Our verdict
Is v-dog Mini Bites a good dog food?
We score it 46/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Labelling or feeding guide is aimed at small dogs
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - brown / whole grain
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (24)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- carb 33.4%
- supplement 21.8%
- veg 20.0%
- additive 8.1%
- oil 4.8%
- fibre 4.6%
- meat 3.8%
- unknown 3.5%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dried Peas | Peas | veg · good | - | 5.5 |
| 2 | Pea Protein | Pea protein | carb · medium | - | 5.4 |
| 3 | Brown Rice | Rice - brown / whole grain | carb · medium | - | 5.3 |
| 4 | Oatmeal | Oats | carb · medium | - | 5.1 |
| 5 | Potato Protein | Potato protein | carb · medium | - | 5.0 |
| 6 | Sorghum | Sorghum | carb · medium | - | 4.9 |
| 7 | Canola Oil (preserved with Mixed Tocopherols) | Rapeseed oil | oil · good | - | 4.8 |
| 8 | Natural Flavor | Flavor | additive · poor | - | 4.7 |
| 9 | Suncured Alfalfa Meal | Alfalfa Meal | fibre · medium | - | 4.6 |
| 10 | Brewers Dried Yeast | Yeast | supplement · good | - | 4.5 |
| 11 | Dicalcium Phosphate | Dicalcium phosphate | supplement · medium | - | 4.3 |
| 12 | Flaxseeds | Linseed | veg · good | - | 4.2 |
| 13 | Millet | Millet | carb · good | - | 4.1 |
| 14 | Calcium Carbonate | Calcium Carbonate | supplement · medium | - | 4.0 |
| 15 | Lentils | Lentils | veg · medium | - | 3.9 |
| 16 | Peanut Hearts | Heart | meat · good | - | 3.8 |
| 17 | Quinoa | Quinoa | carb · good | - | 3.7 |
| 18 | Sunflower Chips | unmatched | - | - | 3.5 |
| 19 | Salt | Salt | additive · poor | - | 3.4 |
| 20 | Marine Microalgae (source of DHA) | Microalgae | veg · good | - | 3.3 |
| 21 | Potassium Chloride | Potassium Chloride | supplement · medium | - | 3.2 |
| 22 | Dried Chicory Root Inulin | Chicory root | veg · good | - | 3.1 |
| 23 | Choline Chloride | Choline | supplement · good | - | 3.0 |
| 24 | Taurine | Taurine | supplement · good | - | 2.9 |
- 1. Dried Peas5.5% estimated
- 2. Pea Protein5.4% estimated
- 3. Brown Rice5.3% estimated
- 4. Oatmeal5.1% estimated
- 5. Potato Protein5.0% estimated
- 6. Sorghum4.9% estimated
- 7. Canola Oil (preserved with Mixed Tocopherols)4.8% estimated
- 8. Natural Flavor4.7% estimated
- 9. Suncured Alfalfa Meal4.6% estimated
- 10. Brewers Dried Yeast4.5% estimated
- 11. Dicalcium Phosphate4.3% estimated
- 12. Flaxseeds4.2% estimated
- 13. Millet4.1% estimated
- 14. Calcium Carbonate4.0% estimated
- 15. Lentils3.9% estimated
- 16. Peanut Hearts3.8% estimated
- 17. Quinoa3.7% estimated
- 18. Sunflower Chips3.5% estimated
- 19. Salt3.4% estimated
- 20. Marine Microalgae (source of DHA)3.3% estimated
- 21. Potassium Chloride3.2% estimated
- 22. Dried Chicory Root Inulin3.1% estimated
- 23. Choline Chloride3.0% estimated
- 24. Taurine2.9% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 24% · Fat 9%
Declared analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 24% |
| Fat | 9% |
| Fibre | 5% |
| Moisture | 10% |
Energy: 330 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
We recommend 2 daily feedings. Up to 10 lbs = Up to 1 cup; 10-20 lbs = 1 to 1.5 cups; 20-30 lbs = 1.5 to 2.25 cups; 30-40 lbs = 2.25 to 2.75 cups; 40-60 lbs = 2.75 to 3.5 cups; 60-80 lbs = 3.5 to 4.5 cups; 80-100 lbs = 4.5 to 5.25+ cups. Add 1/4 cup for every 5 lbs over 60 lbs. Transition over 5-10 days.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin E Supplement; Vitamin A Supplement; Niacin Supplement; d-Calcium Pantothenate; Riboflavin Supplement; Vitamin D3 Supplement; Thiamine Mononitrate; Vitamin B12 Supplement; Pyridoxine Hydrochloride; Biotin; Folic Acid; L-Ascorbyl-2-Polyphosphate (source of Vitamin C); Choline Chloride; Taurine; Ferrous Sulfate; Zinc Sulfate; Copper Sulfate; Sodium Selenite; Manganese Sulfate; Calcium Iodate
Technological additives
preserved with Citric Acid; preserved with Mixed Tocopherols; Canola Oil preserved with Mixed Tocopherols; Rosemary Extract
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-13
Brand and contact: v-dog
- Website
- https://v-dog.com/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-13
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- v-dog.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 0.0/5 · 0 reviews
388 reviews on this product · 5.0/5
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves a final score of 46 out of 100 based on several key factors. The overall quality of the ingredient list added +5.3 points. However, ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -10.6. Additionally, the processing format deducted -6.7 and the carbohydrate content contributed -3.8.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.25 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 32.7% | -0.115 | -3.76 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 5.9% | -0.092 | -0.54 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 18.7% | -0.005 | -0.10 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 9.1% | 0.163 | +1.48 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 25.0% | -0.012 | -0.30 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 2.2% | -0.027 | -0.06 |
| Recipe graded poor | 8.1% | -0.065 | -0.53 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.7% | 0.060 | +0.28 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -9.79 | 0.222 | -2.17 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.25 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 32.7% | -0.115 | -3.76 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 5.9% | -0.092 | -0.54 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 18.7% | -0.005 | -0.10 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 9.1% | 0.163 | +1.48 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 25.0% | -0.012 | -0.30 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 2.2% | -0.027 | -0.06 |
| Recipe graded poor | 8.1% | -0.065 | -0.53 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.7% | 0.060 | +0.28 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -9.79 | 0.222 | -2.17 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 45.7
- Final score
- 46/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 24 | 26.5 (band 18 to 40%) | 93.2 |
| Fat | 9 | 9.9 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 88.4 |
| Fibre | 5 | 5.5 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 330 | 364.6 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 20 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin E Supplement
- Vitamin A Supplement
- Niacin Supplement
- d-Calcium Pantothenate
- Riboflavin Supplement
- Vitamin D3 Supplement
- Thiamine Mononitrate
- Vitamin B12 Supplement
- Pyridoxine Hydrochloride
- Biotin
- Folic Acid
- L-Ascorbyl-2-Polyphosphate (source of Vitamin C)
- Choline Chloride
- Taurine
- Ferrous Sulfate
- Zinc Sulfate
- Copper Sulfate
- Sodium Selenite
- Manganese Sulfate
- Calcium Iodate
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
50/100 · limited — 4 checkable claims: 2 consistent, 2 contradicted.
Contradicted by the label
- "free of animal products, fillers, corn, soy, and wheat" — the declared label says otherwise on grain-free.
- "24% high-quality protein" — the declared label says otherwise on high protein.
Consistent with the label
- "complete and balanced plant-powered kibble" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
- "AAFCO-approved, nutritionally complete dog food" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
6 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| hypoallergenic formula (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| added taurine, plant-based DHA, and essential omega 3 and 6 fatty acids (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| free of animal products, fillers, corn, soy, and wheat (on page) | Free-from | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
| complete and balanced plant-powered kibble (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| AAFCO-approved, nutritionally complete dog food (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| source of mega DHA (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Exceeds AAFCO standards (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 24% high-quality protein (on page) | High/low level | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
| Allergy-friendly, developed without the top allergens (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Cruelty-free, good for the planet (on page) | provenance | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Mini Bites
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.