Vet-Concept Dog Revital
Wet Pate complete High meat Clear label
Is Vet-Concept Dog Revital a good dog food?
We score it 48/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Why this score?
The overall score is 48 out of 100. Undeclared ingredient shares contributed -10.5 and other ingredients contributed -5.3, both pulling the score down. Being labelled nutritionally complete added +2.3, and the overall quality of the ingredient list added +2.
99% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
- Recipe48
- Nutritionalhigh95
- Transparency60
- Safety100
- EvidenceNot recorded
The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.
Why you might choose it
- Meat makes up an estimated 42% of the dry matter (40% as fed).
- Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
- Single named animal protein: chicken.
Why you might not
- Around 43% of the recipe is generic or unspecified ingredients.
- High in fat: 25% fat on a dry-matter basis.
Estimated composition
Typical analysis (as fed)
- Protein
- 12.40%
- Fat
- 6.50%
- Fibre
- 0.30%
- Ash
- 1.80%
- Moisture
- 74%
- Omega-3 fatty acids
- 0.30%
- Omega-6 fatty acids
- 1.25%
- Calcium
- 0.26%
- Phosphorus
- 0.18%
- Sodium
- 0.08%
Energy: 128 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 2.000 IE/kg; Vitamin D3 240 IE/kg; Vitamin E (all rac-alpha-Tocopherylacetat) 36 mg/kg; L-Carnitin 1.000 mg/kg; Taurin 580 mg/kg; Zink (Zinksulfat, Monohydrat) 25 mg/kg; Mangan (Mangan(II)-sulfat, Monohydrat) 2 mg/kg; Kupfer (Kupfer(II)-sulfat-Pentahydrat) 2 mg/kg; Jod (Kalziumjodat, wasserfrei) 0,9 mg/kg
Feeding guide
Sofern nicht anders empfohlen, mehrere kleine Mahlzeiten pro Tag. Wasser zur freien Aufnahme anbieten. Die Verabreichung des Futtermittels mit Hilfe von Schlundsonden bedarf der tierärztlichen Aufsicht. Bei Fütterung mittels Spritze, Nahrung vor dem Einfüllen umrühren und gegebenenfalls mit Trinkwasser verdünnen. Empfohlene Fütterungsdauer: Bis zur vollständigen Genesung.
Reviews
Trustpilot: 0.0/5 · 0 reviews
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Single named protein: chicken
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- You are limiting fat: 25.0% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (8)
| # | As declared | Matched | Category | Tier | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Entenfleisch | unmatched | - | - | - | 24.8 |
| 2 | Hühnerleber | Chicken Liver | meat | good | - | 22.4 |
| 3 | Gemüse (Süßkartoffel) | unmatched | - | - | - | 19.9 |
| 4 | Eier und Eierzeugnisse (Volleipulver) | Dried Whole Egg | meat | good | - | 17.4 |
| 5 | Öle und Fette (Lachsöl) (0.5%) | unmatched | - | - | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 6 | pflanzliche Nebenerzeugnisse (Cellulose) | Vegetable By-Products | other | poor | - | 14.9 |
| 7 | Chicoréewurzel* (Quelle für Inulin) (0.1%) | Inulin | fibre | good | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 8 | Mariendistelsamen (0.05%) | unmatched | - | - | 0.05 | 0.05 |
Brand
- Contact page
- www.vet-concept.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.vet-concept.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Scored with model v3 on 2026-09-26. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.2 | 9.191 | +2.05 |
| Other share of dry matter | 14.2% | -0.375 | -5.33 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 43.2% | -0.027 | -1.14 |
| Recipe graded poor | 14.9% | -0.065 | -0.97 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 14.9% | 0.060 | +0.89 |
| Undeclared quantities | 99.3% | -0.106 | -10.49 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.2 | 9.191 | +2.05 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.005 | +0.00 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.012 | +0.00 |
| Other share of dry matter | 14.2% | -0.375 | -5.33 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 43.2% | -0.027 | -1.14 |
| Recipe graded poor | 14.9% | -0.065 | -0.97 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 14.9% | 0.060 | +0.89 |
| Undeclared quantities | 99.3% | -0.106 | -10.49 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 48.2
- Final score
- 48/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 12.4 | 47.7 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 6.5 | 25 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 0.3 | 1.2 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 78.7 |
| Calcium | 0.26 | 1 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 85 |
| Phosphorus | 0.18 | 0.7 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 84.6 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.4 | 1.4 (band 1 to 2%) | 96.7 |
| Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3) | - | - | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 128 | 492.3 | 100 |
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.
Scored over 8 declared nutrients (combined weight 100); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
High confidence: full analysis plus minerals or omegas and declared energy.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (0.7% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 0.1/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ideal bei geschwächten Hunden und bei mangelndem Appetit (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Die sehr softe Konsistenz erleichtert die Futteraufnahme (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Zur Fütterung per Schlundsonde geeignet (bedarf der tierärztlichen Aufsicht) (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| hoher Proteingehalt zur Unterstützung der Körperkondition und Gewebereparatur (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Essenzielle Fettsäuren fördern in Kombination mit Antioxidantien wie Vitamin E und Silymarin aus der Mariendistel nicht nur den Schutz der Körperzellen vor freien Radikalen und belastenden Stoffwechselendprodukten, sondern auch ein intaktes Immunsystem (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Omega-3-Fettsäuren sind aufgrund ihrer entzündungshemmenden Effekte von großer Bedeutung während der Erholungsphase (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Zur ernährungsphysiologischen Wiederherstellung und in der Rekonvaleszenz (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Keine Tierversuche (on pack) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Nach Lebensmittelkriterien ausgewählte Fisch- und Fleischmaterialien (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Keine Geruchs-, Farb- oder Geschmacksstoffe (on pack) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Volles Korn, Gemüse und Kartoffeln in Lebensmittelqualität (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Leicht verdauliches Futtermittel mit hohem Energiegehalt, hohen Konzentrationen wichtiger Nährstoffe und leichtverdaulichen Ausgangserzeugnissen (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Frei von gentechnisch manipulierten Zutaten und chem. Konservierungsstoffen (on pack) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Other products from Vet-Concept
See all products from Vet-Concept
Alternatives to Dog Revital
Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.
Community
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.