Hundefutter von GRAU Ente mit Kartoffel
Dry Extruded · completeClear label
Our verdict
Is Hundefutter von GRAU Ente mit Kartoffel a good dog food?
We score it 52/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list beef, lamb, venison, pork as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists poultry fat
- Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists poultry fat
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists fish oil
- Your dog avoids duck: the label lists dried duck protein
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (13)25% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- carb 47.1%
- unknown 28.0%
- veg 7.7%
- oil 7.2%
- supplement 4.0%
- fibre 3.1%
- other 2.9%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 44% Potatoes | Potatoes | carb · medium | 44 | 44.0 |
| 2 | 28% Duck Protein | Dried Duck Protein | meat · good | 28 | 28.0 |
| 3 | Poultry Fat | Poultry Fat | oil · medium | - | 3.2 |
| 4 | Dried Beet Pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre · medium | - | 3.1 |
| 5 | 3.1% Potato Protein | Potato protein | carb · medium | 3.1 | 3.1 |
| 6 | Protein Hydrolysate | Protein Hydrolysate | other · poor | - | 2.9 |
| 7 | Linseed | Linseed | veg · good | - | 2.7 |
| 8 | Apples | Apples | veg · good | - | 2.6 |
| 9 | Chicory | Chicory | veg · good | - | 2.4 |
| 10 | Fish Oil | Fish Oil | oil · good | - | 2.2 |
| 11 | Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 2.1 |
| 12 | Yeast | Yeast | supplement · good | - | 1.9 |
| 13 | Safflower Oil | Safflower Oil | oil · good | - | 1.8 |
- 1. 44% Potatoes44% declared44.0% estimated
- 2. 28% Duck Protein28% declared28.0% estimated
- 3. Poultry Fat3.2% estimated
- 4. Dried Beet Pulp3.1% estimated
- 5. 3.1% Potato Protein3.1% declared3.1% estimated
- 6. Protein Hydrolysate2.9% estimated
- 7. Linseed2.7% estimated
- 8. Apples2.6% estimated
- 9. Chicory2.4% estimated
- 10. Fish Oil2.2% estimated
- 11. Minerals2.1% estimated
- 12. Yeast1.9% estimated
- 13. Safflower Oil1.8% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 26% · Fat 12.50%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 26% |
| Fat | 12.50% |
| Fibre | 2.50% |
| Ash | 8.70% |
| Calcium | 1.45% |
| Phosphorus | 1.10% |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Weight / Daily ration: 1-3 kg 30-60 g; 3-5 kg 60-90 g; 5-10 kg 90-155 g; 10-15 kg 155-205 g; 15-20 kg 205-255 g; 25-30 kg 305-350 g; 35-40 kg 390-430 g; 45-55 kg 470-550 g; 60-80 kg 585-725 g. Based on ideal weight; actual needs depend on age, breed and activity. Always provide fresh drinking water.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 17500 I.E.; Vitamin D3 1400 I.E.; Vitamin E 180 mg; Zink (Zinkoxid) 110 mg; Jod (Kalziumjodat, wasserfrei) 2,5 mg; Selen (Natriumselenit) 0,25 mg; Kupfer (Kupfer(II)-sulfat, Pentahydrat) 12 mg; Zink (als Aminosäuren-Zinkchelat, Hydrat) 55 mg
Technological additives
Antioxidationsmittel: Tocopherol-Extrakte aus pflanzlichen Ölen
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19
Brand and contact: Hundefutter von GRAU
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.grau-generationpet.de
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 4.7/5 · 437 reviews
88 reviews on this product · 4.9/5
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall score of 52 out of 100. The processing format contributed -6.7 points to the score, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added +3.6. On the other hand, the carbohydrate content contributed -3.1, and ingredients without printed percentages added -2.6.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.4 | 9.191 | +3.62 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 26.7% | -0.115 | -3.08 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 16.3% | -0.092 | -1.50 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 7.3% | -0.005 | -0.04 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 8.4% | -0.012 | -0.10 |
| Other share of dry matter | 3.3% | -0.375 | -1.23 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 31.8% | -0.027 | -0.84 |
| Recipe graded poor | 2.9% | -0.065 | -0.19 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 2.9% | 0.060 | +0.17 |
| Undeclared quantities | 24.9% | -0.106 | -2.63 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.4 | 9.191 | +3.62 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 26.7% | -0.115 | -3.08 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 16.3% | -0.092 | -1.50 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 7.3% | -0.005 | -0.04 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 8.4% | -0.012 | -0.10 |
| Other share of dry matter | 3.3% | -0.375 | -1.23 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 31.8% | -0.027 | -0.84 |
| Recipe graded poor | 2.9% | -0.065 | -0.19 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 2.9% | 0.060 | +0.17 |
| Undeclared quantities | 24.9% | -0.106 | -2.63 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 51.8
- Final score
- 52/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 26 | 28.7 (band 18 to 40%) | 99.3 |
| Fat | 12.5 | 13.8 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 2.5 | 2.8 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Calcium | 1.45 | 1.6 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 100 |
| Phosphorus | 1.1 | 1.2 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.3 | 1.3 (band 1 to 2%) | 89.1 |
Scored over 6 declared nutrients (combined weight 80); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 8 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A 17500 I.E.
- Vitamin D3 1400 I.E.
- Vitamin E 180 mg
- Zink (Zinkoxid) 110 mg
- Jod (Kalziumjodat, wasserfrei) 2,5 mg
- Selen (Natriumselenit) 0,25 mg
- Kupfer (Kupfer(II)-sulfat, Pentahydrat) 12 mg
- Zink (als Aminosäuren-Zinkchelat, Hydrat) 55 mg
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (75.1% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 15/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
50/100 · limited — 2 checkable claims: 1 consistent, 1 contradicted.
Contradicted by the label
- "Ente als einzige tierische Proteinquelle" — the declared label says otherwise on single protein.
Consistent with the label
- "getreidefrei" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
5 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| perfekt für sensible Hunde (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Ente ... gilt als hypoallergen (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Chicorée als natürliche Quelle von Inulin unterstützt zusätzlich die Darmflora (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| getreidefrei (on pack) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Alleinfuttermittel für erwachsene Hunde (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Ente als einzige tierische Proteinquelle (on pack) | Content | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
| hoher Gehalt an Eiweiß, Magnesium und Vitamin B1 (on page) | High/low level | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Ente mit Kartoffel
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.