Tales & Tails Auf der PHirsch – Nassfutter Hirsch für Hunde
Wet Pate · completeHigh meatClear label
Our verdict
Is Tales & Tails Auf der PHirsch – Nassfutter Hirsch für Hunde a good dog food?
We score it 76/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Single named protein: venison
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- You are limiting fat: 22.8% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (7)7 of 7 percentages printed
Estimated composition
- meat 50.0%
- unknown 25.0%
- veg 23.5%
- supplement 1.0%
- oil 0.5%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Muscle Meat 50% | Muscle Meat | meat · good | 50 | 50.0 |
| 2 | Venison Stock 25% | Venison Broth | meat · good | 25 | 25.0 |
| 3 | Parsnip 17% | Parsnips | veg · good | 17 | 17.0 |
| 4 | Blueberry 5% | Blueberries | veg · good | 5 | 5.0 |
| 5 | Dandelion 1.5% | Dandelion Root | veg · good | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| 6 | Minerals 1% | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | 1 | 1.0 |
| 7 | Hemp Oil 0.5% | Hemp Oil | oil · good | 0.5 | 0.5 |
- 1. Muscle Meat 50%50% declared50.0% estimated
- 2. Venison Stock 25%25% declared25.0% estimated
- 3. Parsnip 17%17% declared17.0% estimated
- 4. Blueberry 5%5% declared5.0% estimated
- 5. Dandelion 1.5%1.5% declared1.5% estimated
- 6. Minerals 1%1% declared1.0% estimated
- 7. Hemp Oil 0.5%0.5% declared0.5% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 11.42% · Fat 5.20%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 11.42% |
| Fat | 5.20% |
| Fibre | 1.10% |
| Ash | 2.70% |
| Moisture | 77.20% |
Energy: 93 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Ab Produktion zwei Jahre haltbar. Nach Anbruch im Kühlschrank zwischen 4°C und 7°C lagern und innerhalb von maximal 3-5 Tagen aufbrauchen.
Feeding guide
1-5 kg: 80-400 g; 5-10 kg: 400-650 g; 10-15 kg: 650-1000 g; 15-20 kg: 1000-1200 g; 20-25 kg: 1200-1400 g; 25-30 kg: 1400-1600 g; 30-35 kg: 1600-1900 g; 35-40 kg: 1900-2000 g; 40-45 kg: 2000-2300 g
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A als Retinylacetat 2200 IE; Vitamin D3 180 IE; Vitamin E/all rac-alpha-Tocopherylacetat 12 mg; Kupfer als Cu-(II)-Sulfat Pentahydrat 1.60 mg; Mangan als Mangan-(II)-oxid 0.90 mg; Zink aus Zn-Sulfat Monohydrat 15.00 mg; Selen aus Na-Selenit 0.07 mg
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-10-05
Brand and contact: Tales & Tails
- Website
- https://talesandtails.de/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-10-05
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- talesandtails.de
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 4.3/5 · 814 reviews
222 reviews on this product · 4.9/5
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The food reached a score of 76 out of 100. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +4.6 points. The meat content added +4.3 points and being labelled nutritionally complete contributed +2.3 points. Ingredients we could not classify reduced the score by -1.1 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.58 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 44.5% | 0.096 | +4.27 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 1.6% | -0.092 | -0.14 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 11.2% | -0.005 | -0.06 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 2.9% | -0.012 | -0.04 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 39.8% | -0.027 | -1.05 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.58 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 44.5% | 0.096 | +4.27 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 1.6% | -0.092 | -0.14 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 11.2% | -0.005 | -0.06 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 2.9% | -0.012 | -0.04 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 39.8% | -0.027 | -1.05 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 0.0% | -0.106 | +0.00 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 75.5
- Final score
- 76/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 11.42 | 50.1 (band 18.35526315789474 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 5.2 | 22.8 (band 5.608552631578948 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 1.1 | 4.8 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 93 | 407.9 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 7 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A als Retinylacetat 2200 IE
- Vitamin D3 180 IE
- Vitamin E/all rac-alpha-Tocopherylacetat 12 mg
- Kupfer als Cu-(II)-Sulfat Pentahydrat 1.60 mg
- Mangan als Mangan-(II)-oxid 0.90 mg
- Zink aus Zn-Sulfat Monohydrat 15.00 mg
- Selen aus Na-Selenit 0.07 mg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (100% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 20/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) | 5/5 |
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 2 checkable claims: 2 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "Perfekt für Allergiker geeignet: Hirsch als einzige tierische Proteinquelle" — supported by the declared single protein data.
- "Ohne Zusatz von Getreide oder Zucker: Keine unnötigen Füllstoffe" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
7 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hohe Verträglichkeit: Leicht verdaulich (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100% 'Napf-leer'-Garantie: Hohe Akzeptanz - wird selbst von mäkeligen Hunden extrem gern gefressen (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Für sensible Mägen: Besonders gut bekömmlich, für Hunde mit Allergien und Unverträglichkeiten (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Weniger Magenprobleme: weniger Durchfall und Blähungen (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 1 Dose = 1 Spende für Tierschutzprojekte (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Ohne Tierversuche: Für unser Futter werden keine Tierversuche durchgeführt (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Perfekt für Allergiker geeignet: Hirsch als einzige tierische Proteinquelle (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Ohne Zusatz von Getreide oder Zucker: Keine unnötigen Füllstoffe (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Alleinfuttermittel für Hunde ab dem 12. Monat (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Auf der PHirsch – Nassfutter Hirsch für Hunde
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.