Hill's Pet Nutrition Derm Complete Rice & Egg Recipe Wet Dog Food
Wet Pate complete
Is Hill's Pet Nutrition Derm Complete Rice & Egg Recipe Wet Dog Food a good dog food?
We score it 53/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Why this score?
This recipe achieves a rating of 53 out of 100 overall. The inclusion of ingredients without printed percentages contributed -10.6 points, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added +5.1 points. Additionally, the carbohydrate content contributed -2.4 points, and being labelled nutritionally complete added +2.3 points.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
- Recipe53
- Nutritionallow90
- Transparency50
- Safety100
- Evidencelimited0
The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.
Why you might choose it
- Declares energy content, which most labels omit.
- Nutritionally complete: formulated to be fed as the whole diet.
Why you might not
- Meat makes up an estimated 9% of the dry matter (12% as fed); carbohydrates dominate.
- Only protein, fat and fibre declared; ash and moisture missing from the analysis.
- 100% of the recipe mass has no printed percentage, so the exact split cannot be verified.
Estimated composition
Typical analysis (as fed)
- Protein
- 20%
- Fat
- 16.80%
- Fibre
- 1.30%
- Carbohydrates
- 56.70%
- Omega-3 fatty acids
- 1.88%
- Omega-6 fatty acids
- 3.76%
- Calcium
- 0.80%
- Phosphorus
- 0.55%
- Sodium
- 0.36%
Energy: 121 kcal/100g
Dry matter basis
- Protein
- 20%
- Fat
- 16.80%
- Fibre
- 1.30%
- Carbohydrates
- 56.70%
Additives & feeding info
Technological additives
Mixed Tocopherols for freshness
Storage
Cover and refrigerate unused portion.
Feeding guide
Adult maintenance: 5 lb (2.3 kg) = 1/2 can; 10 lb (4.5 kg) = 3/4 can; 15 lb (6.8 kg) = 1 can; 20 lb (9.1 kg) = 1 1/3 cans; 30 lb (14 kg) = 1 3/4 cans; 40 lb (18 kg) = 2 1/4 cans; 50 lb (23 kg) = 2 2/3 cans; 60 lb (27 kg) = 3 cans; 70 lb (32 kg) = 3 1/3 cans; 80 lb (36 kg) = 3 2/3 cans; 100 lb (45 kg) = 4 1/3 cans; 120 lb (54 kg) = 5 cans (13 oz / 370 g cans). Gradually transition over 7 days or more; exclusively feed recommended Prescription Diet dry and wet foods; keep fresh water available.
Reviews
Trustpilot: 3.0/5 · 3 reviews
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists fish oil
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - white
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (18)
| # | As declared | Matched | Category | Tier | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Water | Water | other | - | - | 7.3 |
| 2 | Brewers Rice | Rice - white | carb | medium | - | 7.1 |
| 3 | Rice Protein Concentrate | Rice Protein | carb | medium | - | 6.9 |
| 4 | Egg Product | Egg | meat | good | - | 6.7 |
| 5 | Soybean Oil | Soybean oil | oil | medium | - | 6.5 |
| 6 | Coconut Oil | Coconut Oil | oil | medium | - | 6.3 |
| 7 | Flaxseed | Linseed | veg | good | - | 6.1 |
| 8 | Fish Oil | Fish Oil | oil | good | - | 5.9 |
| 9 | Hydrolyzed Chicken Flavor | Chicken | meat | medium | - | 5.7 |
| 10 | Rice | Rice - white | carb | medium | - | 5.5 |
| 11 | Dried Beet Pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre | medium | - | 5.3 |
| 12 | Calcium Carbonate | Calcium Carbonate | supplement | medium | - | 5.1 |
| 13 | Monosodium Phosphate | Sodium phosphate | additive | poor | - | 4.8 |
| 14 | Locust Bean Gum | Carob Flour | fibre | medium | - | 4.6 |
| 15 | Potassium Chloride | Potassium Chloride | supplement | medium | - | 4.4 |
| 16 | Carrageenan | Carrageenan | additive | poor | - | 4.2 |
| 17 | L-Lysine | Lysine | supplement | medium | - | 4.0 |
| 18 | Choline Chloride | Choline | supplement | good | - | 3.8 |
Brand
- Website
- https://www.hillspet.com/
- Contact page
- www.hillspet.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-18
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.hillspet.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Scored with model v3 on 2026-09-26. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.15 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 21.0% | -0.115 | -2.42 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 22.6% | -0.092 | -2.08 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 6.7% | -0.005 | -0.03 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 4.7% | 0.163 | +0.76 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 19.7% | -0.012 | -0.24 |
| Recipe graded poor | 4.2% | -0.065 | -0.28 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.2% | 0.060 | +0.25 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -5.26 | 0.222 | -1.17 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.15 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 21.0% | -0.115 | -2.42 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 22.6% | -0.092 | -2.08 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 6.7% | -0.005 | -0.03 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 4.7% | 0.163 | +0.76 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 19.7% | -0.012 | -0.24 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 4.2% | -0.065 | -0.28 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.2% | 0.060 | +0.25 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -5.26 | 0.222 | -1.17 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 52.6
- Final score
- 53/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 20 | 90.9 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 16.8 | 76.4 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 1.3 | 5.9 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Calcium | 0.8 | 3.6 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 54.5 |
| Phosphorus | 0.55 | 2.5 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 43.7 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.5 | 1.5 (band 1 to 2%) | 97.3 |
| Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3) | - | - | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 121 | 550 | 100 |
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.
Scored over 8 declared nutrients (combined weight 100); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 78% from the food type.
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
0/100 · limited — 1 checkable claim: 0 consistent, 1 contradicted.
Contradicted by the label
- "Single, high quality, intact animal protein to help avoid adverse reactions to food" — the declared label says otherwise on single protein.
8 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Visible skin improvement in 21 days in dogs with food sensitivities (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Nutrition shown to reduce night scratching & improve sleep quality (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Supports the skin barrier against environmental irritants- year round (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| S+OXSHIELD: Formulated to promote a urinary environment that reduces the risk of developing struvite & calcium oxalate crystals (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| With bioactives and phytonutrients to help normalize immune response (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Fortified with fatty acids to help support continued skin health (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Clinical nutrition specially formulated to help manage environmental & food sensitivities in dogs (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Single, high quality, intact animal protein to help avoid adverse reactions to food (on page) | Content | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
| Hill's Prescription Diet Derm Complete Dog Food provides complete and balanced nutrition for maintenance of adult dogs (on pack) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Other products from Hill's Pet Nutrition
See all products from Hill's Pet Nutrition
Alternatives to Derm Complete Rice & Egg Recipe Wet Dog Food
Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.
Community
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.