flavor | Chicken | meat | medium | - | 4.5 |
| 12 | Chicken Liver Flavor | Liver | meat | good | - | 4.3 |
| 13 | Potassium Alginate | Alginate | additive | medium | - | 4.2 |
| 14 | Soybean Oil | Soybean oil | oil | medium | - | 4.1 |
| 15 | Chicken Fat | Chicken Oil and Fat | oil | medium | - | 4.0 |
| 16 | Calcium Chloride | Calcium Carbonate | supplement | medium | - | 3.9 |
| 17 | Guar Gum | Guar gum | additive | medium | - | 3.7 |
| 18 | Dicalcium Phosphate | Dicalcium phosphate | supplement | medium | - | 3.6 |
| 19 | Wheat Gluten | Wheat Gluten | carb | poor | - | 3.5 |
| 20 | Monosodium Phosphate | Sodium phosphate | additive | poor | - | 3.4 |
| 21 | Calcium Lactate | Calcium Carbonate | supplement | medium | - | 3.2 |
| 22 | Calcium Gluconate | Calcium Carbonate | supplement | medium | - | 3.1 |
| 23 | Choline Chloride | Choline | supplement | good | - | 3.0 |
Brand
- Website
- https://www.hillspet.com/
- Contact page
- www.hillspet.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-18
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.hillspet.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Scored with model v3 on 2026-09-26. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.4 | 9.191 | +3.79 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 18.5% | -0.115 | -2.12 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 12.3% | -0.092 | -1.13 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 3.5% | -0.005 | -0.02 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 11.0% | 0.163 | +1.79 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 23.7% | -0.012 | -0.29 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.4% | -0.375 | -0.16 |
| Recipe graded poor | 8.1% | -0.065 | -0.52 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.6% | 0.060 | +0.28 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -9.54 | 0.222 | -2.12 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.4 | 9.191 | +3.79 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 18.5% | -0.115 | -2.12 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 12.3% | -0.092 | -1.13 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 3.5% | -0.005 | -0.02 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 11.0% | 0.163 | +1.79 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 23.7% | -0.012 | -0.29 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.4% | -0.375 | -0.16 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 8.1% | -0.065 | -0.52 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.6% | 0.060 | +0.28 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -9.54 | 0.222 | -2.12 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 51.3
- Final score
- 51/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 23.1 | 110 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 14.9 | 71 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 4.6 | 21.9 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Calcium | 0.96 | 4.6 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 17.1 |
| Phosphorus | 0.64 | 3 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 9.5 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.5 | 1.5 (band 1 to 2%) | 100 |
| Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3) | - | - | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 70.7 | 336.7 | 100 |
Fibre: Declared as a maximum; the high-fibre taper is not applied.
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.
Scored over 8 declared nutrients (combined weight 100); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 79% from the food type.
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Made in the USA with global ingredients you can trust (on pack) | provenance | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Recommended for Adult dogs 7+ years of age (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| U.S. Veterinarians’ #1 Recommended Brand (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| High-quality protein for lean muscles (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Easy to digest (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Balanced minerals for heart & kidney health (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Formulated with Key nutrients to support your pet’s stage of life (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Complete and balanced nutrition for maintenance of adult dogs (on pack) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Delicious roasted chicken paired with tender vegetables in a succulent stew (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Other products from Hill's Pet Nutrition
See all products from Hill's Pet Nutrition
Alternatives to Mature Adult Healthy Cuisine Chicken & Vegetables Stew
Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.
Community
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.