Tales & Tails Rama Lamma Ding Dong Nassfutter Lamm
Wet Pate complete High meat Clear label Full label
Is Tales & Tails Rama Lamma Ding Dong Nassfutter Lamm a good dog food?
We score it 73/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Why this score?
The product scored 73 out of 100. The meat content contributed +4.2 points and the overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +2.4. Being labelled nutritionally complete contributed +2.3, while ingredients we could not classify had a negative effect of -1.4 points.
- Recipe73
- Nutritionalmedium100
- Transparency60
- Safety100
- Evidencestrong100
The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.
Why you might choose it
- Meat makes up an estimated 44% of the dry matter (58% as fed).
- Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
- Prints a percentage for nearly every ingredient, so the recipe is fully auditable.
Why you might not
- Around 51% of the recipe is generic or unspecified ingredients.
- High in fat: 22% fat on a dry-matter basis.
Estimated composition
Typical analysis (as fed)
- Protein
- 9.30%
- Fat
- 4.80%
- Fibre
- 0.60%
- Ash
- 1.80%
- Moisture
- 78.10%
Energy: 97.83 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 3000 I.E.; Vitamin D3 260 I.E.; Vitamin E 30 mg; Eisen (als Eisen(II)-Glycinchelat-Hydrat) 20 mg; Jod (als Kalziumjodat, wasserfrei) 0,375 mg; Mangan (als Mangan-(II)-Sulfat, Monohydrat) 1,4 mg; Zink (als Zink-Sulfat, Monohydrat) 25,00 mg
Storage
Ab Produktion 2 Jahre haltbar. Nach Anbruch im Kühlschrank aufbewahren und innerhalb weniger Tage aufbrauchen. Vor dem Füttern auf Zimmertemperatur bringen.
Feeding guide
Gewicht des Hundes: -2 kg: 165–190 g; 5–10 kg: 325–630 g; 10–15 kg: 630–855 g; 15–20 kg: 855–1065 g; 20–25 kg: 1065–1255 g; 25–30 kg: 1255–1440 g; 30–35 kg: 1440–1620 g; 35–40 kg: 1620–1790 g; 40–45 kg: 1790–1955 g. Stets frisches Wasser bereitstellen.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Single named protein: lamb
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- You are limiting fat: 21.9% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (7)
| # | As declared | Matched | Category | Tier | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lamb (meat, hearts, lung, liver) 58% | Lamb | meat | medium | 58 | 58.0 |
| 2 | Lamb broth 25.5% | Cooking broth | other | medium | 25.5 | 25.5 |
| 3 | Pumpkin 10% | Pumpkin | veg | good | 10 | 10.0 |
| 4 | Beetroot 3% | Beetroot | veg | good | 3 | 3.0 |
| 5 | Chicory 2% | Chicory | veg | good | 2 | 2.0 |
| 6 | Minerals 1% | Vitamins and minerals | supplement | medium | 1 | 1.0 |
| 7 | Psyllium 0.5% | Psyllium | fibre | good | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Brand
- Website
- https://talesandtails.de/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- talesandtails.de
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Scored with model v3 on 2026-09-26. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.3 | 9.191 | +2.37 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 44.1% | 0.096 | +4.24 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 1.2% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 2.5% | -0.012 | -0.03 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 50.9% | -0.027 | -1.35 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.3 | 9.191 | +2.37 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 44.1% | 0.096 | +4.24 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 1.2% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 2.5% | -0.012 | -0.03 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 50.9% | -0.027 | -1.35 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 0.0% | -0.106 | +0.00 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 73.2
- Final score
- 73/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 9.3 | 42.5 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 4.8 | 21.9 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 0.6 | 2.7 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 99.9 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 97.83 | 446.7 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (100% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 20/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · strong — 3 checkable claims: 3 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "Ohne Zusatz von Getreide oder Zucker" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
- "Monoprotein - Lamm als einzige tierische Proteinquelle" — supported by the declared single protein data.
- "frei von Getreide" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
11 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Strong: at least three checkable claims, all consistent with the declared label, and no compliance cap.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hohe Verträglichkeit: Leicht verdaulich, kann zu besserem Output führen (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Für empfindliche Mägen: weniger Bauchgrummeln und weniger Blähungen (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Für geplagte Hunde: Schluss mit Pfoten lecken, Gras fressen oder entzündeten Ohren (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Hohe Akzeptanz: Wird selbst von mäkeligen Hunden gern gefressen (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Kann im Wechsel mit Trockenfutter oder als Topping gefüttert werden (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100% Geld-zurück-Garantie, falls es dein Hund nicht verträgt (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Ohne Tierversuche: Für unser Futter werden keine Tierversuche durchgeführt (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Ohne Zusatz von Getreide oder Zucker (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Kurze Zutatenliste: Nur 6 Zutaten – optimal für Hunde mit Unverträglichkeiten (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Monoprotein - Lamm als einzige tierische Proteinquelle (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| frei von Getreide (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| 1 Dose = 1 Spende für Tierschutzprojekte (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| ohne Zucker, ohne Soja, ohne Farbstoffe, ohne Geschmacksverstärker, ohne Geflügelfett und ohne unnötige Füllstoffe (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Alleinfuttermittel für Hunde ab dem 12. Monat: Dein Hund ist mit diesem Futter rundum versorgt (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Other products from Tales & Tails
See all products from Tales & Tails
Alternatives to Rama Lamma Ding Dong Nassfutter Lamm
Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.
Community
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.