Goodness Gracious Gently Cooked Rabbit Recipe
Fresh Frozen · completeHigh meat
Our verdict
Is Goodness Gracious Gently Cooked Rabbit Recipe a good dog food?
We score it 56/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, venison, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists pollock
- Your dog avoids pork: the label lists pork liver
- Your dog avoids grain: it is listed as an ingredient
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (17)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 46.6%
- veg 34.8%
- oil 9.5%
- supplement 9.0%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rabbit | Rabbit | meat · good | - | 7.7 |
| 2 | pollock | Pollock | meat · good | - | 7.5 |
| 3 | pork liver | Pork Liver | meat · good | - | 7.2 |
| 4 | eggs | Egg | meat · good | - | 7.0 |
| 5 | broccoli | Broccoli | veg · good | - | 6.8 |
| 6 | spinach | Spinach | veg · good | - | 6.6 |
| 7 | carrot | Carrots | veg · good | - | 6.3 |
| 8 | pork kidney | Kidney | meat · good | - | 6.1 |
| 9 | strawberries | Strawberries | veg · good | - | 5.9 |
| 10 | mackerel | Mackerel | meat · good | - | 5.7 |
| 11 | oysters | Cooked Oysters | meat · good | - | 5.4 |
| 12 | organic sprouted sunflower seeds | Sunflower Seeds | veg · good | - | 5.2 |
| 13 | omega-3 fish oil (sardine, herring, mackerel, anchovy) | Fish Oil | oil · good | - | 5.0 |
| 14 | ground eggshell | Crushed Eggshells | supplement · good | - | 4.8 |
| 15 | organic wheat germ oil (vitamin E) | Wheatgerm Oil | oil · medium | - | 4.5 |
| 16 | nonfortified nutritional yeast | Yeast | supplement · good | - | 4.3 |
| 17 | organic dried kelp | Kelp | veg · good | - | 4.1 |
- 1. Rabbit7.7% estimated
- 2. pollock7.5% estimated
- 3. pork liver7.2% estimated
- 4. eggs7.0% estimated
- 5. broccoli6.8% estimated
- 6. spinach6.6% estimated
- 7. carrot6.3% estimated
- 8. pork kidney6.1% estimated
- 9. strawberries5.9% estimated
- 10. mackerel5.7% estimated
- 11. oysters5.4% estimated
- 12. organic sprouted sunflower seeds5.2% estimated
- 13. omega-3 fish oil (sardine, herring, mackerel, anchovy)5.0% estimated
- 14. ground eggshell4.8% estimated
- 15. organic wheat germ oil (vitamin E)4.5% estimated
- 16. nonfortified nutritional yeast4.3% estimated
- 17. organic dried kelp4.1% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 63% · Fat 18%
Declared analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed | Dry matter | Directory average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 63% | 63% | - |
| Fat | 18% | 18% | - |
| Fibre | 4% | 4% | - |
| Ash | 8% | 8% | - |
| Carbohydrates | 7% | 7% | - |
Energy: 35 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Ships frozen; only ships Monday–Tuesday to ensure freshness. Defrost before serving (implied by frozen fresh food format).
Feeding guide
Includes (4) 16 oz. packages; AAFCO Nutrient Profiles Rabbit Recipe. Recommended feeding guidelines referenced on page but not detailed in scraped text.
No additives recorded yet.
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14
Brand and contact: Goodness Gracious
- [email protected]
- Phone
- 781-990-1478
- Contact page
- goodnessgracioustreats.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-14
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- goodnessgracioustreats.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
We gave this recipe a score of 56 out of 100. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +8.4 points, while ingredients without printed percentages cost -10.6 points. The processing format took -2.4 off, and the oil and fat content cost -2 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.9 | 9.191 | +8.39 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 21.9% | -0.092 | -2.02 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 28.4% | -0.005 | -0.15 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 19.4% | -0.012 | -0.24 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.9 | 9.191 | +8.39 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 21.9% | -0.092 | -2.02 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 28.4% | -0.005 | -0.15 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 19.4% | -0.012 | -0.24 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -1.74
- Subtotal
- 56.3
- Final score
- 56/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 63 | 225 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 18 | 64.3 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 4 | 14.3 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 35 | 125 | 100 |
Fibre: Declared as a maximum; the high-fibre taper is not applied.
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 72% from the food type.
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) | 5/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "high protein, moderate fat, low carb food" — supported by the declared high protein data.
9 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| complete and balanced (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Holistic veterinarian designed (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Non-GMO fruits and vegetables (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Human Grade (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Very low glycemic load (.68) (on page) | High/low level | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Great Omega-6 : Omega-3 ratio of 1 : 1 (on page) | High/low level | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Fresh and lightly steamed (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| No vitamin or mineral powders (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| high protein, moderate fat, low carb food (on page) | High/low level | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100% scratch made. 0% outsourced (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Gently Cooked Rabbit Recipe
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.