Manufaktur für gesundes Hundefutter Premium Welpenmenue mit Huhn
Wet Chunks · completeHigh meatClear label
Our verdict
Is Manufaktur für gesundes Hundefutter Premium Welpenmenue mit Huhn a good dog food?
We score it 75/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Declared analysis sits below the FEDIAF minimum for fat.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for puppies
- Single named protein: chicken
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists pearled barley
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (7)6 of 7 percentages printed
Estimated composition
- meat 60.0%
- veg 20.0%
- carb 15.0%
- other 5.0%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60% Chicken Muscle Meat | Chicken Muscle Meat | meat · good | 60 | 60.0 |
| 2 | 6.67% Carrots | Carrots | veg · good | 6.67 | 6.7 |
| 3 | 6.67% Courgette | Courgette | veg · good | 6.67 | 6.7 |
| 4 | 6.67% Celeriac and Fennel | Celery Root and Fennel | veg · good | 6.67 | 6.7 |
| 5 | 15% Pearl Barley | Pearled Barley | carb · medium | 15 | 15.0 |
| 6 | 5% Drinking Water | Water | other | 5 | 5.0 |
| 7 | Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 0.0 |
- 1. 60% Chicken Muscle Meat60% declared60.0% estimated
- 2. 6.67% Carrots6.67% declared6.7% estimated
- 3. 6.67% Courgette6.67% declared6.7% estimated
- 4. 6.67% Celeriac and Fennel6.67% declared6.7% estimated
- 5. 15% Pearl Barley15% declared15.0% estimated
- 6. 5% Drinking Water5% declared5.0% estimated
- 7. Minerals0.0% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 14.60% · Fat 1%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 14.60% |
| Fat | 1% |
| Fibre | 0.30% |
| Ash | 2.70% |
| Moisture | 77.30% |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Angebrochene Menues im Kühlschrank lagern und innerhalb von 2-3 Tagen aufbrauchen. Ungeöffnete Futtergläser sind bei kühler und dunkler Lagerung bis zu 18 Monate haltbar.
Feeding guide
Für Welpen ca. 50 g je kg aktuelles Körpergewicht täglich (z.B. 2 kg ≈ 100 g, 10 kg ≈ 500 g, 20 kg ≈ 1 kg, 30 kg ≈ 1,5 kg); langsame Futterumstellung über 3-5 Tage empfohlen.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 1000 IE (3a672a); Vitamin D3 100 IE (3a671); Vitamin E 10 mg (3a700i); Kupfer 1,0 mg (3b405); Jod 0,8 mg (3a201); Mangan 2,0 mg (3b503)
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19
Brand and contact: Manufaktur für gesundes Hundefutter
- Website
- https://fordogsonly.de/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- fordogsonly.de
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 5.0/5 · 63 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This product scored 75 out of 100. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +7.3 points, while the meat content contributed +4.9 points. The carbohydrate content reduced the score by -4.6 points, and being labelled nutritionally complete contributed +2.3 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.30 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 50.5% | 0.096 | +4.85 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 39.7% | -0.115 | -4.57 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 9.0% | -0.005 | -0.05 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.8% | -0.375 | -0.28 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.30 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 50.5% | 0.096 | +4.85 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 39.7% | -0.115 | -4.57 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 9.0% | -0.005 | -0.05 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.012 | +0.00 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.8% | -0.375 | -0.28 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 0.0% | -0.106 | +0.00 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 75.2
- Final score
- 75/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for puppies and growth. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Scored against FEDIAF growth minima; puppy scoring is under review.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 14.6 | 64.3 | 100 |
| Fat | 1 | 4.4 | 36.3 |
Scored over 2 declared nutrients (combined weight 40); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 6 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A 1000 IE (3a672a)
- Vitamin D3 100 IE (3a671)
- Vitamin E 10 mg (3a700i)
- Kupfer 1,0 mg (3b405)
- Jod 0,8 mg (3a201)
- Mangan 2,0 mg (3b503)
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (100% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 20/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) | 5/5 |
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| vollwertiges, bedarfsdeckendes Menue für Ihren heranwachsenden Hund (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| ohne tierische Nebenprodukte (on pack) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Calcium und Jod sind bedarfsgerecht ergänzt (on pack) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 60% Muskelfleisch vom Huhn (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| frei von künstlichen Zusatzstoffen wie Konservierungsmitteln, Geschmacksverstärkern und Farbstoffen (on pack) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Premium Welpenmenue mit Huhn
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.