Our verdict
Is Raw Dynamic Pet Food Lamb Formula For Dogs a good dog food?
We score it 59/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids lamb: the label lists lamb hearts
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists fish oil
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (13)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- veg 45.4%
- meat 19.6%
- supplement 18.5%
- mineral 9.2%
- oil 7.3%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lamb Hearts | Lamb Hearts | meat · good | - | 10.0 |
| 2 | Lamb Livers | Liver | meat · good | - | 9.6 |
| 3 | Lamb Bone | Bone | mineral · medium | - | 9.2 |
| 4 | Organic Carrots | Carrots | veg · good | - | 8.8 |
| 5 | Organic Beets | Beetroot | veg · good | - | 8.5 |
| 6 | Organic Spinach | Spinach | veg · good | - | 8.1 |
| 7 | Organic Cranberries | Cranberries | veg · good | - | 7.7 |
| 8 | Fish Oil | Fish Oil | oil · good | - | 7.3 |
| 9 | Dried Organic Kelp | Organic Kelp | supplement · good | - | 6.9 |
| 10 | Organic Flaxseeds | Linseed | veg · good | - | 6.5 |
| 11 | Vitamin E Supplement | Vitamin E | supplement · good | - | 6.2 |
| 12 | Rosemary Extract | Rosemary | veg · good | - | 5.8 |
| 13 | Dried Bacillus Coagulans Fermentation Product | Dried Bacillus coagulans fermentation product | supplement · good | - | 5.4 |
- 1. Lamb Hearts10.0% estimated
- 2. Lamb Livers9.6% estimated
- 3. Lamb Bone9.2% estimated
- 4. Organic Carrots8.8% estimated
- 5. Organic Beets8.5% estimated
- 6. Organic Spinach8.1% estimated
- 7. Organic Cranberries7.7% estimated
- 8. Fish Oil7.3% estimated
- 9. Dried Organic Kelp6.9% estimated
- 10. Organic Flaxseeds6.5% estimated
- 11. Vitamin E Supplement6.2% estimated
- 12. Rosemary Extract5.8% estimated
- 13. Dried Bacillus Coagulans Fermentation Product5.4% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 13% · Fat 9%
Guaranteed analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed | Dry matter | Directory average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 13% | 48.15% | - |
| Fat | 9% | 33.33% | - |
| Fibre | 1.50% | 5.56% | - |
| Ash | - | 7.41% | - |
| Moisture | 73% | - | - |
| Carbohydrates | - | 5.56% | - |
Energy: 151 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Keep product frozen and sealed. Thaw out the desired amount for at least 15 minutes, depending on room temperature, or thaw a daily portion overnight in a closed container in the refrigerator. Discard leftovers if not consumed within 30 minutes.
Feeding guide
Measure with a standard measuring cup (each cup holds approximately 4oz when frozen). Suggested feeding amounts may vary 50% based on activity level, age, metabolism and other factors. Use the feeding calculator on the website for personalised amounts.
Additives declared on the label
Technological additives
Organic Rosemary Extract
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19
Brand and contact: Raw Dynamic Pet Food
- Website
- https://rawdynamicpets.com/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- rawdynamicpets.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 4.7/5 · 72 reviews
5 reviews on this product · 5.0/5
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The score is 59 out of 100. Undeclared ingredient shares, meaning ingredients without printed percentages, contributed -10.6. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +7.7, and the processing format contributed -2.4. Being labelled nutritionally complete contributed +2.3.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.74 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 14.4% | -0.092 | -1.33 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 23.3% | -0.005 | -0.12 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 33.8% | -0.012 | -0.41 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.74 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 14.4% | -0.092 | -1.33 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 23.3% | -0.005 | -0.12 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 33.8% | -0.012 | -0.41 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -1.74
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 59.4
- Final score
- 59/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 13 | 46.4 (band 24.267857142857146 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 9 | 32.1 (band 7.415178571428572 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 1.5 | 5.4 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 151 | 539.3 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 72% from the food type.
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 2 checkable claims: 2 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "formulated to meet the nutritional levels established by the AAFCO Dog Food Nutrient Profiles for All Life Stages, including growth of large-size dogs (70Ibs or more as an adult)" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
- "This complete and balanced frozen diet is designed to be left in the freezer until you're ready to feed your dog." — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
6 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Responsibly Sourced (on page) | provenance | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Organic Produce (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Grass Fed & Finished Meats (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| formulated to meet the nutritional levels established by the AAFCO Dog Food Nutrient Profiles for All Life Stages, including growth of large-size dogs (70Ibs or more as an adult) (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| This complete and balanced frozen diet is designed to be left in the freezer until you're ready to feed your dog. (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Humanely Raised Animals (on page) | provenance | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Quality Probiotics & Prebiotics (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Antibiotic & Hormone Free (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Lamb Formula For Dogs
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.