Vet-Concept Salmon Pack

Dry Extruded · completeClear label

Poor
our rating

Our verdict

Is Vet-Concept Salmon Pack a good dog food?

We score it 30/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".

How we score

Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.

70% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
  • Single named animal protein: fish.
  • Doesn't list grain ingredients.

Why you might not

  • 3 poor-graded ingredients make up about 65% of the recipe.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
  • Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
  • Single named protein: fish
  • Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Ingredients (7)70% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • meat 30.0%
  • carb 21.5%
  • oil 18.8%
  • other 16.1%
  • supplement 13.6%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1Vegetables (Potato)Vegetablesveg · medium-17.5
2Fish and fish by-products (Salmon meal) (30%)Fish And Fish By-Productsmeat · poor3030.0
3Oils and fatsOils and Fatsoil · poor-15.7
4Vegetable by-products (Dried beet pulp)Vegetable By-Productsother · poor-14.0
5MineralsVitamins and mineralssupplement · medium-12.2
6Yeast extractHydrolysed Yeastadditive · medium-10.5
7Green-lipped mussel (Perna canaliculus) (0.05%)Green-Lipped Musselsupplement · good0.050.05
  1. 1. Vegetables (Potato)17.5% estimated
    Vegetables · veg · medium
  2. 2. Fish and fish by-products (Salmon meal) (30%)30% declared30.0% estimated
  3. 3. Oils and fats15.7% estimated
    Oils and Fats · oil · poor
  4. 4. Vegetable by-products (Dried beet pulp)14.0% estimated
    Vegetable By-Products · other · poor
  5. 5. Minerals12.2% estimated
    Vitamins and minerals · supplement · medium
  6. 6. Yeast extract10.5% estimated
    Hydrolysed Yeast · additive · medium
  7. 7. Green-lipped mussel (Perna canaliculus) (0.05%)0.05% declared0.05% estimated
    Green-Lipped Mussel · supplement · good

Nutrition and feedingProtein 21.80% · Fat 9.80%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein21.80%
Fat9.80%
Fibre2.20%
Ash6.50%
Omega-3 fatty acids0.45%
Omega-6 fatty acids2.20%
Calcium1.20%
Phosphorus0.85%
Sodium0.35%

Energy: 358 kcal/100g

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Feeding guide

Fütterungsempfehlung für adulte Hunde pro Tag: bei den in Gramm angegebenen Mengen handelt es sich um Durchschnittswerte, abhängig von Alter, Rasse und Aktivität des Tieres. Wasser zur freien Aufnahme anbieten.

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

Vitamin A 12.000 IE; Vitamin D3 1.200 IE; Vitamin E (all rac-alpha-Tocopherylacetat) 120 mg; Taurin 1.000 mg; Eisen (Eisen(II)-sulfat-Monohydrat) 90 mg; Zink (Zinkoxid, Aminosäuren-Zinkchelat, Hydrat) 100 mg; Kupfer (Kupfer(II)-sulfat-Pentahydrat) 10 mg; Mangan (Mangan(II)-oxid) 15 mg; Jod (Kalziumjodat, wasserfrei) 2 mg; Selen (Natriumselenit) 0,16 mg

Technological additives

Antioxidationsmittel natürlichen Ursprungs

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19

Brand and contact: Vet-Concept

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-19
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.

Trustpilot: 0.0/5 · 0 reviews

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

Starting from 30, the score was reduced by several negative factors. Undeclared ingredient shares weighed on the total, costing -7.4 points, while the processing format added a further -6.7. The remaining ingredients pulled the score down by -5.7, and lower-quality meat ingredients contributed -5.4. Taken together, these deductions shape the final result out of 100.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality-0.59.191-4.53
Meat share of dry matter15.9%0.096+1.52
Carb share of dry matter10.1%-0.115-1.17
Oil share of dry matter35.2%-0.092-3.24
Supplement share of dry matter23.6%-0.012-0.29
Other share of dry matter15.2%-0.375-5.70
Recipe graded poor64.9%-0.065-4.22
Poor-quality meat in recipe30.0%-0.179-5.36
Number of poor ingredients3-0.876-2.63
Largest single poor ingredient30.0%0.060+1.80
Undeclared quantities69.8%-0.106-7.38
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality-0.59.191-4.53
Meat share of dry matter15.9%0.096+1.52
Carb share of dry matter10.1%-0.115-1.17
Oil share of dry matter35.2%-0.092-3.24
Vegetable share of dry matter0.0%-0.005+0.00
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter23.6%-0.012-0.29
Other share of dry matter15.2%-0.375-5.70
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor64.9%-0.065-4.22
Poor-quality meat in recipe30.0%-0.179-5.36
Number of poor ingredients3-0.876-2.63
Largest single poor ingredient30.0%0.060+1.80
Undeclared quantities69.8%-0.106-7.38
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no0.707+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)no-3.158+0.00
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty0.000.222+0.00
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
+0.02
Additives declared on label
+2 transparency bonus
Subtotal
30.4
Final score
30/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein21.824.1 (band 18 to 40%)86.6
Fat9.810.8 (band 5.5 to 20%)92
Fibre2.22.4 (band 0.5 to 5%)95.7
Calcium1.21.3 (band 0.5 to 2.5%)94.8
Phosphorus0.850.9 (band 0.4 to 1.6%)97
Sodium0.350.4 (band 0.1+%)100
Calcium:phosphorus ratio1.41.4 (band 1 to 2%)94.7
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3)--100
Energy (kcal/100g)358395.6100

Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.

Scored over 9 declared nutrients (combined weight 105); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.

Declared fortification: 10 nutritional additives on the label
  • Vitamin A 12.000 IE
  • Vitamin D3 1.200 IE
  • Vitamin E (all rac-alpha-Tocopherylacetat) 120 mg
  • Taurin 1.000 mg
  • Eisen (Eisen(II)-sulfat-Monohydrat) 90 mg
  • Zink (Zinkoxid, Aminosäuren-Zinkchelat, Hydrat) 100 mg
  • Kupfer (Kupfer(II)-sulfat-Pentahydrat) 10 mg
  • Mangan (Mangan(II)-oxid) 15 mg
  • Jod (Kalziumjodat, wasserfrei) 2 mg
  • Selen (Natriumselenit) 0,16 mg

Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (30.2% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)6/20
✗ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file0/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)10/10
✓ Energy value declared (voluntary)5/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.

Consistent with the label

  • "Getreidefreie Rezeptur mit Kartoffel" — supported by the declared grain-free data.

8 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.

Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
Hochwertiges Lachseiweiß für beste Verträglichkeit (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Keine Tierversuche (on page)provenancenot checkableManufacturer assertion
SALMON PACK - Hochverdauliche Premiumnahrung für futtersensible Hunde (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Keine Geruchs-, Farb- oder Geschmacksstoffe (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Getreidefreie Rezeptur mit Kartoffel (on page)Free-fromconsistentManufacturer assertion
Reich an Omega-3-Fettsäuren (on page)High/low levelnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Volles Korn, Gemüse und Kartoffeln in Lebensmittelqualität (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Frei von gentechnisch manipulierten Zutaten und chem. Konservierungsstoffen (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Nach Lebensmittelkriterien ausgewählte Fisch- und Fleischmaterialien (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to Salmon Pack

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Vet-Concept

Community0 comments

Owners’ verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.