Ritzenberger Tiernahrung Ente Fleischtopf Sensitiv
Wet Chunks complete Clear label
Is Ritzenberger Tiernahrung Ente Fleischtopf Sensitiv a good dog food?
We score it 67/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Why this score?
The overall score for this recipe is 67 out of 100. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +2.4 points, while being labelled nutritionally complete added +2.3 points. The meat content also had a positive effect, contributing +2.2 points. On the downside, ingredients without printed percentages dragged the score down by -2.1 points.
- Recipe67
- Nutritionalmedium98
- Transparency60
- Safety100
- Evidencemoderate100
The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.
Why you might choose it
- Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
- Single named animal protein: duck.
- Doesn't list grain ingredients.
Why you might not
- Around 58% of the recipe is generic or unspecified ingredients.
- High in fat: 38% fat on a dry-matter basis.
Estimated composition
Typical analysis (as fed)
- Protein
- 11.50%
- Fat
- 8.50%
- Fibre
- 0.40%
- Ash
- 1.30%
- Moisture
- 77.50%
Energy: 125 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Nutritional additives
Vitamin D3 (200 I.E./kg)
Storage
Mindestens 12 Monate ohne Kühlung haltbar, nach dem Öffnen gekühlt lagern und innerhalb von 3-4 Tage verbrauchen.
Feeding guide
Täglich empfohlene Fütterungsmenge an Nassfutter für aktive und erwachsene Hunde: <5kg 200-250g; 5-9kg 250-400g; 10-19kg 450-650g; 20-29kg 700-900g; 30-40kg 950-1200g. Bei Verwendung als Welpenfutter bis zum 7. Lebensmonat Zufütterung einer Kalziumergänzung empfohlen. Auf mindestens zwei Mahlzeiten verteilt bei Raumtemperatur servieren.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Single named protein: duck
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- You are limiting fat: 37.8% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (8)
| # | As declared | Matched | Category | Tier | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Duck Meat (45%) | Duck | meat | medium | 45 | 45.0 |
| 2 | Duck Offal | Offal | meat | medium | - | 4.2 |
| 3 | 35% - Stomach | Stomach | meat | medium | 35 | 35.0 |
| 4 | Heart | Heart | meat | good | - | 3.9 |
| 5 | Duck Necks | Fresh Duck Necks | meat | good | - | 3.5 |
| 6 | Broth | Cooking broth | other | medium | - | 3.2 |
| 7 | Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement | medium | - | 2.8 |
| 8 | Linseed Oil | Linseed oil | oil | good | - | 2.5 |
Brand
- Website
- https://www.ritzenberger.de/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.ritzenberger.de
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Scored with model v3 on 2026-09-26. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.3 | 9.191 | +2.38 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 23.1% | 0.096 | +2.22 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 7.0% | -0.092 | -0.65 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 7.6% | -0.012 | -0.09 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.5% | -0.375 | -0.18 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 58.5% | -0.027 | -1.55 |
| Undeclared quantities | 20.0% | -0.106 | -2.11 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.3 | 9.191 | +2.38 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 23.1% | 0.096 | +2.22 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 7.0% | -0.092 | -0.65 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.005 | +0.00 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 7.6% | -0.012 | -0.09 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.5% | -0.375 | -0.18 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 58.5% | -0.027 | -1.55 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 20.0% | -0.106 | -2.11 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 67.3
- Final score
- 67/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 11.5 | 51.1 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 8.5 | 37.8 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 0.4 | 1.8 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 87 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 125 | 555.6 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (80% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 16/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "Single-Protein" — supported by the declared single protein data.
5 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| hypoallergenes Nassfutter (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| leicht verdauliche Fleischtopf (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| genau richtig bei Hunden mit Allergien (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Single-Protein (on pack) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100% Naturprodukt (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Vet-Nahrung (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Other products from Ritzenberger Tiernahrung
See all products from Ritzenberger Tiernahrung
Alternatives to Ente Fleischtopf Sensitiv
Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.
Community
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.