Leyen Hundefutter Lachs 370 g

Wet Pate complete High meat Clear label Full label

73out of 100

Good

our rating

Is Leyen Hundefutter Lachs 370 g a good dog food?

We score it 73/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

How we score

Why this score?

The food scores 73 out of 100. The overall quality of the ingredient list added +6.5 points, while the meat content contributed +5.3 points. The carbohydrate content reduced the score by -1.8, and the processing format brought it down by -0.7.

Recipe
73
Nutritional
Not recorded
Transparency
44
Safety
100
Evidence
Not recorded

The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.

Estimated composition

meat57.0%

carb18.0%

unknown12.6%

veg11.8%

oil0.7%

Typical analysis (as fed)

Protein: NaN%
Fat: NaN%
Fibre: NaN%
Ash: NaN%
Moisture: NaN%

Additives & feeding info

No additives recorded yet.

Who is this food for?

We could not match this product's ingredients to our glossary, so suitability flags are unknown rather than clear.

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.

Ingredients (10)

#	As declared	Matched	Category	Tier	Declared %	Est. %
1	57% Lachs	Salmon	meat	good	57	57.0
2	18% Kartoffeln	Potatoes	carb	medium	18	18.0
3	11% Lachsbrühe	unmatched	-	-	11	11.0
4	6% Karotten	Carrots	veg	good	6	6.0
5	5% Spinat	Spinach	veg	good	5	5.0
6	Petersilie	Parsley	veg	good	-	0.8
7	Sonnenblumenöl	Sunflower oil	oil	good	-	0.7
8	Hagebutte	unmatched	-	-	-	0.6
9	Mikroalge Schizochytrium	unmatched	-	-	-	0.5
10	Eierschalenpulver	unmatched	-	-	-	0.4

Brand

Website: https://www.leyen-hundefutter.de/

Trust and provenance

Recall history: No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked: 2026-09-27
Scored with: Model v3 (methodology)
Product page: www.leyen-hundefutter.de

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Scored with model v3 on 2026-09-27. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

Component	Input	Coefficient	Contribution
Base score	-	30.909	+30.91
Average ingredient quality	0.7	9.191	+6.50
Meat share of dry matter	54.7%	0.096	+5.25
Carb share of dry matter	15.4%	-0.115	-1.77
Oil share of dry matter	2.3%	-0.092	-0.21
Vegetable share of dry matter	6.0%	-0.005	-0.03
Unrecognised share of dry matter	21.5%	-0.027	-0.57
Undeclared quantities	3.0%	-0.106	-0.32
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)	yes	0.707	+0.71
Processing multiplier	1.00	33.786	+33.79
Processing: Wet Pate	yes	-0.672	-0.67

Show all 40 components

Component	Input	Coefficient	Contribution
Base score	-	30.909	+30.91
Average ingredient quality	0.7	9.191	+6.50
Meat share of dry matter	54.7%	0.096	+5.25
Carb share of dry matter	15.4%	-0.115	-1.77
Oil share of dry matter	2.3%	-0.092	-0.21
Vegetable share of dry matter	6.0%	-0.005	-0.03
Additive share of dry matter	0.0%	0.163	+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter	0.0%	-0.012	+0.00
Other share of dry matter	0.0%	-0.375	+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter	21.5%	-0.027	-0.57
Recipe graded poor	0.0%	-0.065	+0.00
Poor-quality meat in recipe	0.0%	-0.179	+0.00
Number of poor ingredients	0	-0.876	+0.00
Largest single poor ingredient	0.0%	0.060	+0.00
Undeclared quantities	3.0%	-0.106	-0.32
Prints ingredient percentages	no	0.000	+0.00
Complete diet	no	2.294	+0.00
Frozen or chilled fresh	no	0.000	+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)	yes	0.707	+0.71
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)	no	-3.158	+0.00
High carb and low meat	no	-1.180	+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages	0.0	0.000	+0.00
Meat share × fresh	0.0	0.000	+0.00
Fresh × high meat	0.0	11.084	+0.00
Additive penalty	0.00	0.222	+0.00
Processing multiplier	1.00	33.786	+33.79
Processing: Raw	no	-0.054	+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilled	no	-2.354	+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozen	no	-2.354	+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigerated	no	0.000	+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelf	no	-0.672	+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Dried	no	6.629	+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Dried	no	6.331	+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressed	no	-6.713	+0.00
Processing: Dry Baked	no	-6.713	+0.00
Processing: Dry Extruded	no	-6.713	+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moist	no	-6.174	+0.00
Processing: Dry Muesli	no	-10.146	+0.00
Processing: Wet Pate	yes	-0.672	-0.67
Processing: Wet Chunks	no	-0.672	+0.00

Processing-type offset: -0.08
Subtotal: 73.5
Final score: 73/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

Analytical constituents not declared

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

Item	Points
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)	10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (97% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)	19.4/20
✗ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file	0/15
✗ Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file	0/10
✗ Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file	0/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)	5/5
✗ Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file	0/10
✗ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) - not on file	0/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)	10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file	0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Feeding guidance given, Manufacturer identity and address, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

No on-pack claims on file: nothing to verify.

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.