Darwin's Natural Pet Products Natural Selections Premium Duck

Raw complete

Natural Selections Premium Duck
Average
our rating

Is Darwin's Natural Pet Products Natural Selections Premium Duck a good dog food?

We score it 69/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

How we score

Why this score?

The product earned a score of 69 out of 100. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +4.9 points, while ingredients without printed percentages cost -2.7 points. Being labelled nutritionally complete added +2.3 points, and printing percentages for most of the recipe gave a further +1 points.

26% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.

Why you might choose it

  • Scores 69, in the top quarter of raw foods we track.
  • Doesn't list grain ingredients.

Why you might not

  • Meat makes up an estimated 3% of the dry matter (8% as fed); carbohydrates dominate.
  • No analytical breakdown is published.
  • Needs freezer space and defrosting before serving.

View the source page

Estimated composition

mineral76.3%
veg10.1%
meat8.3%
oil2.8%
fibre1.3%
supplement1.2%

Typical analysis (as fed)

No analysis recorded yet.

Additives & feeding info

Nutritional additives

Proprietary Vitamin and Mineral Mix

Feeding guide

As a general rule, an adult pet should consume about 2-3% of their ideal body weight of Darwin's raw food per day. Typically, smaller pets should eat a higher percentage of their body weight, while larger pets should eat a lower percentage. Transition: Day 1-3 mix 25% Darwin's with 75% previous food; Day 4-6 increase to 50%; Day 7-9 feed mostly Darwin's; Day 10 transition to 100% Darwin's.

Reviews

Trustpilot: 4.7/5 · 2,978 reviews

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
  • Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
  • Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids fish: the label lists fish oil
  • Your dog avoids duck: it is listed as an ingredient
  • You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.

Ingredients (16)

#As declaredMatchedCategoryTierDeclared %Est. %
1Antibiotic-Free MeatFresh Meatmeatmedium-2.2
274.16%): Whole Duck (including boneBonemineralmedium74.1674.2
3Duck Heads (including bone)Bonemineralmedium-2.2
4Duck GizzardsGizzardmeatgood-2.1
5Duck LiversLivermeatgood-2.0
6and Duck HeartsHeartmeatgood-1.9
7Organic Vegetables (24.64%): Sweet PotatoVegetablesvegmedium-1.9
8LettuceLettucevegmedium-1.8
9Squash (seasonal)Butternut Squashveggood-1.7
10CarrotsCarrotsveggood-1.6
11CeleryCelery Seedsveggood-1.6
12and ParsleyParsleyveggood-1.5
13Special Nutrient Mix (1.20%): Organic Sunflower Seed OilSunflower oiloilgood-1.4
14Fish OilFish Oiloilgood-1.3
15Pea FiberPea Fibrefibremedium-1.3
16Proprietary Vitamin and Mineral Mix.Vitaminsupplementgood-1.2

Brand

Darwin's Natural Pet Products logo
Phone
877-738-6325
Contact page
www.darwinspet.com

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-18
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)
Product page
www.darwinspet.com

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Scored with model v3 on 2026-09-26. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.59.191+4.94
Oil share of dry matter3.4%-0.092-0.31
Vegetable share of dry matter1.9%-0.005-0.01
Supplement share of dry matter1.4%-0.012-0.02
Undeclared quantities25.8%-0.106-2.73
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
Processing multiplier1.1233.786+37.84
Processing: Rawyes-0.054-0.05
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.59.191+4.94
Meat share of dry matter0.0%0.096+0.00
Carb share of dry matter0.0%-0.115+0.00
Oil share of dry matter3.4%-0.092-0.31
Vegetable share of dry matter1.9%-0.005-0.01
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter1.4%-0.012-0.02
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.375+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor0.0%-0.065+0.00
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients0-0.876+0.00
Largest single poor ingredient0.0%0.060+0.00
Undeclared quantities25.8%-0.106-2.73
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no0.707+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty0.000.222+0.00
Processing multiplier1.1233.786+37.84
Processing: Rawyes-0.054-0.05
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
-1.74
Additives declared on label
+1 transparency bonus
Subtotal
69.0
Final score
69/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

Analytical constituents not declared

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (74.2% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)14.8/20
✗ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file0/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)5/10
✗ Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

50/100 · limited — 2 checkable claims: 1 consistent, 1 contradicted.

Contradicted by the label

  • "Single-protein recipe" — the declared label says otherwise on single protein.

Consistent with the label

  • "No fillers, no grains" — supported by the declared grain-free data.

13 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.

Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
Duck offers superior levels of amino and essential fatty acids (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
The ground bones provide high levels of calcium (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Complete and balanced for all life stages (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Specifically formulated to be gentle on sensitive stomachs and to minimize allergic reactions (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Healthy Microbiome Approved (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
No fillers, no grains (on page)Free-fromconsistentManufacturer assertion
Single-protein recipe (on page)ContentcontradictedManufacturer assertion
Antibiotic-free meats (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Organic vegetables (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Hormone-free and Antibiotic-free (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Human-Grade Ingredients (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Free from artificial preservatives, colors, and fillers (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Duck is naturally high in protein (on page)High/low levelnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Organic produce adds A, B-complex, C, and D vitamins (on page)Nutrientnot checkableManufacturer assertion
USDA-quality ingredients (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Other products from Darwin's Natural Pet Products

See all products from Darwin's Natural Pet Products

Alternatives to Natural Selections Premium Duck

Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.

See all alternatives

Community

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.