Cloud Star Gut Health Slices Chicken
Treat complementary
Is Cloud Star Gut Health Slices Chicken a good dog food?
This is a treat, not a complete diet, so it is not scored on our 1-100 scale. The ingredient breakdown below shows what is in it; a treat should be fed alongside, not instead of, a complete diet.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
- RecipeNot applicable
- NutritionalNot applicable
- Transparency50
- Safety100
- EvidenceNot recorded
Why you might choose it
- Doesn't list grain ingredients.
- Declares energy content, which most labels omit.
Why you might not
- A treat, not a complete diet: feed as an extra, not the whole diet.
- 100% of the recipe mass has no printed percentage, so the exact split cannot be verified.
- Its additive load costs about 5 points in the rating.
What the label tells us
- The label lists 23 ingredients.
- Uses generic terms (Chicken, Cow's Milk): the specific animal source is not stated.
- Lists no artificial colours or preservatives.
- Prints no ingredient quantities.
Why is this treat not scored?
Our 1 to 100 rating applies to complete diets, so treats and complementary foods are presented as what the label tells us rather than a number that would invite comparison with complete meals.
What should I look for on a treat label?
A short ingredient list, named animal sources instead of generic terms, and no artificial colours or preservatives. Printed quantities are a good transparency signal, though few treat labels provide them.
These points are derived from the published ingredient list, not a rating.
Estimated composition
Typical analysis (as fed)
- Protein
- 22%
- Fat
- 5%
- Fibre
- 3%
- Moisture
- 30%
Energy: 47 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
No additives recorded yet.
Feeding guide
This product is intended for intermittent or supplemental feeding only. Dogswell treats are not intended to replace your dog's diet. Break into smaller pieces for small dogs. Dog Weight / Treats per day: 5–10 lbs ½–1; 11–20 lbs 1–2; 21–80 lbs 1–3; 81+ lbs 1–4.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Labelling or feeding guide is aimed at small dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
- Your dog avoids beef: the label lists cow's milk
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (24)
| # | As declared | Matched | Category | Tier | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chicken | Chicken | meat | medium | - | 5.5 |
| 2 | Pea Flour | Pea flour | carb | medium | - | 5.4 |
| 3 | Cane Sugar | Sugars | additive | poor | - | 5.3 |
| 4 | Vegetable Glycerin | Glycerine | other | medium | - | 5.1 |
| 5 | Sweet Potatoes | Sweet Potatoes | carb | good | - | 5.0 |
| 6 | Flaxseed Meal | Linseed | veg | good | - | 4.9 |
| 7 | Pumpkin | Pumpkin | veg | good | - | 4.8 |
| 8 | Salt | Salt | additive | medium | - | 4.7 |
| 9 | Dried Cultured Skim Milk | Cow's Milk | meat | medium | - | 4.6 |
| 10 | Tomato | Tomato | veg | good | - | 4.5 |
| 11 | Natural Smoke Flavor | Smoked Flavour | additive | poor | - | 4.3 |
| 12 | Apple | Apples | veg | good | - | 4.2 |
| 13 | Natural Chicken Flavor | Chicken | meat | medium | - | 4.1 |
| 14 | Yeast Culture | Yeast | supplement | good | - | 4.0 |
| 15 | Mixed Tocopherols (preservative) | Tocopherols | additive | good | - | 3.9 |
| 16 | Paprika | Paprika | veg | medium | - | 3.8 |
| 17 | Ginger | Ginger | veg | good | - | 3.7 |
| 18 | Rosemary Extract | Rosemary | veg | good | - | 3.5 |
| 19 | Dried Bacillus Subtilis Fermentation Product | Bacillus Subtilis | supplement | good | - | 3.4 |
| 20 | Dried Lactobacillus Plantarum Fermentation Product | Lactobacillus plantarum | supplement | good | - | 3.3 |
| 21 | Dried Enterococcus Faecium Fermentation Product | Enterococcus Faecium | supplement | good | - | 3.2 |
| 22 | Dried Lactobacillus Acidophilus Fermentation Product | Dried Lactobacillus acidophilus Fermentation Product | supplement | good | - | 3.1 |
| 23 | Dried Lactobacillus Reuteri Fermentation Product | Limosilactobacillus reuteri | supplement | good | - | 3.0 |
| 24 | Dried Bifidobacterium Animalis Fermentation Product | unmatched | - | - | - | 2.9 |
Brand
- Website
- https://cloudstar.com/
- [email protected]
- Phone
- 800.361.9079
- Address
- P.O. Box 901, Chesterfield, MO 63006
- Contact page
- cloudstar.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-18
- Product page
- cloudstar.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Scored with model v3 on 2026-09-26. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.71 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 9.3% | -0.115 | -1.07 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 20.9% | -0.005 | -0.11 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 25.0% | 0.163 | +4.07 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 28.1% | -0.012 | -0.34 |
| Other share of dry matter | 3.9% | -0.375 | -1.47 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 2.2% | -0.027 | -0.06 |
| Recipe graded poor | 9.6% | -0.065 | -0.62 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 5.3% | 0.060 | +0.32 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -22.08 | 0.222 | -4.90 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.97 | 33.786 | +32.77 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | yes | -6.174 | -6.17 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.71 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 9.3% | -0.115 | -1.07 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 20.9% | -0.005 | -0.11 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 25.0% | 0.163 | +4.07 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 28.1% | -0.012 | -0.34 |
| Other share of dry matter | 3.9% | -0.375 | -1.47 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 2.2% | -0.027 | -0.06 |
| Recipe graded poor | 9.6% | -0.065 | -0.62 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 5.3% | 0.060 | +0.32 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -22.08 | 0.222 | -4.90 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.97 | 33.786 | +32.77 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | yes | -6.174 | -6.17 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.05
- Subtotal
- 42.5
- Final score
- 43/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
This is not a complete diet, so the 1-100 rating does not apply to it. Read the recipe breakdown above as ingredient-quality context only.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
Not applicable to complementary food. FEDIAF reference ranges apply to complete diets.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Soft Slices that taste good and do good! (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| support dogs' whole-body health (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Digestive Support with Probiotics (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Supplemental Benefits (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Clean Ingredients (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Real Proteins (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Intentional Formulas (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Real Chicken is the 1st Ingredient (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Made from high-quality protein and supplemental benefits (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Other products from Cloud Star
See all products from Cloud Star
Community
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.