Our verdict
Is Tales & Tails Ente gut, alles gut a good dog food?
We score it 69/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
30% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Single named protein: duck
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- You are limiting fat: 20.7% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (7)30% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 70.0%
- veg 15.0%
- carb 9.2%
- supplement 5.8%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.33% Duck | Duck | meat · medium | 3.33 | 3.3 |
| 2 | 22.33% Protein Hydrolysate | Protein Hydrolysate | other · poor | 22.33 | 22.3 |
| 3 | from Duck 1% | Duck | meat · medium | 1 | 1.0 |
| 4 | Sweet Potato | Sweet Potatoes | carb · good | - | 22.6 |
| 5 | Pumpkin | Pumpkin | veg · good | - | 19.7 |
| 6 | Apple | Apples | veg · good | - | 16.9 |
| 7 | Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 14.1 |
- 1. 3.33% Duck3.33% declared3.3% estimated
- 2. 22.33% Protein Hydrolysate22.33% declared22.3% estimated
- 3. from Duck 1%1% declared1.0% estimated
- 4. Sweet Potato22.6% estimated
- 5. Pumpkin19.7% estimated
- 6. Apple16.9% estimated
- 7. Minerals14.1% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 27% · Fat 17%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed | Dry matter | Directory average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 27% | 32.93% | 35.95% (31 eligible foods) |
| Fat | 17% | 20.73% | 20.12% (30 eligible foods) |
| Fibre | 3% | 3.66% | 3.36% (30 eligible foods) |
| Ash | 9.20% | 11.22% | 8.22% (30 eligible foods) |
| Moisture | 18% | - | - |
| Carbohydrates | - | 31.10% | 25.55% (21 eligible foods) |
Energy: 343 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Richtwerte tägliche Gesamtration je nach Gewicht: 2,5–5 kg: 55–95 g; 12,5–15 kg: 190–220 g; 22,5–25 kg: 300–325 g; 30–35 kg: 370–415 g; 50–60 kg: 545–625 g; 90–100 kg: 845–915 g. Bei gesteigerter Aktivität Futtermenge entsprechend erhöhen. Stets frisches Wasser bereitstellen.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 12000 IE; Vitamin D3 1200 IE; Vitamin E 70 mg; Zink (als Zinkoxid) 70 mg; Jod (als Kalziumjodat, wasserfrei) 2 mg; Selen (als Natriumselenit) 0,2 mg; Kupfer (als Kupfer(II)-sulfat-Pentahydrat) 10 mg; Vitamin B1: 3 mg; Vitamin B2: 8 mg; Vitamin B6: 2 mg; Vitamin B12: 45 µg; Biotin: 200 µg; Calcium-D-Panthothenat: 18 mg; Niacin: 20 mg; Folsäure: 0,3 mg; Cholinchlorid: 1650 µg
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-10-05
Brand and contact: Tales & Tails
- Website
- https://talesandtails.de/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-10-05
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- talesandtails.de
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 4.3/5 · 814 reviews
2,175 reviews on this product · 4.9/5
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall score of 69 out of 100 based on several key factors. The processing format contributed -6.7 to the total, while the meat content added +6.4. Furthermore, the overall quality of the ingredient list provided +5.3, though ingredients without printed percentages deducted -3.2 from the final score.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.31 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 66.5% | 0.096 | +6.39 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 7.8% | -0.115 | -0.90 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 7.6% | -0.005 | -0.04 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 18.0% | -0.012 | -0.22 |
| Undeclared quantities | 30.0% | -0.106 | -3.17 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.31 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 66.5% | 0.096 | +6.39 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 7.8% | -0.115 | -0.90 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 7.6% | -0.005 | -0.04 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 18.0% | -0.012 | -0.22 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 30.0% | -0.106 | -3.17 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 68.7
- Final score
- 69/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 27 | 32.9 (band 18.823170731707314 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 17 | 20.7 (band 5.751524390243902 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 3 | 3.7 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 343 | 418.3 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 16 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A 12000 IE
- Vitamin D3 1200 IE
- Vitamin E 70 mg
- Zink (als Zinkoxid) 70 mg
- Jod (als Kalziumjodat, wasserfrei) 2 mg
- Selen (als Natriumselenit) 0,2 mg
- Kupfer (als Kupfer(II)-sulfat-Pentahydrat) 10 mg
- Vitamin B1: 3 mg
- Vitamin B2: 8 mg
- Vitamin B6: 2 mg
- Vitamin B12: 45 µg
- Biotin: 200 µg
- Calcium-D-Panthothenat: 18 mg
- Niacin: 20 mg
- Folsäure: 0,3 mg
- Cholinchlorid: 1650 µg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (70% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 14/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · strong — 4 checkable claims: 4 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "Kurze Rezeptur ohne Getreide und Zuckerzusatz" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
- "Ente als einzige tierische Proteinquelle" — supported by the declared single protein data.
- "Alleinfuttermittel für Hunde ab dem 12. Monat, dein Hund ist mit diesem Futter rundum versorgt" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
- "Ohne Zusatz von Getreide oder Zucker: Keine unnötigen Füllstoffe, für sensible Esser geeignet" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
9 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Strong: at least three checkable claims, all consistent with the declared label, and no compliance cap.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Soft & saftig – auch für wählerische Hunde spannend (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Perfekt für Allergiker geeignet: Monoprotein - Ente als einzige tierische Proteinquelle (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Hohe Verträglichkeit: Leicht verdaulich, geringerer Output und weniger Magenprobleme (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Nie mehr ein stehengelassener Napf: Geschmacksintensives Entenfleisch und softe Konsistenz sorgen für hohe Akzeptanz selbst bei mäkeligen Hunden (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Glänzendes Fell & gesunde Haut: Entenfleisch enthält Omega-3-Fettsäuren, die sich positiv auf die Hautgesundheit und das Fell auswirken (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Nur 5 Zutaten: Extrem kurze und transparente Zutatenliste. Du weißt genau was drin ist. (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Kurze Rezeptur ohne Getreide und Zuckerzusatz (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Ente als einzige tierische Proteinquelle (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Hergestellt in Deutschland: Mit Ente aus artgerechter Haltung (on page) | provenance | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Alleinfuttermittel für Hunde ab dem 12. Monat, dein Hund ist mit diesem Futter rundum versorgt (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Ohne Tierversuche: Für unser Futter werden keine Tierversuche durchgeführt (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 1 Tüte = 1 Spende für Tierschutzprojekte (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Ohne Zusatz von Getreide oder Zucker: Keine unnötigen Füllstoffe, für sensible Esser geeignet (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Ente gut, alles gut
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.