Albright's Raw Pet Food Salty Dog Senior Complete Recipe
Raw · completeHigh meat
Our verdict
Is Albright's Raw Pet Food Salty Dog Senior Complete Recipe a good dog food?
We score it 60/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for senior dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, lamb, venison, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids beef: the label lists beef kidney
- Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists turkey
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists sardines
- Your dog avoids pork: the label lists pork
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (17)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 55.2%
- veg 40.5%
- oil 4.3%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Turkey | Turkey | meat · medium | - | 7.7 |
| 2 | Pork Heart | Pork (heart) | meat · good | - | 7.5 |
| 3 | Turkey Gizzard | Turkey Gizzard | meat · good | - | 7.2 |
| 4 | Sardines | Sardines | meat · good | - | 7.0 |
| 5 | Turkey Liver | Turkey liver | meat · good | - | 6.8 |
| 6 | Eggs | Egg | meat · good | - | 6.6 |
| 7 | Beef Trachea | Trachea | meat · good | - | 6.3 |
| 8 | Beef Kidney | Beef Kidney | meat · good | - | 6.1 |
| 9 | Organic Blueberries | Blueberries | veg · good | - | 5.9 |
| 10 | Organic Broccoli | Broccoli | veg · good | - | 5.7 |
| 11 | Organic Cabbage | Cabbage | veg · good | - | 5.4 |
| 12 | Organic Kale | Kale | veg · good | - | 5.2 |
| 13 | Organic Cranberries | Cranberries | veg · good | - | 5.0 |
| 14 | Organic Dried Kelp | Kelp | veg · good | - | 4.8 |
| 15 | Organic Dandelion | Dandelion Root | veg · good | - | 4.5 |
| 16 | Cod Liver Oil | Cod Liver Oil | oil · good | - | 4.3 |
| 17 | Organic Turmeric | Turmeric | veg · good | - | 4.1 |
- 1. Turkey7.7% estimated
- 2. Pork Heart7.5% estimated
- 3. Turkey Gizzard7.2% estimated
- 4. Sardines7.0% estimated
- 5. Turkey Liver6.8% estimated
- 6. Eggs6.6% estimated
- 7. Beef Trachea6.3% estimated
- 8. Beef Kidney6.1% estimated
- 9. Organic Blueberries5.9% estimated
- 10. Organic Broccoli5.7% estimated
- 11. Organic Cabbage5.4% estimated
- 12. Organic Kale5.2% estimated
- 13. Organic Cranberries5.0% estimated
- 14. Organic Dried Kelp4.8% estimated
- 15. Organic Dandelion4.5% estimated
- 16. Cod Liver Oil4.3% estimated
- 17. Organic Turmeric4.1% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 14.50% · Fat 11%
Guaranteed analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 14.50% |
| Fat | 11% |
| Fibre | 0.70% |
| Ash | 2.20% |
| Moisture | 69.80% |
Energy: 158 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
No additives recorded yet.
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14
Brand and contact: Albright's Raw Pet Food
- Phone
- 866-729-4738
- Address
- 1025 Osage Street, Fort Wayne, IN 46808
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-14
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.albrightsrawdogfood.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: - · 7 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The product scores 60 out of 100. Undeclared ingredient shares, meaning ingredients without printed percentages, weighed on the result at -10.6. The overall quality of the ingredient list lifted the score by +8.7. The oil and fat content pulled it down by -1.2, and the vegetable and fruit content took off another -0.2.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.9 | 9.191 | +8.66 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 13.1% | -0.092 | -1.21 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 39.2% | -0.005 | -0.20 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.12 | 33.786 | +37.84 |
| Processing: Raw | yes | -0.054 | -0.05 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.9 | 9.191 | +8.66 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 13.1% | -0.092 | -1.21 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 39.2% | -0.005 | -0.20 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.012 | +0.00 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.12 | 33.786 | +37.84 |
| Processing: Raw | yes | -0.054 | -0.05 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -1.74
- Subtotal
- 60.5
- Final score
- 60/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 14.5 | 47.1 (band 23.084415584415588 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 11 | 35.7 (band 7.053571428571431 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 0.7 | 2.3 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 93.6 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 158 | 513 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 69.2% from the food type.
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Additives declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · strong — 4 checkable claims: 4 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "All-Natural, Complete & Balanced, High-Protein, Grain-Free Diet" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
- "High-Protein" — supported by the declared high protein data.
- "Complete and Balanced line of products are formulated to meet AAFCO Standards" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
- "Grain-Free" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
4 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Strong: at least three checkable claims, all consistent with the declared label, and no compliance cap.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| All-Natural, Complete & Balanced, High-Protein, Grain-Free Diet (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| High-Protein (on page) | High/low level | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Minimally processed (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| No synthetic vitamin/mineral powders. All nutrition comes from real food (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Complete and Balanced line of products are formulated to meet AAFCO Standards (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| No fillers- no corn, wheat, soy, rice, potatoes, beans, peas (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Grain-Free (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Only premium ingredients from USA or Canada (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Salty Dog Senior Complete Recipe
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.