HelloBello Cowgenuss frisch gekochtes Hundefutter mit Rind
Fresh Frozen · completeClear label
Our verdict
Is HelloBello Cowgenuss frisch gekochtes Hundefutter mit Rind a good dog food?
We score it 37/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Single named protein: fish
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - white
- You are limiting fat: 27.4% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (9)23% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- other 46.8%
- veg 26.0%
- unknown 11.7%
- carb 10.4%
- supplement 3.0%
- oil 2.2%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Muskelfleisch vom Rind 36% | Rind | other · poor | 36 | 36.0 |
| 2 | frische Rinderlunge 4.5% | unmatched | - | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| 3 | frische Rinderniere 4.5% | unmatched | - | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| 4 | Karotten (15%) | Carrots | veg · good | 15 | 15.0 |
| 5 | Reis (8%) | Rice - white | carb · medium | 8 | 8.0 |
| 6 | Erbsen (5%) | Peas | veg · good | 5 | 5.0 |
| 7 | Lachsöl (1%) | Salmon Oil | oil · good | 1 | 1.0 |
| 8 | Mariendistelöl (0.7%) | Thistle oil | oil · good | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| 9 | Minerals toffmix (2.3%) | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | 2.3 | 2.3 |
- 1. Muskelfleisch vom Rind 36%36% declared36.0% estimated
- 2. frische Rinderlunge 4.5%4.5% declared4.5% estimated
- 3. frische Rinderniere 4.5%4.5% declared4.5% estimated
- 4. Karotten (15%)15% declared15.0% estimated
- 5. Reis (8%)8% declared8.0% estimated
- 6. Erbsen (5%)5% declared5.0% estimated
- 7. Lachsöl (1%)1% declared1.0% estimated
- 8. Mariendistelöl (0.7%)0.7% declared0.7% estimated
- 9. Minerals toffmix (2.3%)2.3% declared2.3% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 8.70% · Fat 8%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 8.70% |
| Fat | 8% |
| Fibre | 0.50% |
| Ash | 2% |
| Moisture | 70.80% |
| Calcium | 0.41% |
| Phosphorus | 0.29% |
| Sodium | 0.21% |
Energy: 140 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Kühl oder gefroren lagern. Einfach auftauen und genießen. Lieferung tiefgefroren.
Feeding guide
Tag 1-2: 25% ersetzen, Tag 3-4: 30% ersetzen, Tag 5-6: 75% ersetzen, Tag 7: Umstellung abgeschlossen. Individuelle Portionsgrößen auf den Hund abgestimmt. Gesamtkosten pro Tag ab 2,90€.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Kupfer (3b413) 4 mg/kg; Zink (3b606) 16,5 mg/kg; Mangan (3b504) 5,5 mg/kg; Vitamin A (3a672c) 13160 I.E./kg; Vitamin D3 (3a671) 393 I.E./kg; Vitamin E (3a700) 393 mg/kg
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19
Brand and contact: HelloBello
- Website
- https://www.hellobello.de/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.hellobello.de
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 4.5/5 · 242 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This food scores 37 out of 100. The score is reduced by the remaining ingredients at -18.6, by ingredients without printed percentages at -2.4, by the processing format at -2.4, and by the overall quality of the ingredient list at -2.3.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | -0.2 | 9.191 | -2.26 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 19.4% | -0.115 | -2.23 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 4.6% | -0.092 | -0.43 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 8.3% | -0.005 | -0.04 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 5.8% | -0.012 | -0.07 |
| Other share of dry matter | 49.5% | -0.375 | -18.56 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 12.4% | -0.027 | -0.33 |
| Recipe graded poor | 36.0% | -0.065 | -2.34 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 36.0% | 0.060 | +2.16 |
| Undeclared quantities | 23.0% | -0.106 | -2.43 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | -0.2 | 9.191 | -2.26 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 19.4% | -0.115 | -2.23 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 4.6% | -0.092 | -0.43 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 8.3% | -0.005 | -0.04 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 5.8% | -0.012 | -0.07 |
| Other share of dry matter | 49.5% | -0.375 | -18.56 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 12.4% | -0.027 | -0.33 |
| Recipe graded poor | 36.0% | -0.065 | -2.34 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 36.0% | 0.060 | +2.16 |
| Undeclared quantities | 23.0% | -0.106 | -2.43 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -1.74
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 36.7
- Final score
- 37/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 8.7 | 29.8 (band 21.57534246575342 to 40%) | 96.8 |
| Fat | 8 | 27.4 (band 6.592465753424656 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 0.5 | 1.7 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 86.2 |
| Calcium | 0.41 | 1.4 (band 0.5993150684931505 to 2.5%) | 95.4 |
| Phosphorus | 0.29 | 1 (band 0.47945205479452047 to 1.6%) | 97.5 |
| Sodium | 0.21 | 0.7 (band 0.11986301369863012+%) | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.4 | 1.4 (band 1 to 2%) | 94.8 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 140 | 479.5 | 100 |
Scored over 8 declared nutrients (combined weight 95); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 6 nutritional additives on the label
- Kupfer (3b413) 4 mg/kg
- Zink (3b606) 16,5 mg/kg
- Mangan (3b504) 5,5 mg/kg
- Vitamin A (3a672c) 13160 I.E./kg
- Vitamin D3 (3a671) 393 I.E./kg
- Vitamin E (3a700) 393 mg/kg
High confidence: full analysis plus minerals or omegas and declared energy.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (77% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 15.4/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
0/100 · limited — 2 checkable claims: 0 consistent, 2 contradicted.
Contradicted by the label
- "Getreidefrei" — the declared label says otherwise on grain-free.
- "Glutenfrei" — the declared label says otherwise on grain-free.
10 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 86% gesünderes und glänzenderes Fell (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 92% spürbare Verdauungsverbesserung (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Verdaulichkeit von über 90% (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Kostenloser Versand (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Täglich frisch zubereitet (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Geld-zurück-Garantie (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Getreidefrei (on page) | Free-from | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
| Umweltfreundliche Verpackung (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100% Zutaten in Lebensmittelqualität (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Schonend gekocht, direkt eingefroren (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Glutenfrei (on page) | Free-from | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100 % Fleisch & Gemüse aus DE & AT (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Cowgenuss frisch gekochtes Hundefutter mit Rind
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.