Darwin's Natural Pet Products Natural Selections Premium Duck
Raw · complete
Our verdict
Is Darwin's Natural Pet Products Natural Selections Premium Duck a good dog food?
We score it 69/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
26% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists fish oil
- Your dog avoids duck: it is listed as an ingredient
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (16)26% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- mineral 76.3%
- veg 10.1%
- meat 8.3%
- oil 2.8%
- fibre 1.3%
- supplement 1.2%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Antibiotic-Free Meat | Fresh Meat | meat · medium | - | 2.2 |
| 2 | 74.16%): Whole Duck (including bone | Bone | mineral · medium | 74.16 | 74.2 |
| 3 | Duck Heads (including bone) | Bone | mineral · medium | - | 2.2 |
| 4 | Duck Gizzards | Gizzard | meat · good | - | 2.1 |
| 5 | Duck Livers | Liver | meat · good | - | 2.0 |
| 6 | Duck Hearts | Heart | meat · good | - | 1.9 |
| 7 | Organic Vegetables (24.64%): Sweet Potato | Vegetables | veg · medium | - | 1.9 |
| 8 | Lettuce | Lettuce | veg · medium | - | 1.8 |
| 9 | Squash (seasonal) | Butternut Squash | veg · good | - | 1.7 |
| 10 | Carrots | Carrots | veg · good | - | 1.6 |
| 11 | Celery | Celery Seeds | veg · good | - | 1.6 |
| 12 | Parsley | Parsley | veg · good | - | 1.5 |
| 13 | Special Nutrient Mix (1.20%): Organic Sunflower Seed Oil | Sunflower oil | oil · good | - | 1.4 |
| 14 | Fish Oil | Fish Oil | oil · good | - | 1.3 |
| 15 | Pea Fiber | Pea Fibre | fibre · medium | - | 1.3 |
| 16 | Proprietary Vitamin and Mineral Mix | Vitamin | supplement · good | - | 1.2 |
- 1. Antibiotic-Free Meat2.2% estimated
- 2. 74.16%): Whole Duck (including bone74.16% declared74.2% estimated
- 3. Duck Heads (including bone)2.2% estimated
- 4. Duck Gizzards2.1% estimated
- 5. Duck Livers2.0% estimated
- 6. Duck Hearts1.9% estimated
- 7. Organic Vegetables (24.64%): Sweet Potato1.9% estimated
- 8. Lettuce1.8% estimated
- 9. Squash (seasonal)1.7% estimated
- 10. Carrots1.6% estimated
- 11. Celery1.6% estimated
- 12. Parsley1.5% estimated
- 13. Special Nutrient Mix (1.20%): Organic Sunflower Seed Oil1.4% estimated
- 14. Fish Oil1.3% estimated
- 15. Pea Fiber1.3% estimated
- 16. Proprietary Vitamin and Mineral Mix1.2% estimated
Nutrition and feeding
Declared analysis (as fed)
No analysis recorded yet.
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
As a general rule, an adult pet should consume about 2-3% of their ideal body weight of Darwin's raw food per day. Typically, smaller pets should eat a higher percentage of their body weight, while larger pets should eat a lower percentage. Transition: Day 1-3 mix 25% Darwin's with 75% previous food; Day 4-6 increase to 50%; Day 7-9 feed mostly Darwin's; Day 10 transition to 100% Darwin's.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Proprietary Vitamin and Mineral Mix
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-28
Brand and contact: Darwin's Natural Pet Products
- Website
- https://www.darwinspet.com/
- Phone
- 877-738-6325
- Contact page
- www.darwinspet.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-28
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.darwinspet.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 4.7/5 · 2,978 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The product earned a score of 69 out of 100. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +4.9 points, while ingredients without printed percentages cost -2.7 points. Being labelled nutritionally complete added +2.3 points, and printing percentages for most of the recipe gave a further +1 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.94 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 3.4% | -0.092 | -0.31 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 1.9% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 1.4% | -0.012 | -0.02 |
| Undeclared quantities | 25.8% | -0.106 | -2.73 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.12 | 33.786 | +37.84 |
| Processing: Raw | yes | -0.054 | -0.05 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.94 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 3.4% | -0.092 | -0.31 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 1.9% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 1.4% | -0.012 | -0.02 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 25.8% | -0.106 | -2.73 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.12 | 33.786 | +37.84 |
| Processing: Raw | yes | -0.054 | -0.05 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -1.74
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 69.0
- Final score
- 69/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
Analytical constituents not declared
Declared fortification: 1 nutritional additive on the label
- Proprietary Vitamin and Mineral Mix
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (74.2% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 14.8/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
50/100 · limited — 2 checkable claims: 1 consistent, 1 contradicted.
Contradicted by the label
- "Single-protein recipe" — the declared label says otherwise on single protein.
Consistent with the label
- "No fillers, no grains" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
13 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Duck offers superior levels of amino and essential fatty acids (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| The ground bones provide high levels of calcium (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Complete and balanced for all life stages (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Specifically formulated to be gentle on sensitive stomachs and to minimize allergic reactions (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Healthy Microbiome Approved (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| No fillers, no grains (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Single-protein recipe (on page) | Content | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
| Antibiotic-free meats (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Organic vegetables (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Hormone-free and Antibiotic-free (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Human-Grade Ingredients (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Free from artificial preservatives, colors, and fillers (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Duck is naturally high in protein (on page) | High/low level | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Organic produce adds A, B-complex, C, and D vitamins (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| USDA-quality ingredients (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Natural Selections Premium Duck
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.