Blackwood Pet Food Turkey & Turkey Liver With Pumpkin and New Zealand Green Mussels
Wet Pate · complete
Our verdict
Is Blackwood Pet Food Turkey & Turkey Liver With Pumpkin and New Zealand Green Mussels a good dog food?
We score it 52/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists turkey
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists mussels
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (31)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- supplement 54.1%
- veg 15.4%
- meat 11.8%
- additive 7.6%
- other 4.2%
- oil 3.6%
- mineral 3.4%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Turkey | Turkey | meat · medium | - | 4.3 |
| 2 | turkey broth | Cooking broth | other · medium | - | 4.2 |
| 3 | turkey liver | Turkey liver | meat · good | - | 4.1 |
| 4 | pumpkin | Pumpkin | veg · good | - | 4.0 |
| 5 | peas | Peas | veg · good | - | 4.0 |
| 6 | agar-agar | Agar-agar | additive · medium | - | 3.9 |
| 7 | carrots | Carrots | veg · good | - | 3.8 |
| 8 | potassium chloride | Potassium Chloride | supplement · medium | - | 3.8 |
| 9 | salt | Salt | additive · poor | - | 3.7 |
| 10 | choline chloride | Choline | supplement · good | - | 3.6 |
| 11 | salmon oil | Salmon Oil | oil · good | - | 3.6 |
| 12 | dandelion greens | Dandelion Leaves | veg · good | - | 3.5 |
| 13 | dried New Zealand green mussels | Mussels | meat · good | - | 3.4 |
| 14 | iron proteinate | Iron Proteinate | mineral · good | - | 3.4 |
| 15 | zinc proteinate | Zinc Proteinate | supplement · good | - | 3.3 |
| 16 | manganese proteinate | Manganese proteinate | supplement · good | - | 3.2 |
| 17 | copper proteinate | Copper proteinate | supplement · good | - | 3.2 |
| 18 | magnesium proteinate | Magnesium Oxide | supplement · good | - | 3.1 |
| 19 | sodium selenite | Sodium selenite | supplement · poor | - | 3.0 |
| 20 | calcium iodate | Calcium iodate | supplement · medium | - | 3.0 |
| 21 | vitamin E supplement | Vitamin E | supplement · good | - | 2.9 |
| 22 | thiamine mononitrate | Thiamine mononitrate | supplement · good | - | 2.8 |
| 23 | niacin supplement | Niacin | supplement · good | - | 2.7 |
| 24 | calcium pantothenate | Calcium pantothenate | supplement · good | - | 2.7 |
| 25 | biotin | Biotin | supplement · good | - | 2.6 |
| 26 | vitamin A supplement | Vitamin A | supplement · good | - | 2.5 |
| 27 | riboflavin supplement | Riboflavin | supplement · good | - | 2.5 |
| 28 | vitamin D3 supplement | Vitamin D3 supplement | supplement · good | - | 2.4 |
| 29 | vitamin B12 supplement | Vitamin B12 | supplement · good | - | 2.3 |
| 30 | pyridoxine hydrochloride | Pyridoxine hydrochloride | supplement · good | - | 2.3 |
| 31 | folic acid | Folic acid | supplement · good | - | 2.2 |
- 1. Turkey4.3% estimated
- 2. turkey broth4.2% estimated
- 3. turkey liver4.1% estimated
- 4. pumpkin4.0% estimated
- 5. peas4.0% estimated
- 6. agar-agar3.9% estimated
- 7. carrots3.8% estimated
- 8. potassium chloride3.8% estimated
- 9. salt3.7% estimated
- 10. choline chloride3.6% estimated
- 11. salmon oil3.6% estimated
- 12. dandelion greens3.5% estimated
- 13. dried New Zealand green mussels3.4% estimated
- 14. iron proteinate3.4% estimated
- 15. zinc proteinate3.3% estimated
- 16. manganese proteinate3.2% estimated
- 17. copper proteinate3.2% estimated
- 18. magnesium proteinate3.1% estimated
- 19. sodium selenite3.0% estimated
- 20. calcium iodate3.0% estimated
- 21. vitamin E supplement2.9% estimated
- 22. thiamine mononitrate2.8% estimated
- 23. niacin supplement2.7% estimated
- 24. calcium pantothenate2.7% estimated
- 25. biotin2.6% estimated
- 26. vitamin A supplement2.5% estimated
- 27. riboflavin supplement2.5% estimated
- 28. vitamin D3 supplement2.4% estimated
- 29. vitamin B12 supplement2.3% estimated
- 30. pyridoxine hydrochloride2.3% estimated
- 31. folic acid2.2% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 9.50%
Declared analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 9.50% |
| Fibre | 1.50% |
| Ash | 2% |
| Moisture | 78% |
Energy: 124.8 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Food should be fed at room temperature. Promptly refrigerate the unused portion. Fresh, clean water should be kept available to the dog at all times.
Feeding guide
Adult: feed ¾ to 1¼ cans per 15 lbs. of body weight per day. Puppy: feed up to twice the adult amount per day. Gestation and lactation: feed up to three times the adult amount per day. For combination feeding, feed ⅓ cup less dry food for every ½ can of wet food.
No additives recorded yet.
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14
Brand and contact: Blackwood Pet Food
- [email protected]
- Phone
- 1.888.843.1738; 330.424.9700
- Contact page
- blackwoodpetfood.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-14
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- blackwoodpetfood.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves a total score of 52 out of 100 based on several key factors. The presence of ingredients without printed percentages contributed -10.6 to the overall rating, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added +5.9. Furthermore, the additive load contributed -2, and the additives in the recipe adjusted the score by +1.6.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.85 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 5.0% | -0.092 | -0.46 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 3.2% | -0.005 | -0.02 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 9.6% | 0.163 | +1.56 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 69.7% | -0.012 | -0.85 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.3% | -0.375 | -0.11 |
| Recipe graded poor | 6.7% | -0.065 | -0.44 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 3.7% | 0.060 | +0.22 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -9.22 | 0.222 | -2.05 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.85 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 5.0% | -0.092 | -0.46 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 3.2% | -0.005 | -0.02 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 9.6% | 0.163 | +1.56 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 69.7% | -0.012 | -0.85 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.3% | -0.375 | -0.11 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 6.7% | -0.065 | -0.44 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 3.7% | 0.060 | +0.22 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -9.22 | 0.222 | -2.05 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Subtotal
- 52.2
- Final score
- 52/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 9.5 | 43.2 (band 25.52727272727273 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 1.5 | 6.8 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 124.8 | 567.3 | 100 |
Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 45); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 78% from the food type.
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · strong — 3 checkable claims: 3 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "No Wheat" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
- "Grain Free" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
- "No Corn" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
4 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Strong: at least three checkable claims, all consistent with the declared label, and no compliance cap.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| No Wheat (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Completed and balanced for all life stages including growth of large size dogs (70 lb. or more as an adult) (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Grain Free (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| No Soy (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| No Corn (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Holistic, natural, super-premium turkey protein (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Served as a meal or a dog food topper (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Turkey & Turkey Liver With Pumpkin and New Zealand Green Mussels
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.