Our verdict
Is BARF World Freeze-Dried Lamb Nuggets a good dog food?
We score it 67/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids lamb: the label lists lamb
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists fish oil
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (25)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- veg 37.1%
- supplement 25.9%
- meat 20.2%
- mineral 5.1%
- fibre 4.4%
- additive 3.8%
- oil 3.6%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lamb | Lamb | meat · medium | - | 5.3 |
| 2 | Lamb Liver | Lambs Liver | meat · good | - | 5.2 |
| 3 | Finely Ground Lamb Bone | Bone | mineral · medium | - | 5.1 |
| 4 | Lamb Kidney | Lamb Kidney | meat · good | - | 4.9 |
| 5 | Egg | Egg | meat · good | - | 4.8 |
| 6 | Broccoli | Broccoli | veg · good | - | 4.7 |
| 7 | Celery | Celery Seeds | veg · good | - | 4.6 |
| 8 | Carrot | Carrots | veg · good | - | 4.5 |
| 9 | Dehydrated Alfalfa Meal | Alfalfa Meal | fibre · medium | - | 4.4 |
| 10 | Ground Flaxseed | Ground Flaxseed (2%) | supplement · good | - | 4.3 |
| 11 | Apple | Apples | veg · good | - | 4.2 |
| 12 | Pear | Pears | veg · good | - | 4.1 |
| 13 | Grapefruit | Grapefruit | veg · medium | - | 4.0 |
| 14 | Orange | Orange | veg · medium | - | 3.9 |
| 15 | Salt | Salt | additive · poor | - | 3.8 |
| 16 | Dried Kelp | Kelp | veg · good | - | 3.7 |
| 17 | Fish Oil | Fish Oil | oil · good | - | 3.6 |
| 18 | Potassium Chloride | Potassium Chloride | supplement · medium | - | 3.5 |
| 19 | Calcium Carbonate | Calcium Carbonate | supplement · medium | - | 3.4 |
| 20 | Garlic | Garlic | veg · medium | - | 3.3 |
| 21 | MonoCalcium DiCalcium Phosphate | Dicalcium phosphate | supplement · medium | - | 3.2 |
| 22 | Mannon Oligosaccharide | Mannanoligosaccharides | supplement · good | - | 3.1 |
| 23 | Alpha Tocopherol Acetate (form of natural Vitamin E) | Vitamin E | supplement · good | - | 2.9 |
| 24 | Zinc Oxide | Zinc Oxide | supplement · good | - | 2.8 |
| 25 | Manganous Oxide | Manganese (II) Oxide | supplement · good | - | 2.7 |
- 1. Lamb5.3% estimated
- 2. Lamb Liver5.2% estimated
- 3. Finely Ground Lamb Bone5.1% estimated
- 4. Lamb Kidney4.9% estimated
- 5. Egg4.8% estimated
- 6. Broccoli4.7% estimated
- 7. Celery4.6% estimated
- 8. Carrot4.5% estimated
- 9. Dehydrated Alfalfa Meal4.4% estimated
- 10. Ground Flaxseed4.3% estimated
- 11. Apple4.2% estimated
- 12. Pear4.1% estimated
- 13. Grapefruit4.0% estimated
- 14. Orange3.9% estimated
- 15. Salt3.8% estimated
- 16. Dried Kelp3.7% estimated
- 17. Fish Oil3.6% estimated
- 18. Potassium Chloride3.5% estimated
- 19. Calcium Carbonate3.4% estimated
- 20. Garlic3.3% estimated
- 21. MonoCalcium DiCalcium Phosphate3.2% estimated
- 22. Mannon Oligosaccharide3.1% estimated
- 23. Alpha Tocopherol Acetate (form of natural Vitamin E)2.9% estimated
- 24. Zinc Oxide2.8% estimated
- 25. Manganous Oxide2.7% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 43% · Fat 38%
Declared analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 43% |
| Fat | 38% |
| Fibre | 2.20% |
| Moisture | 8% |
| Calcium | 1.20% |
| Phosphorus | 1% |
Energy: 357 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
No additives recorded yet.
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14
Brand and contact: BARF World
- Website
- https://barfworld.com/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-14
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- barfworld.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The overall score was 67 out of 100. Undeclared ingredient shares, meaning ingredients without printed percentages, contributed -10.6 points. The processing format contributed +6.6 points, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added +5.8 points. Finally, being labelled nutritionally complete contributed +2.3 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.76 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 6.6% | -0.092 | -0.61 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 15.5% | -0.005 | -0.08 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 6.4% | 0.163 | +1.04 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 44.5% | -0.012 | -0.54 |
| Recipe graded poor | 3.8% | -0.065 | -0.25 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 3.8% | 0.060 | +0.23 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -4.62 | 0.222 | -1.03 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.11 | 33.786 | +37.50 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | yes | 6.629 | +6.63 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.76 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 6.6% | -0.092 | -0.61 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 15.5% | -0.005 | -0.08 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 6.4% | 0.163 | +1.04 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 44.5% | -0.012 | -0.54 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 3.8% | -0.065 | -0.25 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 3.8% | 0.060 | +0.23 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -4.62 | 0.222 | -1.03 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.11 | 33.786 | +37.50 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | yes | 6.629 | +6.63 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.06
- Subtotal
- 67.3
- Final score
- 67/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 43 | 45.7 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 38 | 40.4 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 2.2 | 2.3 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 94.5 |
| Calcium | 1.2 | 1.3 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 93.3 |
| Phosphorus | 1 | 1.1 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.2 | 1.2 (band 1 to 2%) | 82 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 357 | 379.8 | 100 |
Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 90); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 6% from the food type.
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| High in essential fatty acids (good for dry, itchy, skin conditions and for pets prone to weight loss) (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Contains high levels of iron and zinc, which promote healthy skin and reproductive health (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| formulated to meet the nutritional levels established by the Association of American Feed Control Officials (AAFCO) Food Nutrient Profiles for all life stages (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| shelf stable for 18 months without refrigeration (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Low in calcium and moderately low in magnesium (ideal for pets prone to bladder stones) (on pack) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| convenience of a dry food, the nutrition of fresh and juicy, raw meat (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Freeze-Dried Lamb Nuggets
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.