Vet-Concept Dog Intestinal Low Fat
Dry Extruded · completeClear label
Our verdict
Is Vet-Concept Dog Intestinal Low Fat a good dog food?
We score it 45/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
99% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids duck: it is listed as an ingredient
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (10)99% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- carb 29.8%
- unknown 23.9%
- fibre 13.4%
- oil 11.9%
- veg 10.9%
- supplement 10.0%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vegetables (Sweet Potato) | Vegetables | veg · medium | - | 14.2 |
| 2 | Meat and Animal Derivatives (Duck Meal) | Meat and Animal Derivatives | meat · poor | - | 13.4 |
| 3 | Tapioca | Tapioca | carb · medium | - | 12.6 |
| 4 | Cellulose | Cellulose | fibre · medium | - | 11.8 |
| 5 | Oils and Fats | Oils and Fats | oil · poor | - | 11.1 |
| 6 | Seeds (Linseed) | Seeds | veg · poor | - | 10.3 |
| 7 | Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 9.5 |
| 8 | Chicory Root (source of Inulin) (0.5%) | Chicory root | veg · good | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 9 | Yeast Extract | Hydrolysed Yeast | additive · medium | - | 8.7 |
| 10 | easily digestible source materials | unmatched | - | - | 7.9 |
- 1. Vegetables (Sweet Potato)14.2% estimated
- 2. Meat and Animal Derivatives (Duck Meal)13.4% estimated
- 3. Tapioca12.6% estimated
- 4. Cellulose11.8% estimated
- 5. Oils and Fats11.1% estimated
- 6. Seeds (Linseed)10.3% estimated
- 7. Minerals9.5% estimated
- 8. Chicory Root (source of Inulin) (0.5%)0.5% declared0.5% estimated
- 9. Yeast Extract8.7% estimated
- 10. easily digestible source materials7.9% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 24.80% · Fat 5.80%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 24.80% |
| Fat | 5.80% |
| Fibre | 1.90% |
| Ash | 7.50% |
| Omega-3 fatty acids | 0.40% |
| Calcium | 1.25% |
| Phosphorus | 0.90% |
| Sodium | 0.45% |
Energy: 338 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Fütterungsempfehlung für adulte Hunde pro Tag: Zunächst bis zu 12 Wochen, bei chronischer Insuffizienz der Bauchspeicheldrüse lebenslang. Es wird empfohlen, vor der Verwendung den Rat eines Tierarztes einzuholen. Wasser zur freien Aufnahme anbieten.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 14.000 IE; Vitamin D3 1.250 IE; Vitamin E (all rac-alpha-Tocopherylacetat) 150 mg; Vitamin B12 110 mcg; Taurin 1.000 mg; L-Carnitin 1.000 mg; Zink (Zinkoxid, Aminosäure-Zinkchelat, Hydrat) 100 mg; Kupfer (Kupfer(II)sulfat, Pentahydrat) 10 mg; Mangan (Mangan(II)oxid) 15 mg; Jod (Kalziumjodat, wasserfrei) 2 mg; Selen (Natriumselenit) 0,16 mg; DL-Methionin 1.000 mg
Technological additives
Bentonit 2.500 mg; Antioxidationsmittel natürlichen Ursprungs
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19
Brand and contact: Vet-Concept
- Contact page
- www.vet-concept.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.vet-concept.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 0.0/5 · 0 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The overall score is 45 out of 100. Undeclared ingredient shares, meaning ingredients without printed percentages, had a negative effect of -10.5 points. The processing format contributed -6.7 points against the score. On the positive side, being labelled nutritionally complete added +2.3 points, and the overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +2.2 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.2 | 9.191 | +2.15 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 12.0% | -0.115 | -1.38 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 18.9% | -0.092 | -1.74 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 15.8% | -0.005 | -0.08 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 14.8% | -0.012 | -0.18 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 19.1% | -0.027 | -0.51 |
| Recipe graded poor | 11.9% | -0.065 | -0.78 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 11.9% | 0.060 | +0.72 |
| Undeclared quantities | 99.4% | -0.106 | -10.49 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.2 | 9.191 | +2.15 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 12.0% | -0.115 | -1.38 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 18.9% | -0.092 | -1.74 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 15.8% | -0.005 | -0.08 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 14.8% | -0.012 | -0.18 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 19.1% | -0.027 | -0.51 |
| Recipe graded poor | 11.9% | -0.065 | -0.78 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 11.9% | 0.060 | +0.72 |
| Undeclared quantities | 99.4% | -0.106 | -10.49 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 45.3
- Final score
- 45/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 24.8 | 27.4 (band 18 to 40%) | 95.6 |
| Fat | 5.8 | 6.4 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 73.8 |
| Fibre | 1.9 | 2.1 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 91.3 |
| Calcium | 1.25 | 1.4 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 96.4 |
| Phosphorus | 0.9 | 1 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 99.7 |
| Sodium | 0.45 | 0.5 (band 0.1+%) | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.4 | 1.4 (band 1 to 2%) | 93.3 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 338 | 373.5 | 100 |
Scored over 8 declared nutrients (combined weight 95); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 12 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A 14.000 IE
- Vitamin D3 1.250 IE
- Vitamin E (all rac-alpha-Tocopherylacetat) 150 mg
- Vitamin B12 110 mcg
- Taurin 1.000 mg
- L-Carnitin 1.000 mg
- Zink (Zinkoxid, Aminosäure-Zinkchelat, Hydrat) 100 mg
- Kupfer (Kupfer(II)sulfat, Pentahydrat) 10 mg
- Mangan (Mangan(II)oxid) 15 mg
- Jod (Kalziumjodat, wasserfrei) 2 mg
- Selen (Natriumselenit) 0,16 mg
- DL-Methionin 1.000 mg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (0.6% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 0.1/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fettreduzierte Schonkost bei Resorptionsstörungen & unzureichender Verdauung (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Eine hohe Verdaulichkeit der Nährstoffe fördert die Nährstoffaufnahme und Genesungsphase (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Diätetische Faserstoffe mildern Durchfall und unterstützen die Normalisierung der Darmflora (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Für ernährungssensible Hunde geeignet (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Keine Tierversuche (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Volles Korn, Gemüse und Kartoffeln in Lebensmittelqualität (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Nach Lebensmittelkriterien ausgewählte Fisch- und Fleischmaterialien (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Diät-Alleinfuttermittel für adulte Hunde zum Ausgleich bei unzureichender Verdauung und zur Linderung von Resorptionsstörungen des Darms (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Keine Geruchs-, Farb- oder Geschmacksstoffe (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Frei von gentechnisch manipulierten Zutaten und chem. Konservierungsstoffen (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Leichtverdauliche Nahrung mit niedrigen Fett- und Faseranteilen sowie erhöhtem Elektrolytgehalt (Natrium, Kalium) (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Dog Intestinal Low Fat
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.