Our verdict
Is Raw Dynamic Pet Food Beef Formula a good dog food?
We score it 70/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids beef: the label lists beef hearts
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists fish oil
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (15)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- veg 42.0%
- meat 17.1%
- supplement 15.1%
- additive 12.2%
- mineral 7.5%
- oil 6.1%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beef Hearts | Beef Hearts | meat · good | - | 8.7 |
| 2 | Beef Livers | Beef Liver | meat · good | - | 8.4 |
| 3 | Organic Carrots | Carrots | veg · good | - | 8.1 |
| 4 | Organic Beets | Beetroot | veg · good | - | 7.8 |
| 5 | Beef Bone | Bone | mineral · medium | - | 7.5 |
| 6 | Organic Cranberries | Cranberries | veg · good | - | 7.2 |
| 7 | Organic Spinach | Spinach | veg · good | - | 7.0 |
| 8 | Organic Sunflower Seeds | Sunflower Seeds | veg · good | - | 6.7 |
| 9 | Organic Apple Cider Vinegar | Apple Cider Vinegar | additive · medium | - | 6.4 |
| 10 | Fish Oil | Fish Oil | oil · good | - | 6.1 |
| 11 | Montmorillonite Clay | Clay | additive · medium | - | 5.8 |
| 12 | Dried Organic Kelp | Organic Kelp | supplement · good | - | 5.5 |
| 13 | Organic Rosemary Extract | Rosemary | veg · good | - | 5.2 |
| 14 | Vitamin E | Vitamin E | supplement · good | - | 4.9 |
| 15 | Dried Bacillus coagulans Fermentation Product | Dried Bacillus coagulans fermentation product | supplement · good | - | 4.6 |
- 1. Beef Hearts8.7% estimated
- 2. Beef Livers8.4% estimated
- 3. Organic Carrots8.1% estimated
- 4. Organic Beets7.8% estimated
- 5. Beef Bone7.5% estimated
- 6. Organic Cranberries7.2% estimated
- 7. Organic Spinach7.0% estimated
- 8. Organic Sunflower Seeds6.7% estimated
- 9. Organic Apple Cider Vinegar6.4% estimated
- 10. Fish Oil6.1% estimated
- 11. Montmorillonite Clay5.8% estimated
- 12. Dried Organic Kelp5.5% estimated
- 13. Organic Rosemary Extract5.2% estimated
- 14. Vitamin E4.9% estimated
- 15. Dried Bacillus coagulans Fermentation Product4.6% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 47% · Fat 34%
Guaranteed analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 47% |
| Fat | 34% |
| Fibre | 3% |
| Moisture | 6% |
Energy: 189 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Measure the desired amount with a standard measuring cup. Rehydrate by adding 1/2 cup of warm water per 1 cup of freeze-dried food. For quicker rehydration, crumble freeze-dried food before adding water. Once hydrated, food will maintain its freshness for 3 days under refrigeration. Fresh water should be available if fed dry.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin E
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19
Brand and contact: Raw Dynamic Pet Food
- Website
- https://rawdynamicpets.com/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- rawdynamicpets.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 4.7/5 · 72 reviews
7 reviews on this product · 5.0/5
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The score for this food is 70 out of 100. Ingredients without printed percentages contributed -10.6 points, which pulled the score down. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +7.2 points, and the processing format contributed +6.6 points. The additives in the recipe contributed +3.3 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.16 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 11.1% | -0.092 | -1.03 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 20.9% | -0.005 | -0.11 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 20.3% | 0.163 | +3.30 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 25.6% | -0.012 | -0.31 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -14.61 | 0.222 | -3.24 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.11 | 33.786 | +37.50 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | yes | 6.629 | +6.63 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.16 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 11.1% | -0.092 | -1.03 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 20.9% | -0.005 | -0.11 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 20.3% | 0.163 | +3.30 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 25.6% | -0.012 | -0.31 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -14.61 | 0.222 | -3.24 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.11 | 33.786 | +37.50 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | yes | 6.629 | +6.63 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.06
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 70.4
- Final score
- 70/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 47 | 50 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 34 | 36.2 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 3 | 3.2 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 189 | 201.1 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 6% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 1 nutritional additive on the label
- Vitamin E
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| cube shaped bites rehydrate quickly with water (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Quality Probiotics & Prebiotics (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Humanely Raised Animals (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| beneficial vitamins and probiotics (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| raw, grass-fed beef (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| organic produce (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Grass Fed & Finished Meats (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Responsibly Sourced (on pack) | provenance | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Antibiotic & Hormone Free (on pack) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Beef Formula
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.