Vet-Concept Young Pack Mini

Dry Extruded · complete

Poor
our rating

Our verdict

Is Vet-Concept Young Pack Mini a good dog food?

We score it 30/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".

How we score

100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • Nutritionally complete: formulated to be fed as the whole diet.

Why you might not

  • 4 poor-graded ingredients make up about 44% of the recipe.
  • No analytical breakdown is published.
  • 100% of the recipe mass has no printed percentage, so the exact split cannot be verified.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for puppies
  • Labelling or feeding guide is aimed at small dogs
  • Doesn't list beef, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids chicken: it is listed as an ingredient
  • Your dog avoids turkey: it is listed as an ingredient
  • Your dog avoids grain: the label lists cereals
  • You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Ingredients (12)100% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • veg 22.4%
  • meat 20.8%
  • supplement 18.3%
  • carb 11.2%
  • oil 10.7%
  • other 10.2%
  • unknown 6.4%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1Meat and Animal Derivatives (Poultry Meal)Meat and Animal Derivativesmeat · poor-10.8
2Cereals (Maize, Rice)Cerealscarb · poor-10.4
3Oils and FatsOils and Fatsoil · poor-9.9
4Vegetable Derivatives (Dried Beet Pulp)Vegetable By-Productsother · poor-9.5
5MineralsVitamins and mineralssupplement · medium-9.0
6Eggs and Egg Derivatives (Whole Egg Powder)Eggmeat · good-8.6
7YeastYeastsupplement · good-8.1
8Algae (Ascophyllum nodosum)Seaweedveg · good-7.7
9Seeds (Linseed)Seedsveg · poor-7.2
10HerbsHerbsveg · medium-6.8
11Yeast ExtractHydrolysed Yeastadditive · medium-6.3
12GreenGreen Teaveg · good-5.9
  1. 1. Meat and Animal Derivatives (Poultry Meal)10.8% estimated
  2. 2. Cereals (Maize, Rice)10.4% estimated
    Cereals · carb · poor
  3. 3. Oils and Fats9.9% estimated
    Oils and Fats · oil · poor
  4. 4. Vegetable Derivatives (Dried Beet Pulp)9.5% estimated
    Vegetable By-Products · other · poor
  5. 5. Minerals9.0% estimated
    Vitamins and minerals · supplement · medium
  6. 6. Eggs and Egg Derivatives (Whole Egg Powder)8.6% estimated
    Egg · meat · good
  7. 7. Yeast8.1% estimated
    Yeast · supplement · good
  8. 8. Algae (Ascophyllum nodosum)7.7% estimated
    Seaweed · veg · good
  9. 9. Seeds (Linseed)7.2% estimated
    Seeds · veg · poor
  10. 10. Herbs6.8% estimated
    Herbs · veg · medium
  11. 11. Yeast Extract6.3% estimated
    Hydrolysed Yeast · additive · medium
  12. 12. Green5.9% estimated
    Green Tea · veg · good

Nutrition and feeding

Typical analysis (as fed)

No analysis recorded yet.

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Feeding guide

YOUNG PACK MINI eignet sich eingeweicht zur Beifütterung ab der 4. Lebenswoche. Nach der 6. Lebenswoche können die Kroketten zur alleinigen Fütterung trocken angeboten werden. Für kleine Hunde (Adultgewicht bis 10 kg) bis zur Vollendung des 12. Monats, bei höherem Adultgewicht bis zum Ende des 4. Lebensmonats.

No additives recorded yet.

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19

Brand and contact: Vet-Concept

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-19
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.

Trustpilot: 0.0/5 · 0 reviews

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

The product reached an overall score of 30 out of 100. It lost points for ingredients without printed percentages, which contributed -10.5, and the processing format contributed -6.7. Lower-quality ingredients contributed -2.8, and the remaining ingredients contributed -2.6.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.19.191+0.60
Carb share of dry matter13.7%-0.115-1.57
Oil share of dry matter14.7%-0.092-1.35
Vegetable share of dry matter20.8%-0.005-0.11
Supplement share of dry matter23.3%-0.012-0.28
Other share of dry matter7.0%-0.375-2.64
Unrecognised share of dry matter4.4%-0.027-0.12
Recipe graded poor43.8%-0.065-2.85
Poor-quality meat in recipe11.8%-0.179-2.10
Number of poor ingredients4-0.876-3.50
Largest single poor ingredient11.8%0.060+0.71
Undeclared quantities99.9%-0.106-10.55
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
Additive penalty-0.940.222-0.21
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.19.191+0.60
Meat share of dry matter0.0%0.096+0.00
Carb share of dry matter13.7%-0.115-1.57
Oil share of dry matter14.7%-0.092-1.35
Vegetable share of dry matter20.8%-0.005-0.11
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter23.3%-0.012-0.28
Other share of dry matter7.0%-0.375-2.64
Unrecognised share of dry matter4.4%-0.027-0.12
Recipe graded poor43.8%-0.065-2.85
Poor-quality meat in recipe11.8%-0.179-2.10
Number of poor ingredients4-0.876-3.50
Largest single poor ingredient11.8%0.060+0.71
Undeclared quantities99.9%-0.106-10.55
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietno2.294+0.00
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no0.707+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty-0.940.222-0.21
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
+0.02
Subtotal
30.2
Final score
30/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

Analytical constituents not declared

No nutritional additives section declared on the label.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✗ Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file0/20
✗ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file0/15
✗ Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file0/10
✗ Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

Claims on file; none we can check against the label

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
Die Kroketten fördern durch Form und Struktur die Kautätigkeit und den Zahnpflege-Effekt (on pack)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Aufrechterhaltung der Gelenkgesundheit (on pack)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
angepasste Gehalte an essenziellen Fettsäuren (on pack)Nutrientnot checkableManufacturer assertion
ausgewogenes Calcium-Phosphor-Verhältnis (on pack)Nutrientnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Premium Trockenfutter für Welpen und Junghunde ab der 4. Lebenswoche (on pack)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
leicht verdauliches tierisches Protein (on pack)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Alleinfuttermittel für Welpen und Junghunde (on pack)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to Young Pack Mini

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Vet-Concept

Community0 comments

Owners’ verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.