Wynn Petfood Insekt mit Süßkartoffel und Apfel
Fresh Shelf · completeClear label
Our verdict
Is Wynn Petfood Insekt mit Süßkartoffel und Apfel a good dog food?
We score it 64/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Single named protein: insect
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (15)12% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- veg 38.9%
- unknown 28.0%
- carb 25.0%
- mineral 2.5%
- other 2.3%
- fibre 1.9%
- oil 1.3%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28% Insects | Insects | meat · good | 28 | 28.0 |
| 2 | 25% Sweet Potato | Sweet Potatoes | carb · good | 25 | 25.0 |
| 3 | 21% Pea | Peas | veg · good | 21 | 21.0 |
| 4 | 4% Carrot | Carrots | veg · good | 4 | 4.0 |
| 5 | 4% Apple | Apples | veg · good | 4 | 4.0 |
| 6 | 4% Coconut | Coconut | veg · good | 4 | 4.0 |
| 7 | 0.67% Linseed Oil | Linseed oil | oil · good | 0.67 | 0.7 |
| 8 | 0.67% Black Cumin Oil | Black Cumin Oil | oil · good | 0.67 | 0.7 |
| 9 | 0.67% Milk Thistle Oil | Thistle oil | oil · good | 0.67 | 0.7 |
| 10 | Algae Lime | Algae Lime | mineral · medium | - | 2.5 |
| 11 | Vegetable Broth | Vegetable Broth | other · medium | - | 2.3 |
| 12 | Seaweed | Seaweed | veg · good | - | 2.1 |
| 13 | Psyllium Husks | Psyllium | fibre · good | - | 1.9 |
| 14 | Chicory | Chicory | veg · good | - | 1.7 |
| 15 | Wild Herbs | Wild Herbs | veg · good | - | 1.5 |
- 1. 28% Insects28% declared28.0% estimated
- 2. 25% Sweet Potato25% declared25.0% estimated
- 3. 21% Pea21% declared21.0% estimated
- 4. 4% Carrot4% declared4.0% estimated
- 5. 4% Apple4% declared4.0% estimated
- 6. 4% Coconut4% declared4.0% estimated
- 7. 0.67% Linseed Oil0.67% declared0.7% estimated
- 8. 0.67% Black Cumin Oil0.67% declared0.7% estimated
- 9. 0.67% Milk Thistle Oil0.67% declared0.7% estimated
- 10. Algae Lime2.5% estimated
- 11. Vegetable Broth2.3% estimated
- 12. Seaweed2.1% estimated
- 13. Psyllium Husks1.9% estimated
- 14. Chicory1.7% estimated
- 15. Wild Herbs1.5% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 24% · Fat 10%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 24% |
| Fat | 10% |
| Fibre | 4.90% |
| Ash | 8% |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Offene Tüten ungekühlt bei Raumtemperatur lagerbar; zubereitete Mahlzeit frisch servieren
Feeding guide
Papiertüte aufreißen, gewünschte Menge in den Napf geben, 2- bis 3-fache Menge warmes Wasser zugeben, umrühren und 5-10 Minuten einweichen lassen. Individuelle Ration über Wynn Rationsrechner berechnen.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
12000 I.E. Vitamin A; 1200 I.E. Vitamin D3; 90 mg Zink (3b606); 5.6 mg Kupfer (3b405)
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19
Brand and contact: Wynn Petfood
- Website
- https://wynn-petfood.de/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- wynn-petfood.de
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This food scores 64 out of 100. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +4.9 points, and being labelled nutritionally complete added +2.3 points. On the other hand, the carbohydrate content took away -2.2 points, and ingredients without printed percentages cost a further -1.3 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.88 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 18.8% | -0.115 | -2.17 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 4.0% | -0.092 | -0.37 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 22.3% | -0.005 | -0.12 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.3% | -0.375 | -0.13 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 42.2% | -0.027 | -1.12 |
| Undeclared quantities | 12.0% | -0.106 | -1.27 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.88 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 18.8% | -0.115 | -2.17 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 4.0% | -0.092 | -0.37 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 22.3% | -0.005 | -0.12 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.012 | +0.00 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.3% | -0.375 | -0.13 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 42.2% | -0.027 | -1.12 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 12.0% | -0.106 | -1.27 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 63.8
- Final score
- 64/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 24 | 96 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 10 | 40 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 4.9 | 19.6 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 0 |
Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 75% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 4 nutritional additives on the label
- 12000 I.E. Vitamin A
- 1200 I.E. Vitamin D3
- 90 mg Zink (3b606)
- 5.6 mg Kupfer (3b405)
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (88% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 17.6/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) | 5/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 2 checkable claims: 2 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "Monoprotein" — supported by the declared single protein data.
- "Ohne Getreide" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
10 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| hypoallergenes Nassfutter (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| besonders auch für empfindliche Hunde und Allergiker geeignet (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| wissenschaftlich optimiertes Omega-3 zu Omega-6-Verhältnis für das Immunsystem & die Fellgesundheit (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Monoprotein (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Extra-sensitiv (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| -31% CO₂ Produktion (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| -55% CO₂ Zutaten (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| ohne Konservierungsstoffe, Zucker, Getreide & Geschmacksverstärker (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Ohne Getreide (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| -75% CO₂ Versand (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| -87% CO₂ Verpackung (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Einzigartiger Gehalt an natürlichen Nährstoffen durch Gefriertrocknung (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Insekt mit Süßkartoffel und Apfel
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.